SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2004 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13

Violence in Football Spectators: Contributions and Limitations of Social Psychology

Futbolda Seyirci Şiddeti: Sosyal Psikolojinin Katkıları ve Sınırlılıkları

Aysel KAYAOĞLU GÜREL
Pages
79–101
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it also discussed the definitions of "spectator", "fan", "fanatic" and "hooligan".

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Football, which has occupied very important place almost in all societies in modern era, has also consistently been in news agenda due to its spectators' violent incidents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Social psychology discipline has only recently begun to pay attention to the issue of "football hooliganism" in Europe, predominantly in England, which is referred to as "terrace terror " or "terrace anarchy" in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it also discussed the definitions of "spectator", "fan", "fanatic" and "hooligan".
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Football, which has occupied very important place almost in all societies in modern era, has also consistently been in news agenda due to its spectators' violent incidents. Social psychology discipline has only recently begun to pay attention to the issue of "football hooliganism" in Europe, predominantly in England, which is referred to as "terrace terror " or "terrace anarchy" in Turkey. In this context, the general aim of the present article is to scrutinize contributions and limitations of social psychological literature in understanding of violence in football spectators. More specifically, first, the article considered classical aggression theories and social psychological crowd theories together with empirical studies in relation to sport spectators' aggression. Then, this work has focused on specific social psychological theories and research concerning violence in football spectators. In addition, it also discussed the definitions of "spectator", "fan", "fanatic" and "hooligan".

Özet

Günümüzde hemen bütün toplumlarda çok önemli bir yer işgal eden futbol, seyircilerinin şiddet olaylarıyla da sürekli haber gündeminde yer almaktadır. Sosyal psikoloji disiplini, başta ingiltere olmak üzere Avrupa'da "futbol holiganizmi", Türkiye'de "tribün terörü" ya da "tribün anarşisi" olarak adlandırılan olguya sadece son zamanlarda ilgi göstermeye başlamıştır. Bu bağlamda, sunulan makalenin genel olarak amacı, sosyal psikoloji literatürünün futbol seyircisindeki şiddeti anlamada katkılarını ve sınırlılıklarım incelemektir. Daha özgül olarak, makale, klasik saldırganlık kuramlarını ve sosyal psikoloji kitle kuramlarını, görgül çalışmalarla birlikte spor seyirciliği saldırganlığıyla ilişkili olarak ele almaktadır. Daha sonra, futbolda seyirci şiddeti ile ilgili özgül sosyal psikoloji kuram ve araştırmalara odaklanılmıştır. Bunlara ek olarak, "seyirci", "fan", "fanatik" ve "holigan" tanımlan da tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜREL, A. K. (2004). Violence in Football Spectators: Contributions and Limitations of Social Psychology. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13, 79–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/128574

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Arms, R. L., Russel, G.W., & Sandilans, M.L. (1979). Effects on hostility of spectators viewing aggressive sports. Review of Sport and Leisure, 4, 115-127.
  2. Armstrong, G., & Harris, R. (1991). Football hooligans: Theory and evidence. Sociological Review, 39, 427- 458. Avery, R., Bezmez, S., Edmonds, A., ve Yaylalı, M. (1995). Redhouse Ingilizce-Türkçe Sözlük (23. Basım), istanbul: Redhouse Yayınevi.
  3. Bakker, F. C., Whitin, H.T., & Brug, H. (1990). Sport psychology: Concepts and applications. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Bandura, A. (1978). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1992). Role of identification with a group, arousal, categorization processes, and self-esteem in spectators aggression, Human Relations, 45(10), 1013-1033.
  4. Berkowitz, L: (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Berkowitz, L., & LePage, A. (1997). Aggressive behavior: Weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli. In M. Hewstone, A. S. R. Manstead, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), The Blackwell reader in social psychology (pp. 452-463). Oxford: Blackwell. Cowie, A.P. (1989). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary (Fourth Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Coakley, J. J. (1990). Sport in society: Issues and controversies. St. Louis: Times Mirror/ Mosby. Diener, E. (1979). Deindividuation, self-awareness and disinhibition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1160-71,
  6. Dollard, J., Doob, L.W., Miller, N. H., Mowrer, O. H. M., & Sears, R.R. (1970). Frustration and aggression. In E. I. Megargee, & J. E. Hokanson (Eds.), The dynamics of aggression (pp. 22-32). New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
  7. Dunning, E., Murphy, P., & Williams, J. (1986). Spectator violence associated with football matches: A state of art review. Paper prepared for Sports Council on behalf of Council of Europe, Sir Norman Chester Centre for Football Research, University of Leicester, England. Dunning, E., Murphy, P., & Williams, J. (1988). The mots of football hooliganism. London: Routledge. Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382-389.
  8. Finn, G. (1994). Football violence: a societal psychological perspective. In R. Gulianotti, N. Bonney, & M. Hepworth (Eds.), Football, violence and social identity (pp.90-128). London: Routledge. Finn, G., & Gulianotti, R. (1998). Scottish fans, not Englis