SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

A Research on Identifying Core Competency Gap (A Sample of Group of Companies)

Temel Yetkinlik Açığının Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma (Şirketler Grubu Örneği)

Ömer Faruk ÜNAL
Pages
129–146
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that there are some gaps in all core competencies at various degrees.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examined core competencies’ gaps at organizational level and whether perceptions of the core competencies change according to the demographic variables of the incumbents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was carried out in a group of companies which contains fifteen firms in Istanbul.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that there are some gaps in all core competencies at various degrees.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Core competencies · perceived competency gap

Abstract

This study examined core competencies’ gaps at organizational level and whether perceptions of the core competencies change according to the demographic variables of the incumbents. The research was carried out in a group of companies which contains fifteen firms in Istanbul. Data were gathered by the structured questionnaire. Parametric methods were used for the analyses of data. The findings indicate that there are some gaps in all core competencies at various degrees. Perceptions of the core competencies’ gap at organizational level differ according to age, job tenure, status, salary, and education level of the incumbents.

Özet

Bu çalışmada örgütsel düzeyde temel yetkinlik açıkları ve temel yetkinlik açığının çalışanların demografik değişkenlerine göre farklılık gösterip göstermedikleri araştırılmaktadır. Çalışma, merkezi İstanbul’da bulunan, on beş şirketin bağlı bulunduğu bir şirketler topluluğunda gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler yapılandırılmış anket yöntemi ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde parametrik testler kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre temel yetkinliklerde çeşitli düzeylerde değişen yetkinlik açığı görülmektedir. Örgütsel düzeyde algılanan temel yetkinlik açığı çalışanların yaş, kıdem, statü, ücret ve eğitim değişkenlerine göre farklılık göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, Ö. F. (2013). A Research on Identifying Core Competency Gap (A Sample of Group of Companies). Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 129–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/128221

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Agut, S., Grau, R. (2002). Managerial Competency Needs and Training Requests: the Case of the Spanish TouristIndustry, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1): 31-51.
  2. Agut, S., Grau, R., Peiró, J.M. (2003). Individualand Contextual Influences on Managerial Competency Needs, Journal of Management Development, 22(10): 906-918.
  3. Ashkezari, M.J.D., Aeen, M.N. (2012). Using Competency Modelsto Improve HRM, Ideal Type of Management, 1(1): 59-68.
  4. Athey, T.R., Orth, M.S. (1999). Emerging Competency Methods for the Future, Human Resource Management, 38(3): 215-226.
  5. Barriocanal, E.G., Sicilia, M.A., Alonso, S.S. (2012). Computing with Competencies: Modelling Organizational Capacities, Expert Systems with Applications, 39: 12310-12318.
  6. Blancero, D., Boroski, J., Dyer, L. (1996), Key Competencies for a Transformed Human Resource Organization: Results of a Field Study, Human Resource Management,35(3), 383-403.
  7. Brockbank, W., Ulrich, D., Beatty, R.W. (1999). HR Professional Development: Creating the Future Creators at the University of Michigan Business School, Human Resource Management, 38(2): 111- 117. Budak, G. (2008). Yetkinliğe Dayalı İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, 1. Baskı,
  8. İzmir,
  9. Barış Yayınları.
  10. Cardy, R.L., Selvarajan, T.T. (2006). Competencies: Alternative Frameworks for Competitive Advantage, Business Horizons, 49: 235- 245. Currie, G., Darby, R. (1995). Competence-based Management Development: Rhetoric and Reality, Journal of European Industrial Training, 19(5): 11-18.
  11. Deist, F.D., Winterton, J. (2005). What is Competence?, Human Resource Development International, 8(1): 27-46.
  12. Dessler, G. (2007), Human Resource Management, 11 Baskı,
  13. New Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall. Doğan, N., Başokçu, T. O. (2010). İstatistik Tutum Ölçeği İçin Uygulanan Faktör Analizi ve Aşamalı Kümeleme Analizi Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması, Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 1(2): 65-71.
  14. Draganidis, F., Mentzas, G. (2006). Competency Based Management: a Review of Systems and Approaches, Information Management & Computer Security, 14(1): 51-64.
  15. Enis, M.E. (2008). Competency Models: A Review of the Literature and The Role of the Employment and Training Administration (ETA), http://www.careeronestop.org/COMPETENCYMODEL/info_document s/OPDRLiteratureReview.pdf, (10.11.2012)
  16. Gangani, N., McLean, G.N., Braden, R.A. (2006). A Competency-Based Human Resource Development Strategy, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(1): 127-140.
  17. Govender, P., Parumasur, S. (2010), Evaluati