Journals / TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni / 2014 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

[Health Literacy and Measurment]

Sağlık Okuryazarlığı ve Ölçümü

Pages
327–334
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Power of information between patients and health care providers differ, despite the abundance of information difficult to draw accurate information, the reliability of this information ayırdınındaki attention on the issues of competence uncertainty SO, reveals a gap extremely important.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, health literacy (SFM) concept in the history of the definitions, scope, classification and theoretical models examined, the scales used in the assessment are described.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This is the practice of modern day living and health care services increases the individual roles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Power of information between patients and health care providers differ, despite the abundance of information difficult to draw accurate information, the reliability of this information ayırdınındaki attention on the issues of competence uncertainty SO, reveals a gap extremely important.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, health literacy (SFM) concept in the history of the definitions, scope, classification and theoretical models examined, the scales used in the assessment are described. Although various definitions and components SOY'un the written text to read, understand, and communicate the main points to use in decision-making information. Today, progress has been made in the treatment of many diseases, and is known to develop treatment facilities. Changing pattern of the components of health risk, however, new risks are emerging. Information in the medical world grows and changes rapidly. This is the practice of modern day living and health care services increases the individual roles. Power of information between patients and health care providers differ, despite the abundance of information difficult to draw accurate information, the reliability of this information ayırdınındaki attention on the issues of competence uncertainty SO, reveals a gap extremely important.

Özet

Bu çalışmada sağlık okuryazarlığı (SO) kavramının tarihçesi tanımları, kapsamı, modelleri ve sınıflandırılması kuramsal olarak incelenmiş, değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan ölçekler tanımlanmıştır. SO’nun farklı tanımları ve bileşenleri olmasına karşın kişinin yazılı bir metni okuyabilmesi, anlayabilmesi, karar verme sürecinde bilgisini kullanabilmesi ve iletişim kurabilmesi temel noktalardır. Günümüzde tedavi olanaklarının geliştiği ve birçok hastalığın tedavisinde ilerleme kaydedildiği bilinmektedir. Bununla birlikte sağlık örüntüsünde risk oluşturan unsurlar değişmekte, yeni riskler ortaya çıkmaktadır. Tıp dünyasında bilgiler hızla çoğalmakta ve değişmektedir. Bu durum günümüz yaşam ve sağlık hizmetleri pratiğinde bireysel rolleri daha da artırmaktadır. Hastalar ile sağlık personeli arasındaki bilgi gücündeki farklılık, bilginin çokluğuna rağmen doğru bilgiye ulaşmanın güçlüğü, bu bilginin güvenirliğinin ayırdınındaki yeterliliğin belirsizliği konuları üzerine dikkat çeken SO, son derece önemli bir boşluğu ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLANTEKİN, F., YUMRUTAŞ, M. (2014). [Health Literacy and Measurment]. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 327–334. https://ajindex.com/articles/127421

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Nutbeam, D. “The evolving concept of health literacy” Social Science & Medicine 67, 2008: 2072–2078, www.elsevier.com/locate/socscimed [E.T. 15.07.2011]. 2.Coulter, A., ve Ellins, J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating and involving patients. British Medical Journal 335
  2. 24–26. 3.Pignone, M., DeWalt, D., Sheridan, S., Berkman, N., ve Lohr, K.N. Interventions to improve health outcomes for patients with low literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 20
  3. Rootman I., Gordon-El-Bihbety, D. (2008). A Vision for a Health Literate Canada: Report of the Expert Panel on Health Literacy. 2008. Canadian Public Health Association www.cpha.ca/en/portals/hl/resources.aspx-31k [E.T.:02.08.2011] 5.Selden, C.R., Zorn, M., Ratzan, S., Parker, R.M. Helath Literacy
  4. Current Bibliographies ın Medicine
  5. National Enstitu of Health CBM. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000:1-33. 6.Baker, D.W. The meaning and measure of health literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21
  6. 878–883. 7.Nutbeam, D. “Health literacy as public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century” Health Promotion International, 15 (3), 2000. 8.American Medical Association (AMA). Health literacy: Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, Journal of the American Medical Association, 281(6)
  7. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ Developed By The Joint Committe On National Health Education Standarts (1998) “National Health Education Standarts
  8. Achieving health literacy” [E.T.:16.02.2011]. 10. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs171/ en/print.html., WHO,“Health Promotion: milestones on the road to a global alliance”, Fact sheet N171, Revised June 1998 [E.T.: 04.08.2011]. 11. Bohlman, L.N., Panzer, A.M., Kindig, D.A., (Eds) Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Committee on Health Literacy. Institute of Medicine of The National Academies. (IOM). Washington, D.C.
  9. The National Academies Press, 2004. www.nap.edu, [E.T.:04.08.2011]. 12. Zarcadoolas, C., Pleasant, A., ve Greer, D.S. “Understanding Health Literacy: An Expanded Model” Health Promotion International, Vol. 20 No. 2
  10. Kickbush, I., Wait, S. and Maag, D. “From Navigating Health
  11. The Role of Health”,2005, http://www.ilonakickbusch.com/healthliteracy/NavigatingHealth.pdf [E.T.:16.02.2011] 14. Rudd, R. Objective 11-2: “I