SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

The Effect of Different Sowing Rates on Some Agronomic and Yield Characteristics of Corn-Soybean Together Production

Farklı Ekim Oranlarının Mısır-Soyanın Birlikte Üretiminin Bazı Agronomik ve Verim Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi

Serap Kizil Aydemir0000-0003-0291-8598
Pages
305–311
Publication Date
2018-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bilecik conditions were also favorable for Corn+ 70% soybean cultivation rates in order to obtain good quality forage and to increase the field use intensity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the plant characteristics and forage yields of corn and soybeans grown together at simple and different sowing rates in Bilecik conditions and to increase the forage yield and quality by determining the contribution share of soybean without decreasing the sowing norm of corn.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 2015, the experiment was carried out with three replications according to the randomized blocks trial design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bilecik conditions were also favorable for Corn+ 70% soybean cultivation rates in order to obtain good quality forage and to increase the field use intensity.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Alan eşdeğer oranı · ekim oranı · mısır

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the plant characteristics and forage yields of corn and soybeans grown together at simple and different sowing rates in Bilecik conditions and to increase the forage yield and quality by determining the contribution share of soybean without decreasing the sowing norm of corn. In 2015, the experiment was carried out with three replications according to the randomized blocks trial design. The dominant plant corn was planted to be 15 cm over 70 rows between rows and added with 30%, 50% and 70% soybean on the row, soybean is grown together. In this study, the highest plant height, leaf and stem ratio, crude protein ratio, crude protein yield and total dry matter yield were obtained from Corn + 70% soybean cultivation in order to increase forage efficiency and quality. Besides, statistically, the highest green and dry matter yields were obtained from Corn + 70% soybean sowing rate. However, since the level of digestion is very slow and low, the ratio of ADF and NDF required to be in low amounts in the region is found to be lowest in Corn + 70% soybean sowing rate. At the end of the study, the highest total dry matter yield, the total crude protein yield, the dry matter yield rate and the crude protein yield equivalent yield ratio were determined as Corn + 70% soybean seed rate. Bilecik conditions were also favorable for Corn+ 70% soybean cultivation rates in order to obtain good quality forage and to increase the field use intensity.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Bilecik koşullarında yalın ve farklı ekim oranlarında kullanılan soyanın ve mısırın

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydemir, S. K. (2018). The Effect of Different Sowing Rates on Some Agronomic and Yield Characteristics of Corn-Soybean Together Production. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 305–311. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458663

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Akman Z, (1993). Modern Tarımda Karışık Ekimin (Intercropping) Rol. (Horwith, 1983 ‘den çeviri) Hasat Dergisi, Ekim, Sayı 101, 39-43.
  2. Akman Z ve Sencar Ö, (1991). Şeker Mısırında (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) Ekim Sıklığı ve Ekim Zamanının Verim ve Diğer Agronomik Karakterler üzerine Etkileri. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Tokat Ziraat Fak. Dergisi, Cilt 7:(1), 25-36.
  3. Akyıldız R, (1984). Yemler Bilgisi Laboratuar Kılavuzu, 213. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları. 895, Ankara.
  4. Allen JR and Obura RK, (1983). Yield of Corn, Cowpea and Soybean under Different Intercropping Systems. Agronomy Journal, 75(6); 1005-1009.
  5. Ayaşan T, (2011). Soya silajı ve hayvan beslemede kullanımı. Erciyes Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 18(3): 193-200.
  6. Bryan WB and Materu MB, (1987). Intercropping Maize with Climbing Beans, Cowpeas and Velvet Beans. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 159(4); 245-250.
  7. Enyi BAC, (1973). Effects of Intercropping Maize or Sorghum with Cowpeas, Pigeonpeas or Beans. Expl. Agric., 9:83-90.
  8. Erdoğdu İ, Altınok S ve Genç A, (2013). Farklı sıralara ekilen mısır ve soya bitkisinde ekim oranlarının bazı bitkisel özellikler ve yem verimine etkileri. Biyoloji Bil. Araştırma Dergisi, ISSN: 1308-3961, 6(1): 6-10, Ankara.
  9. Francis CA, (1985). Intercropping-Competititon and Yield Advantage. Cropping Systems, Rodale Research Center, Box 323, RD1, Kutziown, PA 19530.
  10. Hirpa T, (2013). Effect of interceding date on growth and yield of three legume crops intercropped with maize (Zea mays). Journal of Biological and Chemical Research, ISSN0970-4973 Ms30/2/84/2013, ISSN2319-3077 (Online Electronic), 30(2): 652-673, Ethiopia, http://www.jbcr.in, Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2015.
  11. Kavut YT, Geren H, Soya H, Avcıoğlu R ve Kır B, (2014). Karışım Oranı ve Hasat Zamanlarının Bazı Yıllık Baklagil Yembitkileri ile İtalyan Çimi Karışımlarının Kışlık Ara Ürün Performansına Etkileri. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg. 51 (3):279-288.
  12. Kılıç A, (2010). Silo Yemi Öğretimi (Öğretim, Öğrenim ve Uygulama Önerileri), Hasat Yayıncılık, 264 s.
  13. Pekşen E ve Gülümser A, (1995). Karışık Ekimin Karadeniz Bölgesi Tarımındaki Önemi ve Bazı Yemeklik Baklagil ve Buğdaygil Bitkilerinin Karışık Ekimde Kullanılabilme İmkânları. Karadeniz Bölgesi Tarımının Geliştirilmesinde Yeni Teknikler Kongresi, 307-315, 10-11 Ocak, Samsun.
  14. Rao MR and Willey R W, (1983). Effects of Pigeonpea Plant Populations and Row Arrangement in Sorghum / Pigeonpea Intercropping. Field Crops Res., 7:203-12.
  15. Sencar Ö, Gökmen S, Yıldırım A, Kandemir N, (1994). Tarla Bitkileri Üretimi. G.O.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları:3, Ders Kitabı:3: s.16-17, Tokat.
  16. Tansı V, (1987). Çukurova Bölgesinde Mısır ve Soyanın Ikinci Ürün Olarak Değişik Ekim Sistemlerinde Birlikte Yetiştirilmesinin Tane ve Hasıl Verimine Etkisi Üzerinde Araştırmalar. Çukurova Üniv. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Adana.
  17. Van Soest PJ, (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant (2nd Ed.). p. 528. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, N.Y.