Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

On Simplicial Leibniz Algebras

Simplisel Leibniz Cebirler Üzerine

Ali Aytekin(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7892-6960
Pages
1224–1232
Publication Date
2020-06-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Aim of this paper is to define simplicial object in category of Leibniz algebras and to show the equivalence between the category of simplicial Leibniz algebras and the category of crossed modules over Leibniz algebras.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of this paper is to define simplicial object in category of Leibniz algebras and to show the equivalence between the category of simplicial Leibniz algebras and the category of crossed modules over Leibniz algebras.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aim of this paper is to define simplicial object in category of Leibniz algebras and to show the equivalence between the category of simplicial Leibniz algebras and the category of crossed modules over Leibniz algebras.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Aim of this paper is to define simplicial object in category of Leibniz algebras and to show the equivalence between the category of simplicial Leibniz algebras and the category of crossed modules over Leibniz algebras.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Leibniz cebir · simplisel obje · çaprazlanmış modül

Abstract

Aim of this paper is to define simplicial object in category of Leibniz algebras and to show the equivalence between the category of simplicial Leibniz algebras and the category of crossed modules over Leibniz algebras.

Özet

Bu makalenin temel amacı, Leibniz cebirler kategorisinde simplisel objeyi tanımlayarak, simplisel Leibniz cebirler kategorisi ile Leibniz cebirler üzerinde çaprazlanmış modüller kategorisinin denkliğini göstermektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aytekin, A. (2020). On Simplicial Leibniz Algebras. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 1224–1232. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.657475

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Atik M, Aytekin A, Uslu EÖ, 2017. Representability of actions in the category of (Pre)crossed modules in Leibniz algebras. Communications in Algebra, 45(5): 1825–1841.
  2. Aytekin A, Casas JM, Uslu EÖ, 2012. Semi-Complete Crossed Modules of Lie Algebras. Journal of Algebra and Its Applications, 11(5): 1–24.
  3. Bloh A, 1965. A generalization of the concept of a Lie algebra. Doklady Akademii Lauk, 165 (3): 471–473.
  4. Casas JM, 1999. Crossed extensions of Leibniz algebras. Communations in Mathematics, 27 (12): 6253–6272.
  5. Casas JM, Fernandez-Casado R, Garcia-Martinez, X, Khmaladze E, 2018. Actor of a Crossed Module of Leibniz Algebras. Theory and Applications of Categories, 33(2): 23–42.
  6. Casas JM, Khmaladze E, Ladra M, 2008. Crossed modules for Leibniz n-algebras. Forum Mathematicum, 20: 841–858.
  7. D.M. Kan, 1958. A Combinatorial Definition of Homotopy Groups. Annals of Mathematics, 67(2): 288–312.
  8. Ellis GJ, 1993. Homotopical aspects of Lie algebras. Journal of The Australian Mathematical Society, 54(3): 393–419.
  9. Emir K, Akay HG, Pullback crossed modules in the category of racks. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 48(1): 140–149.
  10. Loday JL, 1993. Une version non commutative des algebres de Lie: les algebres de Leibniz. L’Enseignement Mathhematique, 39: 269–293.
  11. Loday JL, Pirashvili T, 1993. Universal enveloping algebras of Leibniz algebras and (co)homology. Mathematische Annalen, 296(1): 139–158.
  12. Şahan T, 2019. Further remarks on liftings of crossed modules. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 48(3): 743–752.
  13. Şahan T, Erciyes A, 2019. Actions of internal groupoids in the category of Leibniz Algebra. Communications Series A1:Mathematics and Statistics, 68(1): 619–632.
  14. Whitehead JHC, 1949. Combinatorial Homotopy. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 55: 453–496.