Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Hizmetlere İlişkin Turist ve Çalışkan Değerlendirmelerinin Karşılaştırılması

Comparison of Tourists' and Employees' Evaluations Regarding Services

Pages
81–91
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, Belgians' evaluations were set apart from those of the mentioned nationalities in "attitude of employees".

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A survey was conducted in Muğla Region to find out, on one hand, whether there are differences between tourists' evaluations of hospitalities' performances and employees self-evaluations, and on the other hand whether evaluations of tourists from various countries differ.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Tourists' and service providers' evaluations in six constructed areas differed significantly only in two areas: "attitudes" and "behaviors and skillfulness".
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, Belgians' evaluations were set apart from those of the mentioned nationalities in "attitude of employees".
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A survey was conducted in Muğla Region to find out, on one hand, whether there are differences between tourists' evaluations of hospitalities' performances and employees self-evaluations, and on the other hand whether evaluations of tourists from various countries differ. Tourists' and service providers' evaluations in six constructed areas differed significantly only in two areas: "attitudes" and "behaviors and skillfulness". Tourists' evaluations in the mentioned areas are significantly higher than those of employees. When it comes to the second issue, the study shows that there are some significant differences between Russian tourists' evaluations and Western nationalities' evaluations, those of British, Germans, Dutch, and Scottish. Also, Belgians' evaluations were set apart from those of the mentioned nationalities in "attitude of employees".

Özet

Turistlerin uyruklarına bağlı olarak konaklama işletmelerinin hizmet performansı hakkındaki değerlendirmelerinin farklılık arz edip etmediğini saptamak ve turistler ile hizmet verenlerin değerlendirmelerini karşılaştırmak amacıyla Muğla İli'nde bir tarama (survey) çalışması yapılmıştır. Altı alanda yapılan hizmet performans değerlendirmeleri karşılaştırmalarından sadece ikisinde ("tutumlar " ve "davranışlar ve beceriler") turist ve personelin karşılaştırmalarında anlamlı düzeyde farklılık çıkmıştır. Bu iki alanda turistlerin değerlendirmeleri daha yüksektir. İkinci konuya gelince, Batılı ülkelerden olan İngiliz, Alman, Hollandalı ve İskoçların değerlendirmeleri ile Rusların değerlendirmeleri arasında önemli farklılıklar bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, Belçikalı turistlerin değerlendirmelerinin "çalışanların tutumları" konusunda Alman, İngiliz, Hollanda ve İskoçların değerlendirmelerinden anlamlı düzeyde farklılık bulgulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYILIR, A., AVCI, U. (2007). Hizmetlere İlişkin Turist ve Çalışkan Değerlendirmelerinin Karşılaştırılması. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 81–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/128890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. ARGYLE, M., HENDERSON, M., BOND, M., LIZUKA, Y., CONTARELLO, A. (1986). Cross-cultural variations in relationships rules. International Journal of Psychology, 21(33), pp.287-315.
  2. ARGYRIS, C. (1995).
  3. On organizational learning, Blackwell Publisher,
  4. Inc. BOLTON, R.N., MATTHEW, B.M. (2003). Price-based global market segmentation for services. Journal of Marketing, 67 (3), pp. 108-128.
  5. BOWEN, D., CLARKE, J. (2002). Reflections on tourist satisfaction research: past,present and future. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 8 (4), pp. 297-308.
  6. BROWN, S.W., TERESA, A.S. (1989). A gap analysis of professional service quality. Journal of Marketing, 53 (2), pp. 92-98.
  7. CARMAN, J. M. (1990). Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing, 66 (1), pp. 33-55.
  8. Comparative price level, MEL (2006), p.269. Available from: _____www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/61/54/18598754.pdf>, [Accessed November 2006].
  9. CRONIN, J.J., TAYLOR, S.A. (1992). Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56 (3), pp. 55-68.
  10. ENGEL, J.F., BLACKWELL, R.D., MINIARD, P.W. (1993). Consumer behavior, (7th Edition), the Dryden Press.
  11. GARVIN, D.A. (1983). Quality on the line. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), pp. 65-73.
  12. GILBERT, D., WONG, R. K. C. (2003). Passenger expectations and airline services: a Hong Kong based study. Tourism Management, 24 (5), pp. 519-532.
  13. HALL, E. T. (1976)
  14. Beyond culture, Garden City, NY: Doubleday. HALSTEAD, D., DAVID H., SANDRA L. S. (1994). Multisource effects on the satisfaction formation process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22 (2), pp. 114-129
  15. HOFSTEDE, G. (1991). Culture and organizations: software of the mind, McGraw-Hill. JAVIDAN, M., HOUSE, R.J. (2001). Cultural acumen for the global manager lessons from Project Globe. Organizational Dynamics, 29 (4), pp. 289-305
  16. KIM, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 35(1), Fall, pp. 37-49.
  17. KNUTSON B., STEVENS P., PATTON M. (1995). Dineserv: measuring service quality in quick service, casual/theme and fine dining restaurants. Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing, 3(2), pp. 35-42.
  18. KNUTSON B., STEVENS P., WULLAERT C, PATTON M., Y0K0YAMA F. (1991). Lodgserv: a service quality index for the lodging industry. Hospitality Research Journal, H (2), pp.277-284.
  19. LAROCHE, M. U., LINDA C, ABE, S., CLEVELAND, M., YANNÖPOULOS, P. P. (2004). Service quality perceptions and customer satisfacti