Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

TRADE BETWEEN POLLUTION-CREATING SECTORS AND ENVIRONMENT: A COMPARISON OF DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

KİRLİLİK YARATAN SEKTÖRLERİN TİCARETİ VE ÇEVRE: GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELER KARŞILAŞTIRMASI

Pages
212–226
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the meantime the study also finds out that as the sectors causing more pollution have an increasing share in exports in developing countries, the CO2 emissions do increase too

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It has-been a very well known fact that developing countries have had a higher share in creating environmental pollution since the Industrial Revolution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study indicates that according to the EKC, there exists an inverse U relationship between CO2 emissions and per capita income in the developed countries while the pattern of the relationship takes a U shape for the developing countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the meantime the study also finds out that as the sectors causing more pollution have an increasing share in exports in developing countries, the CO2 emissions do increase too
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kirlilik Sığınağı Hipotezi · Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi · Kirli Endüstriler

Abstract

It has-been a very well known fact that developing countries have had a higher share in creating environmental pollution since the Industrial Revolution. Besides this fact, in the aftermath of emergence of environmental protection necessities, developed countries have tended to carry their pollution creating industries to the developing world by means of foreign trade and investment. As a result of this, rapidly industrializing developing counties have had a more substantial share in the creation of pollution. This work analyzes both the Pollution Haven Hypothesis and Environmental Kuznets Curve EKC thesis at the same time. The study indicates that according to the EKC, there exists an inverse U relationship between CO2 emissions and per capita income in the developed countries while the pattern of the relationship takes a U shape for the developing countries. In the meantime the study also finds out that as the sectors causing more pollution have an increasing share in exports in developing countries, the CO2 emissions do increase too

Özet

Sanayi Devrimi’nden bu yana; gelişmiş ülkelerin küresel çevre kirliliğindeki payının yüksek olduğu bilinmektedir. Bununla birlikte; çevre koruma unsurlarının önemi ortaya çıktıktan sonra, gelişmiş ülkeler dış ticaret ve yatırım yoluyla kirli endüstrilerini gelişmekte olan ülkelere taşıma eğilimine girmişlerdir. Dolayısıyla; günümüzde hızla sanayileşen gelişmekte olan ülkelerin kirlilikteki payı önemli ölçüde artmaktadır. Bu çalışmada Kirlilik Sığınağı Hipotezi ve Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi ÇKE birlikte incelenmiştir. İnceleme sonucunda ÇKE’ye göre; kişi başına gelir ile CO2 emisyonu arasındaki ilişki gelişmiş ülkelerde ters-U; gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ise U şeklinde çıkmıştır. Ayrıca gelişmekte olan ülkelerde, kirlilik yaratan sektörlerin ihracattaki payı arttıkça CO2 salımının arttığı da bulgular arasındadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAR, S., YILMAZER, M., ARPAZLI, T. F. (2012). TRADE BETWEEN POLLUTION-CREATING SECTORS AND ENVIRONMENT: A COMPARISON OF DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 212–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/127703

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. BALTAGI, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 4th Edition,
  2. Chichester, England. BIRDSALL, N., WHEELER, D. (1993). Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: where are the pollution havens? Journal of Environment & Development 2(1), 137-147. ss. BÖLGESEL ÇEVRE MERKEZİ (REC) (2006). Birleşmiş Milletler iklim değişikliği çerçeve sözleşmesi ve Kyoto Protokolü metin ve bilgiler. Yunus Arıkan (yayına hazırlayan), Ankara.
  3. BREUSCH, T. S., PAGAN, A. R., (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review Of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, Vol. 47 (1), 239-253. ss. COLE, A.MATTHEW (2000). Air pollution and ‘dirty’ industries: how and why does the composition of manufacturing output change with economic development? Environmental and Resource Eraconomics 17, 109-123 ss. ÇEVRE VE ORMAN BAKANLIĞI (1998). Birleşmiş Milletler iklim değişikliği çerçeve sözleşmesi Kyoto Protokolü. Birleşmiş Milletler-Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı. DIETZ, S., ADGER, W.N. (2003). Economic growth, biodiversity loss and conservation effort. Journal of Environmental Management 68, 23–35. ss. EROĞLU, V. (2009), İklim Değişikliğinde Çözüme Ortak Türkiye. [Erişim adresi]:, [Erişim tarihi: 05.12.2009].
  4. ESKELAND, G.S., HARRISON, A.E. (1997). Moving to greener pastures: multinationals and pollution-havens. The World Bank Environment, Infrastructure and Agriculture Divisions: Policy Research Department, World Bank, Washington. GRETHER, J.M., de MELO, J. (2003). Gloablization and dirty industries: Do pollution havens matter? NBER Working Papers 9776, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. GROSSMAN, G., KRUEGER, A.B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North-American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper 3914. GROSSMAN, G., KRUEGER, A.B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, May: 353-377.
  5. GÜLOĞLU, B., İVRENDİ, M. (2008) Output fluctuations: transitory or permanent? the case of Latin America. Applied Economic Letters 17: 4, 381-386. ss. HARRIS, M.N.; MATYAS, L., KONYA, L. (2002),.Modelling the impact of environmental regulations on bilateral trade flows: OECD 1990-96. The World Economy, 25(3), 387- 405. ss. HETTIGE, H., LUCAS, R.E.B., WHEELER, D. (1992). The toxic intensity of industrial production: global patterns, trends and trade policy. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 82, 478-81. ss. HOFFMANN, R., LEE, C., RAMASAMY, B., YEUNG, M. (20