SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Avrupa’da işsizlik ve iktisadi büyüme arasında uzun ve kısa dönemli etkiler

The long and short run effects between unemployment and economic growth in Europe

Ferda TATAROĞLU YERDELEN
Pages
99–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the validity of Okun’s Law and the significance of the relationship between economic growth rate and unemployment rate vary between countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, the movement of unemployment rate and the long and short term relationships between unemployment rate and economic growth rate are examined for individuals and pooled cases in European countries over the period 1977-2008.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Okun’s coefficients are also estimated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the validity of Okun’s Law and the significance of the relationship between economic growth rate and unemployment rate vary between countries.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, the movement of unemployment rate and the long and short term relationships between unemployment rate and economic growth rate are examined for individuals and pooled cases in European countries over the period 1977-2008. Several panel techniques are used for non-stationary panels and thereby some evidence are found for unemployment hysteresis in all European Countries. The Okun’s coefficients are also estimated. The results show that the validity of Okun’s Law and the significance of the relationship between economic growth rate and unemployment rate vary between countries.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 1977-2008 yılları arasında Avrupa ülkelerinde işsizlikteki hareketler ile işsizlik oranı ve iktisadi büyüme arasındaki kısa ve uzun dönemli ilişkiler ülkeler bazında ve tüm panelde incelenmiştir. Durağan olmayan panellere ilişkin çeşitli teknikler kullanılmış ve tüm Avrupa Ülkelerinde işsizlik histerisine ait bazı deliller bulunmuştur. Okun katsayısı da hesaplanmıştır. Sonuçlar, Okun Kanununun ve işsizlikle büyüme arasındaki ilişkinin anlamlılığının ülkeden ülkeye farlılıklar gösterdiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YERDELEN, F. T. (2011). Avrupa’da işsizlik ve iktisadi büyüme arasında uzun ve kısa dönemli etkiler. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 99–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/128306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. ADANU, K. (2005). A Cross-Province Comparison of Okun’s Coefficient for Canada. Applied Economics, 37, pp.561-570.
  2. ATTFIELD, C.L.F., SILVERSTONE, B. (1997). Okun’s Coefficient: A Comment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79 (2), pp.326-329.
  3. ATTFIELD, C.L.F., SILVERSTONE, B. (1998). Okun’s Law, Cointegration and Gap Variables. Journal of Macroeconomics, 20 (3), pp.625-637.
  4. ARESTIS, P., MARISCAL, I.B. (2000). OECD Unemployment: Structural Breaks and Stationary. Applied Economics, 32, pp.399-403.
  5. BARIŞIK, S., ÇEVİK, İ.E. (2008). Yapısal Kırılma Testleri İle Türkiye’de İşsizlik Histerisinin Analizi: 1923-2006 Dönemi. KMU İİBF Dergisi, 10 (14), pp.1-36.
  6. BLANCHARD, O.J., SUMMERS, L.H. (1986). Hysteresis and European Unemployment Problem. In S. Fischer (ed) NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  7. CHOI, I. (2001). Unit Root Tests For Panel Data. Journal Of International Money And Finance, 20, pp.249-272.
  8. CHRISTOPOULOS, D.K. (2004). The Relationship between Output and Unemployment: Evidence from Greek Regions. Regional Science, 83, pp.611-620.
  9. DEMİR, O., BAKIRCI, F. (2010). Türkiye’de İşsizlik Sorunu ve Büyüme-İşsizlik İlişkisi. [Available at]: _____http://www.asagihomurlu.bel.tr/fehmbakirci/1.pdf>, [Accessed: 02.03.2010].
  10. ENGLE, R.F., GRANGER, C.W.J. (1987). Co-integration and Error correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica, 55, pp.251-276.
  11. FREEMAN, D.G. (2001). Panel Tests of Okun’s Law for Ten Industrial Countries. Economic Inquiry, 39 (4), pp.511-523.
  12. FRIEDMAN, M. (1968). The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review, 58, pp.1-17.
  13. GABRISCH, H., BUSCHER, H. (2005). The Unemployment – Growth Relationship in Transition Countries. IWH-Discussion Papers, November 2005, 5, pp.1-26.
  14. GUSTAVSSON, M.,ÖSTERHOLM, P. (2006). Hysteresis and Nonlinearities in Unemployment Rates. Applied Economics Letters, 13 (9), pp.545-458.
  15. GÜRSEL, S. et al. (2002). Türkiye’de İşgücü Piyasası ve İşsizlik. TÜSİAD-T/2002/ 12-354.
  16. HADRI, K. (2000). Testing For Stationary in Heterogeneous Panel Data. Econometrics Journal, 3 (2), pp.148-161.
  17. HAHN, F. R. (2004). Long-run Homogenity of Labour Demand. Panel Evidence from OECD Countries. Applied Economics, 36 (11), pp.1199-1203.
  18. HARRIS, R., SILVERSTONE, B. (2001). Testing for Asymmetry in Okun’s Law: A Cross- Country Comparison. Economics Bulletin, 5 (2), pp.1-13.
  19. HUANG, H.R., LIN, S. (2006). A Flexible Nonlinear Inference to Okun’s Relationship. Applied Economics Letters, 13, pp.325-331.
  20. IM, K.S., PESA