SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin öncülleri üzerine bir araştırma

Investigating the antecedents of organization identification

K.İpek TÜZÜN
İRFAN ÇAĞLAR
Pages
284–293
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings show that the relationship between attractiveness of perceived organizational identity (APOI) and identification is mediated by trust, and identity attractiveness does not directly influence the identification strength.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT: The goal of this paper is to precisely examine the relationship between the attractiveness of organizational identity and strength of identification, and how perceived trust underlines such a possible effect of identity attractiveness on organizational identification (OID).
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 545 public and private bank employees attended the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings show that the relationship between attractiveness of perceived organizational identity (APOI) and identification is mediated by trust, and identity attractiveness does not directly influence the identification strength.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · Turkey

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The goal of this paper is to precisely examine the relationship between the attractiveness of organizational identity and strength of identification, and how perceived trust underlines such a possible effect of identity attractiveness on organizational identification (OID). A total of 545 public and private bank employees attended the study. Participants completed measures of organizational identification, organizational trust, and attractiveness of perceived organizational identity. Structural equation modeling and LISREL8.30 (Jöreskog and Sörbom, 1993) was used to assess the research model. The findings show that the relationship between attractiveness of perceived organizational identity (APOI) and identification is mediated by trust, and identity attractiveness does not directly influence the identification strength.

Özet

ÖZET: Bu çalışmanın amacı çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel güven, örgütsel kimlik ve örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişkiyi tespit etmek ve örgütsel kimlik algılamasının, örgütsel güven aracılığıyla örgütsel özdeşleşmeye yol açtığını öneren bir model önerisi sunmaktır. 545 kamu ve özel sermayeli ticari banka çalışanları üzerinde görgül bir çalışma yapılmıştır. Araştırma modeli testi için yapısal eşitlik modeli ve LISREL8.30 (Jöreskog ve Sörbom, 1993) istatistik programı kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmaya göre algılanan örgütsel kimliğin özdeşleşme üzerinde doğrudan etkisi söz konusu değildir. Algılanan güvenin, algılanan örgütsel kimliğin çekiciliği ve özdeşleşme arasında aracı etki yaptığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜZÜN, K., ÇAĞLAR, İ. (2009). Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin öncülleri üzerine bir araştırma. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 284–293. https://ajindex.com/articles/128671

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. References ALBERT, S., & WHETTEN, D. (1985). Organizational identity. L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol 7, pp.263-295.
  2. ALDER, S.G., NOEL T.W. & AMBROSE M.L. (2006). Clarifying the effects of Internet monitoring on job attitudes: The mediating role of employee trust, Information and Management, vol 43, pp. 894-903.
  3. ASHFORTH, B.E., & MAEL, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organizations, Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, pp. 20-39.
  4. AYCAN, Z. (2001). Human resource management in Turkey - Current issues and future challenges, International Journal of Manpower, vol. 22:3, pp. 252-259.
  5. BALL, D.A., MCCULLOCH, W.H., FRANTZ, P.L., GERINGER, J.M., & MINOR, M.S. (2002). International Business: The Challenge of Global Competition, New York, NY, McGraw-Hill Irwin. BHATTACHARYA, C.B. & SEN, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumer’s relationship with companies, Journal of Marketing, 67:2, pp.76-88.
  6. BIES, R.J., & TRIP T.M. (1996). Beyond trust: “getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & R.T. Tyler (Eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, London. BUTLER, J.K. (1991). Towards Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust; Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory, Journal of Management, vol7, no. 3, pp. 643-63.
  7. COLE, M.S. and BRUCH, H. (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationship with turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter?. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol 7, pp. 585-605.
  8. CONNAUGHTON, S.L., & DALY, J.A. (2004).
  9. Identification with leader, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, vol 9, no.2, pp. 89-103.
  10. COOK, J. & WALL, T (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment, Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol 53, pp.39-52.
  11. CREMER, D.D., & VAN KNIPPENBERG, D. (2005). Cooperation as a function of leader self sacrifice, trust and identification, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, vol 25, no.5, pp. 355-369.
  12. CUMMINGS, L.L. & BROMILEY, P. (1996). The Organizational trust inventory (OTI). In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.). Trust in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, London. DE CREMER, D. VAN DIJKE, M. BOS A.E.R. (2006). Leader’s procedural justice affecting identification and trust, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, vo