Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2007 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 19

Commitnebt in Close Relationships: Cognitive and Behavioral Relationship Maintenance Mechanisms

Yakın İlişkilere Bağlanım: Bilişsel Davranışsal Olarak İlişkiyi Sürdürme Mekanizmaları

Pages
55–75
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, cognitive maintenance mechanisms (cognitive interdependence, positive illusion, derogating of tempting alternatives) that involve cognitive restructuring toward the goal of enhancing couple's well being and behavioral maintenances (accommodative behavior, willingness to sacrifice, forgiveness of betrayal) that involve shifts in behavior toward the goal of enhancing couple's well being are discussed in the light of research findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Even in the most gratifying relationships, couples sometimes encounter incompatible preferences, interests or relational problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In dilemmas of this sort, individuals often use cognitive and behavioral relationship maintenance mechanisms for maintaining the relationship.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, cognitive maintenance mechanisms (cognitive interdependence, positive illusion, derogating of tempting alternatives) that involve cognitive restructuring toward the goal of enhancing couple's well being and behavioral maintenances (accommodative behavior, willingness to sacrifice, forgiveness of betrayal) that involve shifts in behavior toward the goal of enhancing couple's well being are discussed in the light of research findings.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Even in the most gratifying relationships, couples sometimes encounter incompatible preferences, interests or relational problems. In dilemmas of this sort, individuals often use cognitive and behavioral relationship maintenance mechanisms for maintaining the relationship. Since commitment is a important variable in promoting persistence and maintenance mechanisms, a discussion of the most prominent models of commitment such as Johnson's tripartite model, Levinger's cohesiveness model, and Rusbul's investment model is taken as an objective of this article. On the other hand, cognitive maintenance mechanisms (cognitive interdependence, positive illusion, derogating of tempting alternatives) that involve cognitive restructuring toward the goal of enhancing couple's well being and behavioral maintenances (accommodative behavior, willingness to sacrifice, forgiveness of betrayal) that involve shifts in behavior toward the goal of enhancing couple's well being are discussed in the light of research findings.

Özet

En mutlu ilişkilerde bile, çiftler zaman zaman uyumsuz tercihler, ilgiler ya da ilişkisel sorunlarla karşılaşabilirler. Bireyler çoğunlukla yakın ilişkilere bağlanım sorunları yaşadıklarında, davranışsal ve bilişsel olarak ilişkiyi sürdürme mekanizmalarını kullanırlar. Bağlanım süreci, ilişkiyi sürdürme mekanizmalarının geliştirilmesinde önemli değişkenlerden biri olduğu için Johnson'un üçlü modeli, Levinger'in sargmlık modeli ve Rusbult'un yatırım modeli gibi en dikkat çekici bağlanım modellerinin incelenmesi, bu makalenin amaçlarından birini oluşturmaktadır. Diğer yandan, ilişkiyi davranışsal sürdürme mekanizmaları, çiftlerin iyilik hallerini ve ilişkilerini geliştirmek amacıyla davranışlarında gerekli değişiklikler yapmaları olarak tanımlanmaktadır. İlişkiyi bilişsel sürdürme mekanizmaları ise, çiftlerin iyilik hallerini geliştirmek için zihinsel süreçlerini yeniden yapılandırmalarıdır. Bu makalenin diğer bir temel amacı da, davranışsal (uyumsal davranış, özveri göstermeye isteklilik, ihaneti bağışlama) ve bilişsel (bilişsel karşılıklı bağımlılık, pozitif yanılsama, çekici seçenekleri küçümseme) olarak ilişkiyi sürdürme mekanizmalarını araştırma bulguları ışığında tartışmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKŞAHİN, A. (2007). Commitnebt in Close Relationships: Cognitive and Behavioral Relationship Maintenance Mechanisms. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 19, 55–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/128398

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adams, J.M., & Jones, W.H. (1999). Interpersonal commitment in historical perspective. In J.M. Adams & W.H. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 3-33). New York: Kluwer Academic. Agnew, C.R., Van Lange, P.A.M., Rusbult, C.E., & Langston, C.A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Pyschology, 74, 939-954.
  2. Amodia, D.M., & Showers, C.J. (2005). Similarity breeds liking revisited: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 817-836.
  3. Aron, A., & Aron, E. (1996). Self and self -expansion in relationships. In G.J.O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships (pp. 324-344).
  4. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum. Arriaga, X. B., & Rusbult, C.E. (1998). Standing in my partner's shoes: Partner perspective-taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 927-948.
  5. Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). The Psychology of interpersonal relationships U.S.A: Pearson Education. Buss, D.M., Shackelford, T.D., Kirkpatrick, L.A., Choe, J.C., Lim, H.K., Hasegawa, M, Hasegawa, T., & Bennett,K. (1999). Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about fidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in The United States; Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 6, 125-150.
  6. Buunk, B.P., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D.M. (1996).Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7, 359-379.
  7. Buunk, B.P., & VanYperen, N.W. (1989). Referential comparisons, relational comparisons and exchange orientations:Their relation to marital satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 710-718.
  8. Buunk, B. P., VanYperen, N.W., Taylor, S. E., & Collins, R.L. (1991). Social comparision and the drive upward revisited: Affliation as a response to marital stress. Europen Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 529-546.
  9. Büyükşahin, A. (2006). Yakın ilişkilerde bağlanım: yatırım modelinin bağlanma stilleri ve bazı ilişkisel değişkenler yönünden incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniveristesi, Ankara.
  10. Büyükşahin, A., Hasta, D., & Hovardaoğlu, S. (2005) İlişki İstikrarı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazılan, 8, 25-37.
  11. Chadwick- Jones, J. K. (1976). Social exchange theory: It's structure and influence in social Ps