Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Comparative Analysis of Previous Crises and 2008 Global Economic Crisis in terms of Enacted Monetary and Fiscal Policies

Uygulanan Para ve Maliye Politikaları Açısından Geçmiş Krizler ve 2008 Küresel Ekonomik Krizinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Pages
263–286
Publication Date
2014-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article the anatomy of these three crises were examined and some inferences were made with regard to the policies implemented during crises, the achievement of these policies and recent economic crisis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are many arguments asserting that there are similarities and differences between 1929 Great Depression, 2008 Global Crisis which is the biggest crisis experienced after Great Depression and 1997 Southeast Asian Financial Crisis in terms of their reasons and developments. 1929 Great Depression which broke out in an environment in which intergovernmental relations are based on policy and defense, and economy is at the second place in foreign policy planning has lasted longer because the measures were mainly national and public sector is lacking in power and planning to apply monetary and fiscal policies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However 1997 crisis and 2008 crisis has lasted relatively short thanks to the presence of regional and international institutions, and similar monetary and fiscal policy measures which are developed against crises by countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article the anatomy of these three crises were examined and some inferences were made with regard to the policies implemented during crises, the achievement of these policies and recent economic crisis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:1929 Economic Depression · 1997 Southeast Asian Crisis · 2008 Global Crisis

Abstract

There are many arguments asserting that there are similarities and differences between 1929 Great Depression, 2008 Global Crisis which is the biggest crisis experienced after Great Depression and 1997 Southeast Asian Financial Crisis in terms of their reasons and developments. 1929 Great Depression which broke out in an environment in which intergovernmental relations are based on policy and defense, and economy is at the second place in foreign policy planning has lasted longer because the measures were mainly national and public sector is lacking in power and planning to apply monetary and fiscal policies. However 1997 crisis and 2008 crisis has lasted relatively short thanks to the presence of regional and international institutions, and similar monetary and fiscal policy measures which are developed against crises by countries. In this article the anatomy of these three crises were examined and some inferences were made with regard to the policies implemented during crises, the achievement of these policies and recent economic crisis.

Özet

1929 Ekonomik Buhranı ile buhrandan sonra yaşanan en büyük kriz olarak nitelendirilen 2008 Küresel Krizi ve 1997 yılında Güneydoğu Asya’da başlayan kriz arasında; gerek çıkış nedenleri, gerekse de gelişimi açısından benzerlikler ve farklılıklar olduğuna dair literatürde birçok tartışma yer almıştır. Devletlerarası ilişkilerin daha çok siyaset ve savunma merkezli olduğu ve ekonominin devletlerin dış politika planlamasında ikincil konumda bulunduğu bir ortamda baş gösteren 1929 Büyük Buhranı, alınan önlemlerin daha çok ulusal karakterli olması ve kamu kesiminin para ve maliye politikası tedbirlerine başvuracak gücünün ve planlamasının eksikliği nedeniyle daha uzun sürmüş; buna rağmen 1997 Asya krizi ve günümüz ekonomik krizi, bölgesel ve uluslararası kurumların varlığı ve ülkelerin krize karşı geliştirdiği benzer para ve maliye politikası tedbirleri ile görece olarak daha kısa sürede atlatılmıştır. Makalede kısaca geçmişte yaşanan üç büyük krizin anatomisi ele alınarak kriz süresince uygulanan politikalar ve krizden çıkışta sağladığı başarı ile günümüz ekonomik krizine yönelik bir çıkarım yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, C. (2014). Comparative Analysis of Previous Crises and 2008 Global Economic Crisis in terms of Enacted Monetary and Fiscal Policies. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 263–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/128269

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ait-Sahalia, Y., Adnritzky, J., Jobst, A., Nowak, S., Tamirisa, N. (2010). “Market Responseto Policy Initiatives Duringthe Global Financial Crisis,” NBER Working Paper 15809, March. Avrupa Komisyonu (2011). Türkiye 2011 yılı İlerleme Raporu: Genişleme Stratejisi ve Başlıca Zorluklar 2011-2012,
  2. SEC (2011) 1201, Brüksel. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/AdaylikSureci/IlerlemeRapor lari/2011_ilerleme_raporu_tr.pdf Bernanke, B.S.,Parkinson, M. (1989). “Unemployment, Inflation, and Wages in the American Depression: Are There Lessonsfor Europe?”. AEA Papersand Proceedings, 79(2): 210-214.
  3. Bernanke, B.S. (1983). “Non-Monetary Effects of the Financial Crisis in the Propagation of the Great Depression”.The American Economic Review, 73(3): 257-276.
  4. Bocutoğlu, E.,Ekinci, A. (2009). “Genel Teori, Küresel Krizler ve Yeniden Maliye Politikası”, Maliye Dergisi, 156 (Ocak-Haziran): 66-82.
  5. Brown, E.C. (1956). “Fiscal Policy in the Thirties: A Reappraisal”, American Economic Review, December, 46(5): 857-79.
  6. Brownlee, W.E. (2000). The Public Sector, in The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, Stanley L. Engermanand Robert E. Gallman (eds), Volume 3, Cambridge University Press, 1200 pages. Colander, D.,Goldberg, M., Haas, A., Juselius, K., Kirman, A., Lux, T., Sloth, B. (2009). “The Financial Crisisandthe Systemic Failure of the Economics Profession”, Critical Review, 21(2&3): 249–267.
  7. Congressional Budget Office (2010).Estimated Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on Employment and Economic Output from October 2009 through December 2009.February. Delice, G. (2003). “Finansal Krizler: Teorik ve Tarihsel Bir Perspektif”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(Ocak-Haziran): 57-81.
  8. DPT (2009). 2009 Yılı Katılım Öncesi Ekonomik Program. DPT, Ankara.
  9. Eggertsson, G.B. (2008). “Great Expectations and the End of the Depression”, American Economic Review, 98(4): 1476-1516.
  10. Eichengreen, B.,Irwin, D.A. (2010). “The Slideto Protectionism in the Great Depression: Who Succumbedand Why?”, The Journal of Economic History, 70(4): 871-897.
  11. Eichengreen, B.,Sachs, J. (1985). “Exchange Ratesand Economic Recovery in the 1930s”, TheJournal of Economic History, 45(4): 925-946.
  12. Erdoğdu, M.M. (2010). Neo-liberal İktisatta Sonun Başlangıcı ve Keynezyen İktisadın Reenkarnasyonu. H. Kapucu, M. Aydın, İ. Şiriner, F. Morady ve Ü. Çetin (ed.). Politik İktisat ve Adam Smith. Yön Yayınları. ss. 329 - 358. Frenkel, R., Rapetti, M. (2009). “