Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Rental Social Housing: A New Method in Turkey For Solution Of Housing Problems

Kiralık Sosyal Konutlar: Türkiye’de Barınma Sorununun Çözümü İçin Yeni Bir Yöntem

Pages
88–121
Publication Date
2018-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, Explained the necessity of rental social housing policies against the problem of housing of the poor in our country and policy suggestions have been made for this.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The housing problem of the poor in our country ise increasing constantly due to; income inequality, population growth and rapid urbanization processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Social housing applications sold by the Housing Development Administration (TOKI) is insufficient to solve this problem.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, Explained the necessity of rental social housing policies against the problem of housing of the poor in our country and policy suggestions have been made for this.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Poverty · Housing Problem · TOKİ

Abstract

The housing problem of the poor in our country ise increasing constantly due to; income inequality, population growth and rapid urbanization processes. Social housing applications sold by the Housing Development Administration (TOKI) is insufficient to solve this problem. Mass Housing Administration will change the method of housing against the poor's housing problems. Therefore, the issue of the article was chosen as rental social housing. In this context, rental social housing policies in the Netherlands, Austria, England and China have been examined. It has been tried to explain with legislation and statistics that approaches to rental social housing, physical conditions of rental social housing, conditions for benefiting from rental social housing and financing of rental social housing. Finally, Explained the necessity of rental social housing policies against the problem of housing of the poor in our country and policy suggestions have been made for this.

Özet

Ülkemizde yoksulların barınma sorunu; gelir adaletsizlikleri, nüfus artışı, hızlı kentleşme süreçleri gibi nedenlerle sürekli olarak artmaktadır. Toplu Konut İdaresinin (TOKİ) mülk edindiren sosyal konut uygulamaları ise bu sorunu çözmekte yetersiz kalmaktadır. Yoksulların barınma sorunlarına karşı yöntem değişikliğine gidecek olan Toplu Konut İdaresi’nin uygulamayı planladığı kiralık sosyal konutlar, çalışmanın konusunu oluşturmaktadır. Bu bağlamda Hollanda, Avusturya, İngiltere ve Çin’deki kiralık sosyal konut politikaları incelenmiştir. Söz konusu ülkelerdeki kiralık sosyal konuta olan yaklaşımlar, kiralık sosyal konutların fiziki durumları, kiralık sosyal konutlardan yararlanma koşulları ve kiralık sosyal konutların finansmanı gibi konular ilgili mevzuat ve istatistiki veriler ışığında anlatılmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmada son olarak ülkemizde yoksulların barınma sorununun çözümü için kiralık sosyal konut politikalarının gerekliliği ortaya koyulmuş ve hayata geçirilmesi planlanan bu uygulamalara ilişkin politika önerilerinde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKALIN, M. (2018). Rental Social Housing: A New Method in Turkey For Solution Of Housing Problems. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 88–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/128016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı (2015). 2015 Yılı İdari Faaliyet Raporu. Aktan C. C.( 2002).
  2. Yoksullukla Mücadele Stratejileri, Hak İşçi Sendikaları Konfederasyonu Yayınları,
  3. Ankara.
  4. Amann, W. ve Mundt, A. (2006). The Austrian System of Social Housing Finance, Institute for Real Estate Construction and Housing Ltd, IIBW, Vienna. Baker, T.F.T. (1998). Bethnal Green: Building and Social Conditions after 1945 Social and Cultural Activities, in A History of the County of Middlesex, (11):135-147.
  5. BAWO (2008). Austria – National Report 2008: People Who Are Homeless Can Be Housed by Christian Perl, Austrian Umbrella Organisation for Organisations Working with the Homeless, BAWO Boelhouwer, P. J. (2002). Trends in Dutch Housing Policy and the Shifting Position of The Social Rented Sector, Urban Studies, (39:2): 219- 235. Cahill, N. (2014), Financing of Social Housing in Selected European Counties, NESC Secretariat Papers Paper No. 11. Clarke ve E. S. McLaughlin, New Manageralism, New Welfare? London, Sage Publications:137-151. CECODHAS, (2013).
  6. Housing Europe Observatory, Final Report. Çoban, A. N.(2012). Cumhuriyetin İlanından Günümüze Konut Politikası, Ankara Üniversitesi, SBF Dergisi, 67 (3), Ankara: 75-108.
  7. Deutsch E. ve Lawson J. (2013). International Measures To Channel İnvestment Towards Affordable Rental Housing: Austrian Case Study, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. Elsinga, M. ve Wassenberg, F. (2007). Social Housing in the Netherlands, içinde: Social housing in Europe, C. Whitehead & K. Scanlon (eds.), London School of Economics, London. European Commission (2010).The Social Situation in the European Union 2009,Publications Office of the European Union: 107-129.
  8. Geray, C. (2007),
  9. Geçmişi Korumak Geleceği Tasarlamak, Toplumsal Konut Yöneltisi ve TOKİ’nin Tutum ve Yönelimlerindeki Son Değişiklikler, Kent ve Planlama, Mengi A.(Editör). İmge Kitabevi,
  10. Ankara.
  11. Golland A. ve Gillen, M. (2004). Housing Need Housing Demand and Housing Supply. Edt. A. Golland ve R. Blake. Housing Development. London. Hasol, D. (1995).
  12. Ansiklopedik Mimarlık Sözlüğü, YEM Yayın, İstanbul Housing Europe (2015). The State of Housing, in the EU 2015, the European Federation for Public, Cooperative and Social Housing Brussels. Investing in theDutch Housing Market, 2014
  13. Report. Keleş, R. (2004),
  14. Kentleşme Politikası, İmge Kitabevi,
  15. Ankara.
  16. King, P. (2006).
  17. Choise And The End Of Social Housing, The Institute Of Economic Affairs, London. Kömürlü, R. (2006). Ülkemizde T