SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

IS FDI BENEFICIAL FOR DEVELOPMENT IN ANY CASE: AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN GREENFIELD AND BROWNFIELD INVESTMENTS

DYY KALKINMA İÇİN HER ŞARTTA YARARLI MIDIR: YEŞİLALAN VE KAHVERENGİALAN YATIRIMLARI ARASINDA AMPİRİK BİR KARŞILAŞTIRMA

Ayça HAYALİ SARİALİOĞLU
Pages
15–30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings also back the argument that brownfield can be beneficial for development in the long-run in relation with human capital development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In literature, the “quality” of FDI rather than its “quantity” was started to be focused on in order to be beneficial for economic development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the indicators of FDI’s “quality” is accepted as its “mode of entry”, greenfield or brownfield investments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings also back the argument that brownfield can be beneficial for development in the long-run in relation with human capital development.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:DYY · Kahverengialana Karşı Yeşilalan Yatırımları · Kalkınma

Abstract

In literature, the “quality” of FDI rather than its “quantity” was started to be focused on in order to be beneficial for economic development. One of the indicators of FDI’s “quality” is accepted as its “mode of entry”, greenfield or brownfield investments. The paper argues that greenfield investment is more useful for development in order to have its direct positive impact through investment. The paper empirically investigates this by a cross-section data analysis. The main findings support this argument. Findings also back the argument that brownfield can be beneficial for development in the long-run in relation with human capital development.

Özet

Literatürde, ekonomik kalkınmaya yararlı olması amacıyla DYY’nin “niceliği”nden çok “niteliği”ne odaklanılmaya başlanmıştır. DYY’nin niteliğinin bir göstergesi olarak DYY’nin “giriş şekli” yeşil alan ya da kahverengi alan yatırımları kabul edilmektedir. Çalışma, yatırım kanalıyla doğrudan olumlu etkisine sahip olmak amacıyla yeşilalan yatırımının kalkınma için daha yararlı olduğunu savunmaktadır. Çalışma bunu ampirik olarak bir yatay kesit veri analizi ile araştırmaktadır. Ana sonuçlar bu argümanı desteklemektedir. Aynı zamanda bulgular kahverengi alan yatırımının insan sermayesinin gelişimi ile ilişkili olarak uzun vadede kalkınma için yararlı olabildiği argümanını da desteklemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

SARİALİOĞLU, A. H. (2014). IS FDI BENEFICIAL FOR DEVELOPMENT IN ANY CASE: AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN GREENFIELD AND BROWNFIELD INVESTMENTS. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 15–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/127548

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AGOSIN, M.R., RICARDO, M. (2000). Foreign investment in developing countries: does it crowd in domestic investment. UNCTAD discussion paper 146. Geneva: UNCTAD. ADENIYI, O., OMISAKIN, O., EGWAIKHIDE, F., OYINLOLA, A. (2012). Foreign direct investment, economic growth and financial sector development in small open developing economies. Economic Analysis and Policy (EAP), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Economics and Finance, 42(1), pp.105-127.
  2. BALASUBRAMANYAM, V.N., SALISU, M., SAPSFORD, D. (1996). Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS countries. The Economic Journal, 106(434), pp.92-105.
  3. BARRO, R.J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 5, pp.181-189.
  4. BHAGWATI, J. N. (1978). Anatomy and consequences of exchange rate regimes. NBER Studies in International Economic Relations 10, New York: NBER. BORENSZTEIN, E., GREGORIO, J.D., LEE, J.-W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth. Journal of International Economics, 45, pp.115-135. CALDERÓN, C., LOAYZA, N., SERVÉN, L. (2002). Greenfield FDI vs. mergers and acquisitions: Does the distinction matter. Central Bank of Chile Working Papers 173, [Available at]:, [Accessed: 10.03.2012].
  5. CARKOVIC, M.V., LEVINE, R. (2005). Does foreign direct investment accelerate economic growth. T.H. MORAN, E.M. GRAHAM, M. BLOMSTRÖM (ed.) Does foreign direct investment promote development, Washington DC, USA: Institute for International Economics and Centre for Global Development, [Available at]:, [Accessed: 10.03.2012].
  6. CHUDNOVSKY, D., LOPEZ, A. (1999). Globalisation and developing countries: FDI and growth and SHD, [Available at]:, [Accessed: 10.03.2012].
  7. DUNNING, J. (1994). Re-evaluating the benefits of foreign direct investment. Transnational Corporations, 3(1), pp.23-52.
  8. DUNNING, J. (1997). A business analytic approach to governments and globalization. J.H. DUNNING (ed.) Governments, globalization and international business, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. EASTERLEY, W., LEVINE, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4), pp.1203-1250.
  10. FINDLAY, R. (1978). Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment and the transfer of technology, a simple dynamic model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92, pp.1-16.
  11. FREEMAN, C., HAGEDOORN, J. (1989). New technology and catching up. European Journal of Development Research, 1(1), pp.53-67.
  12. GLOBERMAN, S., SHAPIRO, D. (20