SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

The Share of Transport Modes in Domestic and International Trade: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Application

Uluslararası ve Yurtiçi Ticarette Taşıma Türlerinin Payı: Bir Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) Uygulaması

Yusuf BAYRAKTUTAN
Mehmet ÖZBİLGİN
Pages
405–436
Publication Date
2015-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, all modes of transportation was examined, and the general state of the market for each type of transport was reviewed, and transportation systems were compared according to their share of foreign trade and an application was carried out by using Analytic Hierarchy Process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Transportation systems have different network and instrument combination that are closely related to the economic activities, mainly commercial ones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In particular, the unavoidable increase of road transport of passengers and freight imposes heavy costs on the economy and disrupt the balance in the use of the transportation system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, all modes of transportation was examined, and the general state of the market for each type of transport was reviewed, and transportation systems were compared according to their share of foreign trade and an application was carried out by using Analytic Hierarchy Process.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Transportation Modes · Freight Transportation · International Trade

Abstract

Transportation systems have different network and instrument combination that are closely related to the economic activities, mainly commercial ones. Every transportation mode has its own advantage based upon cost, security, speed, capacity and bureaucracy. Sea and road transport is more widely used and air and rail's share is low in Turkish foreign trade transportation. In particular, the unavoidable increase of road transport of passengers and freight imposes heavy costs on the economy and disrupt the balance in the use of the transportation system. A partial shift from road transport to rail and maritime is possible and necessary. In this study, all modes of transportation was examined, and the general state of the market for each type of transport was reviewed, and transportation systems were compared according to their share of foreign trade and an application was carried out by using Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Özet

Farklı ağ ve araçlar kombinasyonuna sahip olan ulaştırma sistemleri, başta ticaret olmak üzere iktisadi faaliyetler ile yakından ilgilidir. Alternatif ulaştırma türlerinin, güvenlik, hız, kapasite, bürokrasi ve maliyet bağlamında avantajlı olduğu yönler bulunmaktadır. Türkiye dış ticaretinde deniz ve karayolu taşımacılığı ağırlık taşımakta; hava ve demiryolu taşımacılığı önemli bir yer tutmamaktadır. Yurtiçi yolcu ve yük taşımacılığında karayolu payının sürekli artışı, ülke ekonomisine ağır maliyetler yüklemekte ve ulaştırma sisteminin kullanımındaki dengeyi bozmaktadır. Karayolu taşımacılığının demiryolu ve denizyolu taşımacılığına kaydırılması mümkün ve gereklidir. Bu çalışmada, ulaştırma türleri incelenmiş ve her ulaştırma türü için pazarın genel durumunun gözden geçirilmesini takiben, dış ticaret paylarına göre karşılaştırması yapılmış ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi kullanılarak bir uygulama gerçekleştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAKTUTAN, Y., ÖZBİLGİN, M. (2015). The Share of Transport Modes in Domestic and International Trade: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Application. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 405–436. https://ajindex.com/articles/127911

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ay, S. (2008). Ulaştırma Sistemlerinin Çevresel Etkileri. 3. Çevre Sorunları Kongresi, 15-16 Mayıs 2008,
  2. İstanbul.
  3. Bayraktutan, Y., Özbilgin, M. (2013). Türkiye’de İller Düzeyinde Karayolu Yük Trafiği Dağılımının Analizi. 2. Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Aksaray, s: 708-715.
  4. Bayraktutan, Y., Özbilgin, M. (2014). Lojistik Merkez Kocaeli (Proje Raporu), Kocaeli: Baskı Dünyası. Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J., Cooper, B.M. (2002).
  5. Supply Chain Logistics Management, McGraw Hill, ABD. Coyle, J.J., Novack, R.A., Gibson, B.J., Bardi, E.J. (2011). Transportation: A Supply Chain Perspective, South-Western Cengage Learning, USA. EU (2013). EU Transport in Figures Statistical Pocketbook 2013, Belgium: Office of the European Union. Frazelle, E. (2002). Supply Chain Strategy: The Logistics of Supply Chain Management, McGraw-Hill, USA. Geunes, J., Taaffe, K. (2008). Transportation Systems Overview, in G. Don Taylor (ed) Introduction to Logistics Engineering, 10(1): 10-14.
  6. Lambert, D.M:, Stock, J.R., Ellram, L.M. (1998).
  7. Fundamentals of Logistics Management, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston. McKinnon, A. (2007) Road Transport Optimization, in Donald Waters (ed) Global logistics: New Directions in Supply Chain Management, Kogan Page, 273-289.
  8. Myers, J.H. Alpert, M.I. (1968). Determinant Buying Attributes: Meaning and Measurement, Marketing, 32(10): 13-20.
  9. Özbilgin, M. (2011). Lojistik Sektörünün İktisadi Analizi: Kocaeli Örneği, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Zonguldak. Rodrigue, J.P. (2006). Transportation and Globalization, in R. Robertson and J.A. Scholte (eds) Encyclopedia of Globalization, London: Routledge. Rodrigue, J.J., Slack, B., Comtois, C. (2006)
  10. The Geography of Transport Systems, New York: Routledge. Rota, Y. (2012).
  11. Demiryolu Ulaştırması, Şu kitapta Mustafa Cavcar (Ed) Turizm Ulaştırması, Eskişehir: Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayını, 52-78.
  12. Saaty, T.L. (1977). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15: 234-281.
  13. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G. (2006). Decision Makıing With The Analytic Network Process Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks, USA: Springer. Saban, M., Güğerçin, M. (2006). Deniz Taşımacılığı İşletmelerinde Maliyetleri Etkileyen Faktörler ve Sefer Maliyetleri. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Dergisi, 1(1): 1-16.
  14. Savy, M. (2013). Transport Management as a