Journals / Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Calibrating the Economic Impact of a Deficit in the Institutional Quality of Government: The Case of Spain

Pages
1–21
Publication Date
2021-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

How could we quantify, for any given country, the overall monetary cost of poor-quality institutions?

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The quality of government institutions and the absence of corruption are key factors of economic development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although Spain is among the top 20% of countries worldwide in terms of the quality of governance institutions, the value of the Spanish governance indicators is below what corresponds to Spain’s economic development level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:How could we quantify, for any given country, the overall monetary cost of poor-quality institutions?
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:corruption · quality of institutions · economic development

Abstract

The quality of government institutions and the absence of corruption are key factors of economic development. How could we quantify, for any given country, the overall monetary cost of poor-quality institutions? This paper compares the institutional quality in Spain with those of the rest of the world and assesses the economic cost of the deficit of institutional quality in the country. Although Spain is among the top 20% of countries worldwide in terms of the quality of governance institutions, the value of the Spanish governance indicators is below what corresponds to Spain’s economic development level. The authors calibrate the effect that a correction of the deficit of institutional quality would have on Spanish income under different parameter scenarios and always finds a high positive potential impact. The method we introduce to conduct these calibrations can serve as a useful blueprint for the analysis of other countries.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALCALÁ-AGULLÓ, F., JİMENEZ-SANCHEZ, F. (2021). Calibrating the Economic Impact of a Deficit in the Institutional Quality of Government: The Case of Spain. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 1–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/127430

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abed, G., & Davoodi, H. (2000).
  2. Corruption, Structural Reforms and Economic Performance in the Transition Economies. IMF Working Paper No.132, Washington, International Monetary Fund. Acharya, V. V., Cooley, T., Richardson, M., & Walter, I. (2011). Market Failures and Regulatory Failures: Lessons from Past and Present Financial Crises. Macroeconomics Working Papers 23273, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J.A. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.
  3. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. (2005a). The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth. The American Economic Review, 95(3), 546-579.
  4. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. (2005b). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth, Volume 1A, chapter 6, 385-472.
  5. Acemoglu, D., Gallego, F.A. & Robinson, J.A. (2014).
  6. Institutions, Human Capital, and Development. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 875–912. Alcalá, F. & Ciccone, A. (2004). Trade and Productivity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 613-646. Alcalá, F. & Jiménez, F. (2018). Los costes económicos del déficit de calidad institucional y la corrupción en España. Bilbao, Fundación BBVA (Colección Informes, Economía y Sociedad). Bobonis, G., Gertler, P., Gonzalez-Navarro, M. & Nichter, S. (2016). Vulnerability and Clientelism. University of Toronto, mimeo. Campos, N.F., Dimova, R.D. & Saleh, A. (2010). Whither Corruption? A Quantitative Survey of the Literature on Corruption and Growth. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5334. de Vaal, A. and Ebben, W. (2011). Institutions and the Relation between Corruption and Economic Growth. Review of Development Economics, 15, 108-123.
  7. Eichengreen, B., (1994). Institutions and Economic Growth: Europe After World War II, CEPR Discussion Papers 973, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). Do Institutions Cause Growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 271-303.
  8. Hall, R. E., & Jones, C.I. (1999). Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83-116. Jiménez, F. (2016). Los efectos de la corrupción sobre la desafección y el cambio político en España. In M. Villoria, J.M. Gimeno & J. Tejedor (eds.), La corrupción en España: ámbitos, causas y remedios jurídicos, Barcel