Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 52 Sayı: 3

Multilingual Perspective in Language Teaching

Dil Öğretiminde Çok Dilli Bakış Açısı

Gülşat Bican(MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI)0000-0002-2651-2261
Pages
943–966
Publication Date
2019-12-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, using of worldwide bilingual-/multilingual educational practices and disclosing the effectiveness of the multilingual approach to develop programs for teaching of multiple languages in Turkey is suggested.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to reconsider the prevalent strategies used for teaching more than one language in the context of multi-lingualism and to introduce new approaches in the light of developments in the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, the current condition in the interdisciplinary area of language education and related approaches required to be developed will be discussed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, using of worldwide bilingual-/multilingual educational practices and disclosing the effectiveness of the multilingual approach to develop programs for teaching of multiple languages in Turkey is suggested.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:iki dillilik · bütüncül yaklaşım · Çok dillilik

Abstract

This study aims to reconsider the prevalent strategies used for teaching more than one language in the context of multi-lingualism and to introduce new approaches in the light of developments in the literature. Thus, the current condition in the interdisciplinary area of language education and related approaches required to be developed will be discussed. The study is a descriptive one and is based on literatute review. Using a traditional literature review, an examination of a complex set of up-to-date studies published by academically reliable and competent specialists has been conducted. Some specialists suggest focusing on multilingualism as an alternative to conventional approaches that emphasize the separation of languages in learning more than one language. This suggestion is a result of a holistic approach based on the research and developments in the field of bilingualism. Accordingly, the integration of new knowledge to the existing cognitive structures of an individual is crucial, as old information is the basis of interpreting new information. Interlingual connections combining different languages and a curriculum presenting course contents in different languages constitute a basic framework of this approach. As a result, using of worldwide bilingual-/multilingual educational practices and disclosing the effectiveness of the multilingual approach to develop programs for teaching of multiple languages in Turkey is suggested.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı dil öğretiminde kullanılan tek dilli modeli, çok dillilik bağlamında yeniden ele almak ve alanyazındaki gelişmeler ışığında yeni yaklaşımları tanıtmaktır. Böylece disiplinlerarası bir bilim alanı olan dil öğretiminde var olan durum ve geliştirilmesi gereken yaklaşımlar tartışılabilecektir. Çalışma, betimsel bir araştırmadır ve alanyazın taramasıdır. Alanyazın tarama tekniklerinden geleneksel tarama ile yürütülen bu araştırmada, birden çok dil öğretimi ile ilgili alandaki temel kavramlar üzerinde, belirlenen amaç çerçevesinde inceleme yapılmıştır. Yapılan incelemede dil öğretimi alanındaki uzmanların dil öğretiminde, dillerin ayrılmasını savunan geleneksel yaklaşımlara seçenek olarak çok dilliliğe odaklanmayı önerdiği görülmüştür. Bu öneri, iki dillilik konusundaki araştırma ve gelişmelerden hareketle ortaya konulan bütüncül yaklaşımın sonucudur. Buna göre dillerin öğretiminde yeni bilgiyi var olan bilişsel yapılarla bütünleştirmek önemlidir. Böylece diller arası aktarım sağlanarak zayıf dilin gelişmesinde daha fazla yol alınabilir. Bu yaklaşımın temel çerçevesini, dil öğretiminde farklı dilleri bütünleştiren diller arası bağlantılar ve ders içeriklerini farklı dillerde sunan öğretim programı oluşturmaktadır. Bu çerçeve, iki dilli eğitimin güçlü modellerinde uygulanan çerçeve ile ortak özellikler taşımaktadır. Sonuç olarak, Türkiye’de birden çok dil öğretimine yönelik programların geliştirilmesinde çok dilli yaklaşımın etkililiğini ortaya çıkararak dünyadaki iki dilli/çok dilli eğitim uygulamalarından yararlanılması önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bican, G. (2019). Multilingual Perspective in Language Teaching. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 52 Sayı: 3, 943–966. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.532374

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Baker, C. (2011b). Foundations of bilingual education (5th Edition). Bristol, New York, Ontario: Multilingual Matters.
  2. Baker, C. (2011a). Anne-babalar ve öğretmenler için rehber ikidilli eğitim. İstanbul: Heyamola.
  3. Baker, C., & Prys-Jones, S. (1998). Encyclopedia of bilingualism and bilingual education. Clevedon; Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
  4. Benson, C. (2009). Designing effective schooling in multilingual contexts: The strengths and limitation of bilingual ‘models.’ Mohanty, A., Panda, M., Phillipson, R., &
  5. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (Eds.). Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local. (ss. 63-81). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  6. Collier, V.P. (1989). How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in second language. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 509-531.
  7. Cenoz, J. and Gorter, D. (2011). Focus on Multilingualism: A Study of Trilingual Writing. Modern Language Journal 95: 356–369.
  8. Cenoz, J. and Gorter, D. (2015). Towards a holistic approach in the study of multilingual education. Multilingual education: navigating between language learning and translanguaging, J. Cenoz ve D. Gorter (Ed.), 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57 (3): 402–423.
  10. Cook, V. (2013). Multi-competence. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition, P. Robinson (Ed.), 447–451. New York: Routledge.
  11. Council of Europe. (2009). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): Learning, Teaching, Assessment, Modern Language Division. Strasbourg.
  12. Creese, A. ve Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the Bilingual Classroom: A Pedagogy for Learning and Teaching? The Modern Language Journal 94: 103–115.
  13. Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of first- and second-language-proficiency in bilingual children. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (s. 70-89). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon [England]; Buffalo [N.Y.]: Multilingual Matters.
  15. Cummins, J. (2001a). Bilingual children's mother tongue: why is it important for education? Sprogforum, 19 (7), 15-20.
  16. Cummins, J. (2001b). Negotiating Identities: Education for Empowerment in a Diverse Society. Los Angeles, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education Press, Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  17. Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking Monolingual Instructional Strategies in Multilingual Classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 10: 221–240.
  18. Cummins, J., & Hornberger, N. H. (2008). Bilingual education (2.baskı). New York: Springer.
  19. Cummins, J. (2014). To what extent are Canadian second language policies evidence-based? reflections on the intersections of research and policy. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 358.
  20. Cummins, J., and R. Persad. (2014). Teaching Through a Multilingual Lens: The Evolution of EAL Policy and Practice in Canada. Education Matters 2: 3–40.
  21. Cummins, J. (2015). Intercultural education and academic achievement: a framework for school-based policies in multilingual schools, Intercultural Education 26 (6): 455-468.
  22. Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (Ed.). (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
  23. ECML - European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe (2018). https://www.ecml.at/Home/tabid/59/language/en-GB/Default.aspx
  24. Field, F. W. (2011). Key Concepts in Bilingualism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Freeman, R. D. (1998). Bilingual education and social change. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  26. Hamers, J. F., & Blanc, M. H. A. (2000). Bilinguality and bilingualism (2.baskı). Cam¬bridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Haznedar, B. (2012). Türkiye’de yabancı dil öğretimi: İlköğretim yabancı dil programı. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 21 (2), 15-28.
  28. Helot, C. ve Cavalli, M. (2017). Bilingual Education in Europe. Encyclopedia of Bilingual and Multilingual Education (O. Garcia & A. Lin & S. May editors) Springer International Publishing.
  29. Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying Bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual Life and Reality. USA: Harvard University Press.
  31. Grosjean, F. Li, P. (2013) The Psycholinguistics of Bilingualism. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  32. Işık, A. (2008). Yabancı dil eğitimimizdeki yanlışlar nereden kaynaklanıyor? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, Sayı: 4. No: 2.
  33. Kramsch, C. (2012). Authenticity and Legitimacy in Multilingual SLA. Critical Multilingualism Studies. 1: 107–128.
  34. Lightbown, P. M., ve Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (3. baskı). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  35. Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25(5): 605–621. http://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.795574
  36. May, S. (2008). Bilingual/Immersion Education: What the Research Tells Us. J. Cum¬mins, & Hornberger, N. H. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education (2. baskı, Vol. Bilingual Education, ss. 19-34): Springer.
  37. MEB – Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). İngilizce dersi öğretim programı. İlköğretim. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=327
  38. MEB - Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). İngilizce dersi öğretim programı. Ortaöğretim. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=342
  39. UNESCO (2003). Education in a multilingual world. UNESCO Education Position Paper. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001297/129728e.pdf