SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2008 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 22

Organizational identity in a teacher sample and the relationships between the dimension of organizational identity and organizational attitudes and perceptions

Öğretmenlerde kimliklenme ve kimliklenmenin işe yönelik tutum ve algıları yordaycılığı

NİHAL MAMATOĞLU
Pages
47–65
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that Multi Faced Organizational Identification Scale has 6 factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study is to investigate the multiple structure of organizational identity in a teacher sample and to investigate the relationships between the dimensions of organizational identity and organizational attitudes and perceptions (j ob satisfaction and perception of organizational culture) in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 194 teacher including 111 females and 83 males were recruited from 14 different schools (pre and high schools).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that Multi Faced Organizational Identification Scale has 6 factors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the multiple structure of organizational identity in a teacher sample and to investigate the relationships between the dimensions of organizational identity and organizational attitudes and perceptions (j ob satisfaction and perception of organizational culture) in Turkey. A total of 194 teacher including 111 females and 83 males were recruited from 14 different schools (pre and high schools). Data were collected by Multi Faced Organizational Identification, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Culture Typology scales. Results indicated that Multi Faced Organizational Identification Scale has 6 factors. In addition, it was found that the organizational identification dimensions predicted the perceptions of organizational culture of the employees. For example, self-categorization as a teacher subscale predicted achievement, support, and hierarchical culture perceptions. Similarly, organizational identification subscale predicted the job satisfaction of employees. For example, team

Özet

Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de öğretmen örnekleminde örgütsel kimliklenmenin çoklu yapısı test edilmekte ve örgütsel kimliklenme boyutlarının örgütsel tutum ve algıları (örgüt kültürü algısı ve iş doyumu) yordayıcılığı incelenmektir. Çalışmaya Bolu ili içinde bulunan 14 farklı okuldan (ilköğretim ve liseden), 111 kadın 83 erkek toplam 194 öğretmen denek olarak katılmıştır. Veriler, Çoklu Örgütsel Kimliklenme, İş Doyumu ve Örgütsel Kültür Tipi ölçekleri aracılığı ile toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, Çoklu Örgütsel Kimliklenme Ölçeği'nin örgütsel kimliklenmeyi ölçmeye yönelik 6 alt faktörü olduğuna işaret etmiştir. Ayrıca, örgütsel kimliklenme alt boyutlarının çalışanın örgüt kültürü algılarını yordadığı bulunmuştur. Örneğin, kendini öğretmen olarak sınıflandırma alt ölçeği başarı, destek ve hiyerarşi kültürü algılarını yordamaktadır. Benzer şekilde, örgütsel kimliklenme alt boyutları çalışanın iş doyumunu da yordamaktadır. Örneğin, takım kimliklenmesi alt ölçeği iş yeri politikaları, kişilerarası ilişkiler ve kontrol ve özerklik alt ölçeklerini yordamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAMATOĞLU, N. (2008). Organizational identity in a teacher sample and the relationships between the dimension of organizational identity and organizational attitudes and perceptions. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 22, 47–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/128188

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abrams, D., Ando, K. ve Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictor of workers' turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1027-1039.
  2. Ashforth, B. ve Johnson, S. A. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. M. A. Hogg ve D. J. Terry, (Ed.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts içinde (1-48).
  3. Philadelphia, USA, Psychology Pres. Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
  4. Batıgün, A. D. ve Şahin, N. H. (2006). İş stresi ve sağlık psikolojisi araştırmaları için iki ölçek: A-tipi kişilik ve iş doyumu. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, i 7(1), 32-45.
  5. Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M. ve Gilbert, N. L. (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for the job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 464-482.
  6. Brewer, M. B. ve Silver, M. D. (2000). Group distinctiveness, social identification, and collective mobilization. S. Stryker, T. Owens ve R White, (Ed.), Self, identity, and social movements içinde (153-171).
  7. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Pres. Bond, M. H. ve Cheung, T. (1983). Colege students' self concept: The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 153-171.
  8. Carpenter, S. (2000). Effects of cultural tightness and collectivism on self-concept and causal attributions. Cross-Cultural Reasearch, 34, 38-56.
  9. Chatman, J. 1991. Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484.
  10. Christ, O., van Dick, R., Wagner, U. ve Stellmacher, J. (2003). When teachers go the extra-mile: Foci of organizational identification as determinants of different forms of organizational citizenship behavior among school. teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 329-341.
  11. Coşkun, H. (2005). Sosyal kimlik ile rol üstlenmenin bireysel beyin fırtınasında üretkenliğe etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 20 (56), 119-132.
  12. Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 124-131.
  13. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradi