SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4

Effects of Different Sowing Design on Forage Yield and Yield Component of Sorgum and Soybeen Mixtures

Farklı Sıralara Ekilen Sorgum ve Soya Bitkisinde Ekim Oranlarının Bazı Bitkisel Özelliklere Yem Verime ve Kalitesine Etkileri

Serap Kızılaydemir
Mustafa Kızılşimşek
Kutalmış Turhal
Pages
265–270
Publication Date
2017-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, 33% soybean rate in mixed crop produced high total CP yield as much as sole sorghum promising an expectation in enhancing animal performance due to slight decreases in NDF and ADF contents compared to pure sorghum.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was conducted to determine the effects of different mixed cropping patterns sorghum with soybean on agronomic characters and forage yield in Bilecik, Turkey, 2015 growing season.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the study, sorghum was clearly determined as dominant crop for producing high yield.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, 33% soybean rate in mixed crop produced high total CP yield as much as sole sorghum promising an expectation in enhancing animal performance due to slight decreases in NDF and ADF contents compared to pure sorghum.
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Birlikte ekim · kalite · sorgum

Abstract

This research was conducted to determine the effects of different mixed cropping patterns sorghum with soybean on agronomic characters and forage yield in Bilecik, Turkey, 2015 growing season. Three mixed cropping patterns in alternate rows and pure stands for individual crops were designed field trials were arranged in complete randomized blocks with three replications. As a result of the study, sorghum was clearly determined as dominant crop for producing high yield. Therefore decreasing sorghum plant density in mixture reduced the total yield. But, soybean presence in forage improved the protein content of forage. Moreover, 33% soybean rate in mixed crop produced high total CP yield as much as sole sorghum promising an expectation in enhancing animal performance due to slight decreases in NDF and ADF contents compared to pure sorghum.

Özet

Bu araştırma, Bilecik’te 2015 yetiştirme mevsiminde, sorgumun soya fasulyesi ile birlikte ekim sisteminde

🔖

Cite This Article

Kızılaydemir, S., Kızılşimşek, M., Turhal, K. (2017). Effects of Different Sowing Design on Forage Yield and Yield Component of Sorgum and Soybeen Mixtures. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 265–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/1272960

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Ahmad A, Ahmad R, Mahmod N, Tanver A, 2007. Performance of forage sorghum intercropped with forage legumes under different planting patterns. Pak. J. Bot, 39:431–439.
  2. Akhtar MF, Ahmad A, Ibni Zamir M S, Khalid F, Mohsin A U, Azfal M, 2013. Agro-qualitative studies on forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) sown alone and in mixture with forage legumes. Pakistan J. Sci, 65 (2): 179-185.
  3. Anonymous 2005. The Ankom 200 Fiber Analyzer, Procedures for NDF, ADF and ADL analyses. ANKOM, Fairport, NY. hhtp:// www. ankom.com (Erişim tarihi: 10 Ekim, 2016).
  4. AOAC (1990). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA.
  5. Aydin G, Grant R J, O’Rear J, 1999. Brown midrib sorghum in diets for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci, 82: 2127–2135.
  6. Bean B W, Baumhardt R L, McCollum FT, McCuistion KC, 2013. Comparison of sorghum classes for grain and forage yield and forage nutritive value. Field Crops Research, 142: 20-26.
  7. Ibrahim M, Ayub M, Maqbool MM, Nadeem SM, Haq T, Hussein S, Ali A, Lauriault L M, 2014. Forage yield components of irrigated maize-legume mixtures at varied seed ratios. Field Crops Research, 169: 140-144.
  8. Ibrar R, Shahbaz A, Malik MA, 2002. Sunflower-summer legumes intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. Yield and yield components. Pak. J. Agric. Res., 17: 231-236.
  9. Kavut YT, Geren H, Soya H, Avcıoğlu R, Kır B, 2014. Karışım oranı ve hasat zamanlarının bazı yıllık baklagil yembitkileri ile İtalyan Çimi karışımlarının kışlık ara ürün performansına etkileri. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Dergisi, 51 (3):279-288.
  10. Khot RB, Desale JS, Pisal, AA, Patil, SK, 1992. Assessment of forage production potential of maize (Zea mays) with forage legumes in various planting systems. Ind. J. Agron 37: 343–345.
  11. Kızılşimşek M, Erol A, 2000. Yem bitkilerini karışım olarak yetiştirmelerde alan eşdeğerlik oranı, türler arası rekabet ve besin sağlama indeksi. KSÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 3(1):14-22.
  12. Mead R, Willey R.W, 1980: The concept of land equivalent ratios and advantages in yields from intercropping. Exp. Agric.16: 117—122.
  13. Moradi HM, Noori A, Sobhkhizi M, Fahramand, Rigi K, 2014. Effect of intercropping in agronomy. J. Nov. Appl. Sci., 3:315-320.
  14. Oliver AL, Grant RJ, Pedersen JF, O’Rear J, 2004. Comparison of brown midrib-6 and -18 forage sorghum with conventional sorghum and corn silage in diets of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 637–644.
  15. Prasad RB, Brook RM, 2005. Effect of varying maize densities on intercropped maize and soybean in Nepal. Exp. Agric., 41: 365–382.
  16. Tansı V, 1987. Çukurova bölgesinde mısır ve soyanın ikinci ürün olarak değişik ekim sistemlerinde birlikte yetiştirilmesinin tane ve hasıl yem verimine etkisi üzerinde araştırmalar. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
  17. Telleng M, Wiryawan KG, Karti PDMH, Permana IG, Abdullah L, 2014. Forage production and nutrient composition of different sorghum varieties cultivated with indigofera in intercropping system. Media Peternakan, 39(3): 203-209.
  18. AOAC (1990). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA.