SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4

Gasification of Kenaf Hydrolysate and Optimization by Response Surface Methodology

Kenaf Hidrolizatının Gazlaştırılması ve Cevap Yüzey Yöntemi ile Optimizasyonu

Arif Hasanoğlu
Bahar Meryemoğlu
Pages
131–139
Publication Date
2017-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that temperature was main factor on hydrogen-rich gas production while other parameters (biomass feed concentration, feed flow rate) were secondary.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effect of temperature, feed flow rate and biomass feed concentration parameters on gasification performance of kenaf biomass hydrolysate using continuous atmospheric catalytic vapour phase (AVPR) reforming system was examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results showed that temperature was main factor on hydrogen-rich gas production while other parameters (biomass feed concentration, feed flow rate) were secondary.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the optimazition, it was observed that the temperature should be above 295 °C, and the flow rate of 0.30 mL / min for high yield hydrogen.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cevap yüzey metodu · gazlaştırma · hidrojen

Abstract

In this study, the effect of temperature, feed flow rate and biomass feed concentration parameters on gasification performance of kenaf biomass hydrolysate using continuous atmospheric catalytic vapour phase (AVPR) reforming system was examined. The effect of experimental parameters on the composition of gas products were investigated using the RSM (Response Surface Methodology) method. One of the greatest advantages of this method that makes it possible to study the effect of gasification efficiency on several experimental parameters by carrying out a few experimental studies. The results showed that temperature was main factor on hydrogen-rich gas production while other parameters (biomass feed concentration, feed flow rate) were secondary. As a result of the optimazition, it was observed that the temperature should be above 295 °C, and the flow rate of 0.30 mL / min for high yield hydrogen.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, kenaf hidrolizatının kesintisiz olarak atmosferik basınçta katalitik olarak buhar faz

🔖

Cite This Article

Hasanoğlu, A., Meryemoğlu, B. (2017). Gasification of Kenaf Hydrolysate and Optimization by Response Surface Methodology. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 131–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/1272958

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Değirmen G, Pütün AE, Kılıç M, Pütün E, 2012. Nohut samanı hızlı pirolizinin deney tasarımı ile modellenmesi. Onuncu Ulusal Kimya Mühendisliği Kongresi, 3-6 Eylül 2012, İstanbul.
  2. Gursahani KI, Alcala R, Cortright RD, Dumesic JA, 2001. Reaction kinetics measurements and analysis of reaction pathways for conversions of acetic acid, ethanol and ethyl acetate over silica-supported Pt. Applied Catalysis A: General, 222: 369-392.
  3. Hasanoğlu A, Meryemoglu B, Kurtulus M, Irmak S, Erbatur O, 2016. A new approach for high-yield hydrogen production: Atmospheric pressure vapour-phase catalytic reforming of biomass hydrolysate. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41: 12880-12887.
  4. Huber GW, Shabaker JW, Evans ST, Dumesic JA, 2006. Aqueous-phase reforming of ethylene glycol over supported Pt and Pd bimetallic catalysts. Applied Catalysis B, 62: 226-235.
  5. Kumar S, Singh RK, 2013. Optimization of process parameters by response surface methodology (RSM) for catalytic pyrolysis of waste high-density polyethylene to liquid fuel. Journal of Enviromental Chemical Engineering, 2: 115-122.
  6. Meryemoglu B, Hasanoğlu A, Kaya B, Irmak S, Erbatur O, 2014. Hydrogen production from aqueous-phase reforming of sorghum biomass: An application of the response surface methodology. Renewable Energy, 62: 535-541.
  7. Meryemoğlu B, Hesenov A, Irmak S, Atanur OM, Erbatur O, 2010. Aqueous phase reforming of biomass using various types of supported precious metal and raney nickel catalysts for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35: 12580-12587.
  8. Rioche C, Kulkarni S, Meunier FC, Breen JP, Burch R, 2005. Steam reforming of model compounds and fast pyrolysis bio-oil on supported noble metal catalysts. Applied Catalysis B, 61: 130-139.
  9. Williams PT, Onwudili J, 2005. Composition of products from the supercritical water gasification of glucose: a model biomass compound. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 44(23): 8739–49.