SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

CYNICISM AND ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM TRENDS OF ACADEMICIANS AT SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES

SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİK PERSONELİNİN GENEL VE ÖRGÜTSEL SİNİZM DÜZEYİ

ELİF TÜRKAN ARSLAN
Pages
12–27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The data obtained in this field study is processed and the results are interpreted through the frequency, factor and correlation analyses

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the cynicism and organizational cynicism trends of academicians at the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Suleyman Demirel University.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, while the cynicism is analysed using the scale developed by Wrightman 1992 , for the organizational cynicism, Brandes’s 1997 scale is prefered.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The data obtained in this field study is processed and the results are interpreted through the frequency, factor and correlation analyses
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sinizm · Örgütsel Sinizm · Cynicism

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the cynicism and organizational cynicism trends of academicians at the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Suleyman Demirel University. For this purpose, while the cynicism is analysed using the scale developed by Wrightman 1992 , for the organizational cynicism, Brandes’s 1997 scale is prefered. The data obtained in this field study is processed and the results are interpreted through the frequency, factor and correlation analyses

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi’nde görev yapan akademisyenlerin genel sinizm ve örgütsel sinizm eğilimlerini tespit etmektir. Bu amaçla genel sinizm eğilimi Wrightman 1992 tarafından, örgütsel sinizm ise Brandes 1997 tarafından geliştirilen ölçekler kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Alan araştırması sonucunda elde edilen veriler frekans, faktör ve korelasyon analizinlerine tabi tutularak incelenmiş ve sonuçlar yorumlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, E. T. (2012). CYNICISM AND ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM TRENDS OF ACADEMICIANS AT SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 12–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/127708

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. ABRAHAM, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126 (3), 269-292. ss. ANDERSON, L.M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a Contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49 (11), 1395-1418. ss. ANDERSON, L.M., BATEMAN, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449-469. ss. ATWATER, L.E., WALDMAN, D.A., ATWATER, D., CARTIER, P. (2000). An upward feedback field experiment: Supervisors’ cynicism. reactions, and commitment to subordinates, Personel Psychology, 53, 275-297. ss. BATEMAN, T.S., SAKANO, T., FUJITA, M.(1992). Roger, me, and my attitude: Film propaganda and cynicism toward corporate leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (5), 768-771. ss. BERNERTH, J.B., ARMENAKIS, A.A., FEILD, H.S., WALKER, J. (September 2007). Justice, cynicism, and commitment: A study of important organizational change variables. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43 (3), 303-326. ss. BOMMER, W.H., RICH, G.A., RUBIN, R.S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 733-753. ss. BRANDES, P., DHARWADKAR, R., DEAN, J. W. (1999). Does organizational cynicism matter?: Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes. Paper presented at the Eastern Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA, 1999.
  2. BRANDES, P., CASTRO, S.L., JAMES, M.S.L., MARTINEZ, A.D., MATHERLY, T.A., FERRIS, G.R., HOCHWARTER, W.A. (February 2008). The interactive effects of job insecurity and organizational cynicism on work effort following a layoff. Journal of Leadership& Organizational Studies, 14 (3), 233-247. ss. BRANDES, P.M. (1997). Organizational cynicism: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Cincinnati Üniversitesi.
  3. BROWN, M., GREGAN, C. (Winter 2008). Cynicism: The role of employee involvement. Human Resource Management, 47 (49, 667-686. ss. COLE, M.S., BRUCH, H., VOGEL, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on EMPLOYEE cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 463-484. ss. DAVIS, W.D., GARDNER, W.L. (2004). Perception of politizs and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader-member exchange perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 439-465. ss. DEAN, J. W., BRANDES, P., DHARWAD