SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Ürün karması kararları açısından geleneksel maliyet muhasebesi yöntemleri ile kısıtlar teorisinin karşılaştırılması

Comparison of the theory of constraints with the traditional cost accounting methods in respect to product mix decisions

Burcu DEMİREL UTKU
EMRE CENGİZ
Ayten ERSOY
Pages
317–331
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To this end, an application in a chemistry enterprise was executed to determine product mix decisions and their effect on profitability by comparing the theory of constraints variable costing method with Üıe full costing method in respect to the throughput approach, the contribution margin approach and the unit profit approach respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines Üıe importance of the theory of constraints compared to the conventional cost accounting in making adequate product mix decisions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study examines Üıe importance of the theory of constraints compared to the conventional cost accounting in making adequate product mix decisions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To this end, an application in a chemistry enterprise was executed to determine product mix decisions and their effect on profitability by comparing the theory of constraints variable costing method with Üıe full costing method in respect to the throughput approach, the contribution margin approach and the unit profit approach respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines Üıe importance of the theory of constraints compared to the conventional cost accounting in making adequate product mix decisions. To this end, an application in a chemistry enterprise was executed to determine product mix decisions and their effect on profitability by comparing the theory of constraints variable costing method with Üıe full costing method in respect to the throughput approach, the contribution margin approach and the unit profit approach respectively.

Özet

Bu çalışma, en uygun iiriin karması kararlarının alımında geleneksel muhasebe sistemine kıyasla kısıtlar teorisinin önemini sergilemektedir. Bu amaçla, ürün karması kararlarının belirlenmesinde bir kimya işletmesinde uygulama yapılmış ve bu ürün karması kararlarının karlılığı nasıl etkilediği; kısıtlar teorisinin süreç katkı muhasebesi yaklaşımının, değişken maliyet yönteminin katkı payı ile tam maliyet yönteminin birim kar yaklaşımlarıyla karşılaştırılması yöntemi ile detaylı bir şekilde incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UTKU, B. D., CENGİZ, E., ERSOY, A. (2011). Ürün karması kararları açısından geleneksel maliyet muhasebesi yöntemleri ile kısıtlar teorisinin karşılaştırılması. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 317–331. https://ajindex.com/articles/128392

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. ALBRIGHT, T., LAM, M. (2006). Managerial accounting and continuous improvement initiatives: a retrospective and framework. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18 (2), pp. 157-174.
  2. ATWATER, J.B., GAGNE, M.L. (1997). The theory of constraints versus contribution analysis for product mix decisions. Journal of Cost-Management, 11 (1), pp.6-15.
  3. BAXENDALE, S.J., RAJU, P.S. (2004). Using ABC to enhance throughput accounting: a strategic perspective. Cost Management,4 8, pp.31-38.
  4. BLACKSTONE, J. H. (2001). Theory of constraints - a status report. International Journal of Production Research, 39 (6), pp. 1053-1080.
  5. BLOUCHER, E.J., CHEN, K.H., LIN, T.W.IC. (2002). Cost management a strategic emphasis. McGraw-Hill Irwin. BÜYÜKMÎRZA, K. (2000).
  6. Maliyet ve yönetim muhasebesi, Ankara:
  7. Barış Kitap. CORBETT, T. (2003). Throughput accounting and ABC: the driving factors behind each methodology, Journal of Cost Management, (January/February), pp.37-45.
  8. DRAMAN, R.H., LOCKAMY, A.L., COX, J.F. (2002). Constraint-based accounting and its impact on organizational performance: a simulation of four common business strategies. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13 (4), pp. İ 90-200.
  9. DUGDALE, D., JONES, C. (1997). Accounting for throughput: techniques for performance measurement decisions. Management Accounting, December, pp.52-56.
  10. GRAVES, C.,GURD, B. (1998). Throughput accounting: a revolution in the making. Australian CPA, 68 (7), pp.36-38.
  11. KÜÇÜKSAVAŞ, N. (1992). Kısmi maliyet sistemleri ve katkı payı analizi. I. bs., Adana. KÜÇÜKSAVAŞ, N„ TANIŞ, V.N., ÜNAL, E. (2006). Kısıtlar teorisi ve değişken maliyet sistemi. Analiz, 6(15), pp. 17-58.
  12. LEE, T., PLENERT, G. (1996). Maximizing product mix profitability - what's the best analysis Tool. Production Planning c£ Control, 7 (6), pp.547-553.
  13. LOCKAMY, A. (2003). A constraint-based framework for strategic cost management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103 (8), pp.59l-599. LOUDERBACIC, J.G., PATTERSON, J.W. (1996). Theory of constraints versus traditional management accounting. Accounting Education, I (2), pp. 189-196.
  14. LUEBBE, R„ FINCH, B. (2001). Theory of constraints and linear programming: a comparison. International Journal of Production Research, 30 (6), pp.1471-1478.
  15. MABİN, V.J., BALDERSTONE, S.J. (2003). The performance of the theory of constraints methodology: analysis and discussion of successful TOC applications. International Journal q[Operations& Production Management, 23 (6), pp.568-595.
  16. MABIN, V.J., DA VIES J. (2003). Frame