Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

The importance of technological innovation from the perspective of export performance: The case of Turkish manufacturing industry

Türkiye’de enflasyon hedeflemesi altinda sosyal refahtaki değişim ihracat performansı açısından teknolojik yeniliğin önemi: Türkiye imalat sanayi örneği

Pages
147–160
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the effect of the R&D expenses on export performance was substantially lagged.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Technological innovations are important with regard to increasing export performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the results that had been reached in the empirical literature investigating the effects of R&D expenses which is accepted as input of technological innovation on the export performance are not compatible with each other.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the effect of the R&D expenses on export performance was substantially lagged.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Technological innovations are important with regard to increasing export performance. However, the results that had been reached in the empirical literature investigating the effects of R&D expenses which is accepted as input of technological innovation on the export performance are not compatible with each other. The purpose of this study is to contribute to the discussion in the literature. Between years 1995–2005, a panel data analysis was used to test the relationship between Turkish manufacturing industries’ exports, and the R&D expenses. It was found that the effect of the R&D expenses on export performance was substantially lagged.

Özet

Teknolojik yenilikler ihracat performansının arttırılmasında önemlidir. Fakat teknolojik yeniliklerin girdisi olarak kabul edilen Araştırma-Geliştirme (Ar-Ge) harcamalarının ihracat performansı üzerindeki etkilerini araştıran ampirik literatürde birbiriyle uyumlu olmayan sonuçlara ulaşılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, literatürdeki tartışmaya katkı sağlamaktır. Çalışmada 1995–2005 yılları arasında Türkiye imalat sanayi sektörlerinin yapmış oldukları ihracat ile Ar–Ge harcamaları arasındaki ilişki panel veri analizi ile test edilmiştir. Ar-Ge harcamalarının ihracat üzerindeki etkisinin daha çok gecikmeli olarak ortaya çıktığı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZAY, N., DEMİR, M., YILDIRIM, E. (2012). The importance of technological innovation from the perspective of export performance: The case of Turkish manufacturing industry. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 147–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/128184

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. ATİK, H. (2005). Yenilik ve Ulusal Rekabet Gücü. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  2. BROUWER, E., KLEINKNECHT, A. (1996). Firm size, small business presence and sales of ınnovative products: A micro-econometric analysis. Small Business Economics. 8, 189- 201.ss. CASSIMAN, B., MARTINEZ–ROS, E. (2004). Innovation and Exports: Evidence from spanish manufacturing. IESE Working Papers, [Erişim Adresi]: _____http://193.174.6.11/mp/sem/past/2008/sfb_cassiman.pdf> [Erişim Tarihi: 05.09.2008].
  3. ÇALIPINAR, H., BAÇ, U. (2007). Kobi’lerde inovasyon yapmayı etkileyen faktörler ve bir alan araştırması. Ege Akademik Bakış, 7(2), 445– 458.ss. DOSI, G., SOETE, L. (1988). Technical change and international trade. Giovanni D. vd. (Ed.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Printer Publishers, London, 401–431.ss. FREEMAN, C., SOETE, L. (2003). Yenilik iktisadı. (Çev.: E. TÜRKCAN), TÜBİTAK Yayınları,
  4. İkinci Basım, Ankara.
  5. GALENDE, J. (2006). Analysis of technological innovation from business economics and management, Technovation. 26, 300–311.ss. GIACCHERO, A., DONNINI, N., MARTIN, F. (2006). Innovation and competitiveness in local SMEs: Characteristics of firms, entrepreneurs, environment and their interrelationships. CANTNER, U., MALERBA, F. (Eds.), Innovation, industrial dynamics and structural transformation: Schumpeterian legacies, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 173-186.ss. GOURLAY, A., SEATON, J. (2004). Explaining the decision to export: Evidence from UK firms. Applied Economics Letters, 11(3), 153-158.ss. GRUBER, W., MEHTA, D., VERNON, R. (1967). The R&D factor in ınternational trade and ınternational ınvestment of united states ındustries. The Journal of Political Economy, 75(1), 20–37.ss. HIRSCH, S., BIJAOUI, I. (1985). R&D intensity and export performance: A micro view. Review of World Economics, 121(2), 238-251.ss. HUMPHREY, T.M. (2004). Ricardo versus Wicksell on job losses and technological change. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 90(4), 5-23.ss. KIRBACH, M., SCHMIEDEBERG, C. (2008). Innovation and export performance: Adjustment and remaining differences in East and West German manufacturing. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(5), 435-457.ss. LEVIN, A., LIN, C., CHU, S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite- sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1-24.ss. LANDESMANN, M., PFAFFERMAYR, M. (1997). Technological competition and trade performance. Applied Economics, 29(2), 179-196.ss. OSLO MANUAL (2005). The measure