Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 34 Issue: 2

Bilateral variations of the great saphenous vein

Ali Zeybek(TEKIRDAG NAMIK KEMAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9773-2739
Mazhar Ozkan(TEKIRDAG NAMIK KEMAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8745-2493
Meltem Alpay(TEKIRDAG NAMIK KEMAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7231-8796
Pages
—
Publication Date
2021-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We think that recognizing this and such variations before surgery will increase success.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The great saphenous vein is the longest in the human body and has been one of the most preferred autologous tissue in bypass surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After a detailed inspection of the veins at both sides, we measured and illustrated the variant branches.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We think that recognizing this and such variations before surgery will increase success.
🔬Design:Case Report
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Great saphenous vein · Bilateral variation · Cadaver

Abstract

The great saphenous vein is the longest in the human body and has been one of the most preferred autologous tissue in bypass surgery. It is affected by the life conditions causing pathological dilatations called varices. We observed bilaterally duplicated great saphenous vein in both lower limbs of an elderly male human cadaver during our routine dissection for undergraduate anatomy education. After a detailed inspection of the veins at both sides, we measured and illustrated the variant branches. In this case report, we presented bilaterally duplicated great saphenous veins, accompanied by an accessory saphenous vein. To the best of our knowledge, there are no such variations reported in the literature so far. We think that recognizing this and such variations before surgery will increase success.

🔖

Cite This Article

Zeybek, A., Ozkan, M., Alpay, M. (2021). Bilateral variations of the great saphenous vein. Marmara Medical Journal, Volume: 34 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.945178

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. İmamoğlu H, Erdoğan N, Doğan S, Kahriman G. A rare anatomical variation of the great saphenous vein course. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017;40:1653-4, doi: 10.1007/ s00270.017.1628-y
  2. Barner HB, Farkas EA. Conduits for coronary bypass: vein grafts. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;45:275, doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2012.45.5.275.
  3. Özyurt B, Uysal M, Taş U, Çiçek M. Duplication of vena saphena magna: A variation in a male cadaver. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2013;5:164-71, https:// dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gutfd/issue/34276/378807
  4. Packiriswamy V, Nayak SB. Saphenous Ladder formed by almost completely duplicated great saphenous vein. Kathmandu University Medical Journal (KUMJ). 2020;18:99- 101.
  5. Ricci S, Caggiati A. Does a double long saphenous vein exist? Phlebology 1999;14:59-64, doi: 10.1177/026.835.559901400205
  6. Cavezzi A, Labropoulos N, Partsch H, et al. Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs—UIP Consensus Document. Part II. Anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovascu Surg 2006;31:288-99, doi: 10.1016/j. ejvs.2005.07.020
  7. Schul MW, Vayuvegula S, Keaton TJ. The clinical relevance of anterior accessory great saphenous vein reflux. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020;8:1014-20, doi: 10.1016/j. jvsv.2020.02.010
  8. Cheung-Flynn J, Song J, Voskresensky I, et al. Limiting injury during saphenous vein graft preparation for coronary arterial bypass prevents metabolic decompensation. Sci Rep 2017;7:14179. doi:10.1038/s41598.017.13819-w
  9. Zachrisson H, Lindenberger M, Hallman D, Ekman M, Neider D, Länne T. Diameter and compliance of the greater saphenous vein-effect of age and nitroglycerine. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2011;31:300-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475- 097X.2011.01016.x
  10. Motwani R, Jain P. Duplication of great saphenous vein-Anatomical description and its clinical implications. Int J Biol Med Res 2013;4:3372-4, doi: 10.1.1.398.3693&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  11. Schanzer A, Hevelone N, Owens CD, et al. Technical factors affecting autogenous vein graft failure: observations from a large multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:1180-90, doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.033.