SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

The Effects of Different Irrigation Water Salinity Levels on Some Silage Sorghum (Sorghum sp.) Varieties

Farklı Sulama Suyu Tuzluluk Seviyelerinin Bazı Silajlık Sorgum (Sorgum sp.) Çeşitleri Üzerine Etkileri

İbrahim Aras0000-0001-7078-7097
Bilal Keskin0000-0001-6826-9768
Pages
279–288
Publication Date
2018-03-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most resistant varieties of sorghum to the highest saline application were Early Sumac, Rox and Nutri Honey, respectively and the most sensitive varieties were Leoti, Gözde-80 and Hayday, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research was established with 4 replications according to the factorial experiment design in the research areas of the Agricultural Research and Application Center of Igdir University in 2015 year.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was set up to determine the effects of plant height, plant fresh weight, plant dry rate, plant dry weight, salt tolerance percentage, leaf ratio, stem ratio and bunch rate of sorghum of 7 different irrigation water salinity (0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 dS m-1) on 3 sorghum (Rox, Early Sumac, Leoti) 2 sorghum-sudangrass hybrids (Nutri Honey, Hayday) and 1 Sudangrass (Gözde-80) grown in pots in greenhouses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most resistant varieties of sorghum to the highest saline application were Early Sumac, Rox and Nutri Honey, respectively and the most sensitive varieties were Leoti, Gözde-80 and Hayday, respectively.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sorgum · tuzlu su · verim

Abstract

The research was established with 4 replications according to the factorial experiment design in the research areas of the Agricultural Research and Application Center of Igdir University in 2015 year. The study was set up to determine the effects of plant height, plant fresh weight, plant dry rate, plant dry weight, salt tolerance percentage, leaf ratio, stem ratio and bunch rate of sorghum of 7 different irrigation water salinity (0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 dS m-1) on 3 sorghum (Rox, Early Sumac, Leoti) 2 sorghum-sudangrass hybrids (Nutri Honey, Hayday) and 1 Sudangrass (Gözde-80) grown in pots in greenhouses. As the irrigation water salinity increased, the plant height, plant fresh weight, plant dry weight, salt tolerance percentage and bunch rate decreased, plant dry ratio, leaf ratio and stem ratio increased. The most resistant varieties of sorghum to the highest saline application were Early Sumac, Rox and Nutri Honey, respectively and the most sensitive varieties were Leoti, Gözde-80 and Hayday, respectively.

Özet

Araştırma 2015 yılında Iğdır Üniversitesi Tarımsal Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi denem alanlarında

🔖

Cite This Article

Aras, İ., Keskin, B. (2018). The Effects of Different Irrigation Water Salinity Levels on Some Silage Sorghum (Sorghum sp.) Varieties. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 279–288. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.407886

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Abid M, Hassan A, Ghafoor A, Javed K, 2003. Brackish Water for İrrigation: I. Effects on Yield of Wheat and Sorghum in Wheat-Sorghum Crop Rotation and Properties of The Rasulpur Soil Series. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 5(3): 367-376.
  2. Akdeniz H, Yılmaz İ, Keskin B, Arvas Ö, 2002. The Effects of Different Nitrogen Levels on Yield and Yield Compenents of Some Silage Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare L.) Varieties Grown Under Irrigated Conditions in Van Turkey. Turk J. of Field Crops, 7: 52-60.
  3. Alsabbagh MHA, Türkmen Ö, Seymen M, 2016. Citrillus lanatus var. lanatus ve Citrillus lanatus var. citroides kaynaklı bazı karpuz genotiplerinin tuza tolerans düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(1):24-38.
  4. Ashraf M, 1994. Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 13(1): 17-42.
  5. Atış İ, 2011. Bazı Silajlık Sorgum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Çeşitlerinin Çimlenmesi ve Fide Gelişimi Üzerine Tuz Stresinin Etkileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2): 58-67.
  6. Baytekin H, Gül İ, Bengisu G, 1995. Harran ovası sulu şartlarında ikinci ürün olarak yetiştirilen silaj sorgumda farklı azot dozlarının verim ve bazı tarımsal karakterlere etkisi. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(3): 212-216.
  7. Beltran JM, Manzur CL, 2005. Overview of salinityproblems in the world and FAO strategies to address the problem. Proceedings of the international salinity forum, 311–313s, April 2005, Riverside, California.
  8. Berenguer MJ, Faci JM, 2001. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Yield Compensation Processes Under Different Plant Densities and Variable Water Supply. European Journal of Agronomy, 15(1): 43-55.
  9. Çarpıcı EB, Çelik N, Bayram G, 2009. Effects of Salt Stress on Germination of Some Maize (Zea mays L.) Cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(19): 4918-4922.
  10. Epstein E, 1985. Salt-Tolerante Crops: Origins, Development, and Prospects of The Concept. Plant and Soil, 89(1/3): 187-198.
  11. Francois LE, Donovan T, Maas EV, 1984. Salinity effects on Seed Yield, Growth, and Germination of Grain Sorghum. Agronomy Journal, 76:741-744.
  12. Fribourg HA, Duck BN, Culvahouse EM, 1976. Forage Sorghum Yield Components and Their in vivo Digestibility. Agronomy Journal, 68(2): 361-365.
  13. Gül İ, Başbağ M, 1999. Diyarbakır sulu koşullarında ikinci ürün olarak yetiştirilen Silaj sorgum, Sorgum-Sudan otu Melezi, Sudan otu Çeşitlerinde Verim ve Verim Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. Türkiye 3. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi. Cilt:3, 306-311, Çayır-Mer’a Yem Bitkileri ve Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller, Adana.
  14. Güngör Y, Erözel Z, 1994. Drenaj ve Arazi Islahı. Ders Kitabı. Ankara Ün. Ziraat Fak. Yayınları, yayın no:1341, Ders Kitabı:389, Ankara.
  15. İptaş S, 1993. Tokat Yöresinde Sorgum ve Sorgum x Sudan Otu Melezi Çeşitlerinde Yararlanma İmkanları. Tarla Bitkileri Çayır-Mer’a ve Yem bitkileri Kongresi. 341-351s, 21-22 Eylül 1993, İzmir.
  16. Keskin B, Yılmaz İH, Akdeniz H, 2005a. Sorgum x Sudan Otu Melezi (Sorghum bicolor x Sorghum sudanense Mtapf.) Çeşitlerinde Hasat Zamanının Verim ve Verim Unsurlarına Etkisi. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Dergisi, 36(2): 145-150.
  17. Keskin B, Yılmaz İH, Karslı MA, Nursoy H, 2005b. Effects of Urea or Urea Plus Molasses Supplementation to Silages with Different Sorghum Varieties Harvested at the Milk Stage on the Quality and In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility of Silages. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 29:1143-1147.
  18. Khalili A, Akbari N, Chaichi MR, 2008. Limited Irrigation and Phosphorus Fertilizer Effects on Yield and Yield Components of Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. var. kimia). American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ. Sci., 3(5): 697-702.
  19. Kökten K, Karaköy T, Bakoğlu A, Akçura M, 2010. Determination of Salinity Tolerance of Some Lentil (Lens culinaris M.) Varieties. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 8(1): 140- 143.
  20. Maas EV, Poss JA, Hoffman GJ, 1986. Salinity Sensitivity of Sorghum at Three Growth Stages. Irrigation Science, 7(1): 1-11.
  21. Mensah JK, Akomeah PA, Ikhajiagbe B, Ekpekurede EO, 2006. Effects of salinity on germination, growth and yield of five groundnut genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5(20): 1973-1979.
  22. Nawaz K, Talat A, Iqra, Hussain K, Majeed A, 2010. Induction of Salt Tolerance in Two Cultivars of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) by Exogenous Application of Proline at Seedling Stage. World Applied Sciences Journal, 10(1): 93-99.
  23. Parlak M, Parlak AÖ, 2005. Sulama Suyu Tuzluluk Düzeylerinin Silajlık Sorgumun (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Verimine ve Toprak Tuzluluğuna Etkisi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 12 (1): 8-13.
  24. Pholsen S, Kasikranan S, Pholsen P, Suksri A, 1998. Dry Matter Yield, Chemical Components and Dry Matter Degradability of Ten Sorghum Cultivars (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Grown on Oxic Paleustult Soil. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 1(3): 228-231.
  25. Poonia SR, Pal R, 1979. The effect of organic manuring and water quality on water transmission parameters and sodication of a sandy loam soil. Agricultural Water Management, 2(2):163-175.
  26. Rivelli AR, Lovelli S, Nardiello I, Perniola M, Gherbin P, 2002. Growth and Yield Response of Paper Sorghum to Irrigation With Saline Water (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench x Sorghum dochna var. technicum–Basilicata). Rivista di Agronomia, 36(4): 333-338.
  27. Sağlamtimur T, Tansı V, Baytekin H, 1998. Yem Bitkileri Yetiştirme. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı No: 74. Adana.
  28. Shannon MC, 1978. Testing Salt Tolerance Variability Among Tall Wheatgrass Lines. Agronomy Journal, 70(5): 719-722.
  29. Skerman PJ, Riveros F, 1990. Tropical Grasses. FAO Plant Production and Protection Series No:23, pp 695-697, Rome
  30. Temel S, Keskin B, Şimşek U, Yılmaz İH, 2015. Performance of Some Forage Grass Species in Halomorphic Soil. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 20(2): 131-141.
  31. Yurtseven E, Çaycı G, Sevimay CS, Öztürk A, Parlak M, Yalçın L, 2002. Tuzluluk ve Su Miktarlarının Macar Fiği (Vicia pannonica Crantz) Verimi ve Toprak Tuzluluğuna Etkisi: I. Yıkama Uygulanmayan Koşul. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1): 1-6.