Journals / Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Formation, Crisis, and Dissolution of the Corporatist State in Mexico

Meksika’da Korporatist Devletin İnşası, Krizi ve Çözülüşü

Pages
129–149
Publication Date
2021-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this vein, the study emphasized that addressing the main structural conditions that transformed the Mexican corporatist socioeconomic form and identifying the contradictions created with its final dissolution are important to understand the impact of the sui generis social form on the contemporary crisis of neoliberalism in Mexico.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One can claim the possibility that the corporatist state structure was a concrete consequence of the Mexican Revolution (1910–1920) because it positioned Mexico differently in the Latin American region in terms of political stability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Mexican Revolution derived its legitimacy from the still vigilant 1917 Constitution, which represents the political character of the revolution and was institutionalized through an official state party.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this vein, the study emphasized that addressing the main structural conditions that transformed the Mexican corporatist socioeconomic form and identifying the contradictions created with its final dissolution are important to understand the impact of the sui generis social form on the contemporary crisis of neoliberalism in Mexico.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Meksika devrimi · korporatizm · pasif devrim

Abstract

One can claim the possibility that the corporatist state structure was a concrete consequence of the Mexican Revolution (1910–1920) because it positioned Mexico differently in the Latin American region in terms of political stability. The Mexican Revolution derived its legitimacy from the still vigilant 1917 Constitution, which represents the political character of the revolution and was institutionalized through an official state party. Moreover, it enabled 71 years of uninterrupted one-party rule that enjoyed ultimate dominance on state apparatus, forms of political participation, and economic structure. The study aims to evaluate the sui generis character of socioeconomic conditions, from which a new power bloc emerged in Mexico. Analysis was conducted on the institutionalization of the Mexican Revolution in the form of the Mexican corporatist state, consecutive crisis, and dissolution of the political structure in the 1980s. In this vein, the study emphasized that addressing the main structural conditions that transformed the Mexican corporatist socioeconomic form and identifying the contradictions created with its final dissolution are important to understand the impact of the sui generis social form on the contemporary crisis of neoliberalism in Mexico.

Özet

Meksika Devriminin (1910-1920) en somut ürünlerinden birinin, ülkeyi Latin Amerika ülkeleri arasında siyasi istikrar açısından farklı bir konuma yerleştirecek olan korporatist devlet yapısı olduğu söylenebilir. Devrimin politik karakterini yansıtan ve halen yürürlükte bulunan 1917 Anayasası ile meşru bir zemine oturan, resmi devlet partisi ile kurumsallaşan Meksika Devrimi, tek bir partinin aralıksız bir biçimde 71 yıl iktidarda kalarak devlet aygıtının, siyasi katılım biçimlerinin ve ekonomik yapının tamamına hâkim olmasını sağlamıştır. Bu çalışma, Meksika Devriminin kurumsallaşarak korporatist bir siyasi yapı oluşturmasını, bu yapının 1980’lerde girdiği krizi ve nihai olarak çözülmesini incelemektedir. Korporatist siyasi yapıların kendi tarihsel koşulları içerisinde değerlendirilmesi, bu yapıların neoliberal rejimin krize girdiği dönemlerde tekrar yükselip yükselmeyeceği tartışmalarına katkı sağlayacaktır. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, Meksika’da korporatist sosyoekonomik formun geçirdiği dönüşümün temel yapısal koşullarını anlamak, bu yapının karşılaştığı sorunlar ile nihai olarak çözülmesiyle ürettiği ve derinleştirdiği çelişkileri tanımlamak, neoliberal rejimin günümüzde girdiği bunalıma ne şekilde etki ettiğini tahlil etmek için önemli olduğu vurgusu yapılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EROL, E. (2021). Formation, Crisis, and Dissolution of the Corporatist State in Mexico. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 129–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/127436

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aidi, H. D. (2009).
  2. Redeploying the State, Corporatism, Neoliberalism, and Coalition Politics, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Arguedas, L. (1977). El movimiento de liberación nacional: Una experiencia de la izquierda mexicana en los sesentas. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 39(1), 229-249.
  3. Blacker-Hanson, O. (2012). The Intellectual Roots of Guerrero’s Cold War Rebellion. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research, 18(2), 101-117.
  4. Bortz, J. ve M. Aguila. (2006). Earning a Living: A History of Real Wage Studies in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 41(2), 112-138. Brachet-Márquez, V. (1996). El Pacto de Dominación: Estado, clase y reforma social en México (1910-1995), México: El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Sociológicos. Brambila, Aurora L. (1975). El marco socio-económico de la crisis política de 1958-1959 en México. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 37(2), 349-362.
  5. Cadena-Roa, J. (2003). State pacts, élites, and social movements in Mexico’s transition to democracy. States, Parties, and Social Movements, (Ed. J. A. Goldstone). Cambridge University Press. Calderón, J. M. (1972). Génesis del Presidencialismo en México, México: D.F.: El Caballito. Calva, J. L. (2004). La economìa mexicana en perspectiva. Economía UNAM, 63-85.
  6. Carr, B. (1986). The Mexican Economic Debacle and the Labor Movement: A New Era or More of the Same?. Modern Mexico: State, Economy and Social Conflict, Latin American Perspectives Reaaders Vol. 1, (Ed. Hamilton N. ve T. F. Harding), Sage Publications. Collier, R. B., ve Collier, D. (1979). Inducements versus constraints: disaggregating" Corporatism. The American Political Science Review, 967-986.
  7. Collier, R. B., ve Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America, University of Notre Dame Press.
  8. Davis, B. (2000). Las polícas de ajuste de los ejidatarios frente a la reforma neoliberal en México. Revista de CEPAL, 72, 99-119.
  9. Diaz-Cayeros, A. ve Magaloni, B. (2003). The politics of public spending – Part II. The Programa Nacional de Solidaridad (PRONASOL) in Mexico. Background Paper for the World Bank World Development Report 2004.
  10. Diaz-Cayeros, A., Estévez, F. ve Magaloni, B. (2016). The political Logic of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Delarbe, R. T. (1976). The Mexican Labour Movement. Latin American Perspectives, 3(1), 133-153.
  12. Dussel P. E. (1996). From E