SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marine Science and Technology Bulletin / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 2

AIS-based ship emission inventory and emission intensity indicators for the Port of Mersin (Eastern Mediterranean)

Özkan Akar(İskenderun Technical University, Maritime Vocational School of Higher Education, Department of Marine and Harbour Management, 31200, Hatay, Türkiye)0000-0002-8126-2883
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that total emissions during the study period reached 15,132 tons of NOX, 8,125 tons of SO2, 816,406 tons of CO2, 2,089 tons of CO, 741 tons of HC, and 1,194 tons of PM.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Maritime transport is an important source of air pollution in port cities due to exhaust emissions generated during ship operations, particularly during cruising, manoeuvring, and hotelling phases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulphur dioxide (SO2), carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), and particulate matter (PM) were estimated for the period 2015–2019 based on ship types and operational phases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that total emissions during the study period reached 15,132 tons of NOX, 8,125 tons of SO2, 816,406 tons of CO2, 2,089 tons of CO, 741 tons of HC, and 1,194 tons of PM.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015–2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ship emissions · AIS data · Emission inventory

Abstract

Maritime transport is an important source of air pollution in port cities due to exhaust emissions generated during ship operations, particularly during cruising, manoeuvring, and hotelling phases. In this study, a ship emission inventory for the Port of Mersin (Eastern Mediterranean, Türkiye) was developed using AIS-based ship activity data and an activity-based bottom-up emission calculation approach. Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulphur dioxide (SO2), carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), and particulate matter (PM) were estimated for the period 2015–2019 based on ship types and operational phases. The results showed that total emissions during the study period reached 15,132 tons of NOX, 8,125 tons of SO2, 816,406 tons of CO2, 2,089 tons of CO, 741 tons of HC, and 1,194 tons of PM. Container vessels were identified as the dominant emission source, accounting for 55.6% of total emissions, followed by Ro-Ro passenger and general cargo vessels. The analysis of operational phases indicated that cruising and hotelling were the major contributors to total emissions, with hotelling emissions being particularly significant due to continuous auxiliary engine operation at berth. In addition to total emissions, emission intensity indicators per ship call, per ton of cargo handled, and per TEU were evaluated to assess the environmental performance of port operations. The results indicated that emission intensity increased between 2015 and 2017 and decreased in the following years, suggesting improved emission efficiency relative to cargo throughput. The findings provide important information for emission management, environmental planning, and sustainable port development in Türkiye and the Eastern Mediterranean region.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akar, Ö. (2026). AIS-based ship emission inventory and emission intensity indicators for the Port of Mersin (Eastern Mediterranean). Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, Volume: 15 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.1919465

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. Akar, Ö., & Demirci, A. (2025). Assessing the effects of exhaust emissions on air quality in fishing vessels from the Iskenderun Bay, Türkiye. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(15), 14965-14974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-025-06596-x
  2. Akar, Ö., Çalışır, V., & Demirci, A. (2020). Determination of the amount and effects of ship fuel gas emissions in Iskenderun Bay. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 29(07A), 6039-6045.
  3. Ay, C. (2020). Investigation of emissions from commercial ships passing through the Istanbul Strait [MSc Thesis, Istanbul Technical University]
  4. Aygül, Ö., & Baştuğ, S. (2020). Maritime transport-based air pollution and its effect on human health. Journal of Maritime Transport and Logistics, 1(1), 26-40.
  5. Balcombe, P., Brierley, J., Lewis, C., Skatvedt, L., Speirs, J., Hawkes, A., & Staffell, I. (2019). How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies. Energy Conversion and Management, 182, 72-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080
  6. Bouman, E. A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A. I., & Strømman, A. H. (2017). State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping–A review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52(Part A), 408-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
  7. Brewer, T. (2020). A maritime emission control area for the Mediterranean Sea? Technological solutions and policy options for a ‘Med ECA’. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, 5(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-020-00155-1
  8. Cai, O., Peng, C., & Yu, X. (2021). The development of port emissions inventory from decision-making perspective: Case of the port of Los Angeles. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 675(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/675/1/012022
  9. Canton, H. (2021). International maritime organization—IMO. In Europa Publications (Ed.), The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2021 (23rd ed.) (pp. 338-342). Routledge.
  10. Chatzinikolaou, S. D., Oikonomou, S. D., & Ventikos, N. P. (2015). Health externalities of ship air pollution at port – Piraeus port case study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 40, 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.010
  11. Corbett, J. J., & Koehler, H. W. (2003). Updated emissions from ocean shipping. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D20), 4650. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003751
  12. Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V., & Lauer, A. (2007). Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(24), 8512-8518. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071686z
  13. Demirci, A., & Karagüzel, M. (2018). The evaluation of fishing vessels fuel consumption and pollution emissions in Iskenderun Bay. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(1), 508-514.
  14. Deniz, C., & Kılıç, A. (2010). Inventory of shipping emissions in Izmit Gulf, Turkey. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 29(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10365
  15. EMEP/EEA. (2023). Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook. European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP)/European Environment Agency (EEA).
  16. ENTEC UK. (2005). Ship emissions inventory report for European Commission. Environmental and Engineering Consultancy (ENTEC) United Kingdom.
  17. ENTEC UK. (2007) New ship emissions inventory for the Mediterranean Sea. Environmental and Engineering Consultancy (ENTEC) United Kingdom.
  18. Eyring, V., Isaksen, I. S. A., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. J., Corbett, J. J., Endresen, Ø., Grainger, R. G., Moldanova, J., Schlager, H., & Stevenson, D. S. (2010). Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Shipping. Atmospheric Environment, 44(37), 4735-4771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.059
  19. Kılıç, A. (2009). Exhaust gas emissions from ships in Marmara Sea. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(2), 124–134.
  20. Koçak, E., & Kişi, H. (2015). Port privatizations: Expectations and actualization for port of Mersin. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 15, 279-296. https://doi.org/10.18092/ijeas.97554
  21. Manisalidis, I., Stavropoulou, E., Stavropoulos, A., & Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020). Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: A review. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 505570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014
  22. MarineTraffic. (2026). MarineTraffic: Global ship tracking intelligence. AIS Marine Traffic. [Online]. Retrieved on March 30, 2026, from https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:34.5/centery:36.8/zoom:9
  23. Merk, O. (2014). Shipping emissions in ports. OECD International Transport Forum. Discussion Paper No. 2014-20. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrw1ktc83r1-en
  24. Mersin Valiliği, (2025). Mersin provincial environmental status 2024 report. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti, Mersin Valiliği, Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği İl Müdürlüğü, ÇED ve Çevre İzinlerinden Sorumlu Şube Müdürlüğü. Retrieved on June 4, 2026, from https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/v2/ced/2026/01/Mersin_2024icdr-20260130161508.pdf
  25. Rodrigue, J. P., & Hesse, M. (2006). Global production networks and the role of logistics and transportation. Growth and Change, 37(4), 499-509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00337.x
  26. Rodrigue, J. P. (2010). Maritime transportation: Drivers for the shipping and port industries. OECD International Transport Forum. Discussion Paper No. 2010-2.
  27. Saraçoğlu, H., Deniz, C., & Kılıç, A. (2013). An investigation on the effects of ship sourced emissions in Izmir Port, Turkey. The Scientific World Journal, 2013(1), 218324. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/218324
  28. Sofiev, M., Winebrake, J. J., Johansson, L., Carr, E. W., Prank, M., Soares, J., Vira, J., Kouznetsov, R., Jalkanen, J. -P., & Corbett, J. J. (2018). Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs. Nature Communications, 9(1), 406. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02774-9
  29. Tichavska, M., & Tovar, B. (2015). Port-city exhaust emission model: An application to cruise and ferry operations in Las Palmas Port. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.021
  30. Tiken, E. D. (2022). Orta Doğu Limanları ve Mersin Limanı [MSc. Thesis. Marmara University].
  31. Tokuşlu, A. (2020). Creating an inventory of ship emissions of the Port of Bartın and calculating the environmental cost of port emissions. Ulusal Çevre Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 3(4), 208–218.
  32. Tokuşlu, A., & Burak, S. (2021). Examination of exhaust gas emissions of transit ships in the Istanbul Strait. Academic Platform – Journal of Engineering and Science, 9(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjes.705918
  33. Toscano, D. (2023). The impact of shipping on air quality in the port cities of the Mediterranean area: A review. Atmosphere, 14(7), 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071180
  34. Trozzi, C. (2010). Emission estimate methodology for maritime navigation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  35. Trozzi, C., & Vaccaro, R. (2006, June). Methodologies for estimating air pollutant emissions from ships: A 2006 update. Proceedings of the Environment & Transport: 2th International Scientific Symposium (including 15th conference Transport and Air Pollution), France, 108(425), pp. 12-14.
  36. UNCTAD. (2023). Review of maritime transport 2023: Towards a green and just transition. Stylus Publishing, LLC. UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
  37. Viana, M., Hammingh, P., Colette, A., Querol, X., Degraeuwe, B., de Vlieger, I., & Van Aardenne, J. (2014). Impact of maritime transport emissions on coastal air quality in Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 90, 96-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.046
  38. WHO (World Health Organization). (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. World Health Organization.