SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Some General Comments on The Results For Sheep Breeding Researches at Atatürk University Farm

Yusuf Vanlı(TEKIRDAG NAMIK KEMAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0001-9874
Ali Kaygısız(KSÜ Ziraat Fakültesi)0000-0002-5302-2735
Pages
508–517
Publication Date
2024-03-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It contains; (i) General aspects of sheep population in Türkiye for both pure and crossbred genotypes relating to domestic and improved sheep breeds were summarized, (ii) The aims of research projects which were undertaken in Ataturk University farm were outlined, (iii) The effects of environmental factors such as year, age of ewe, breeding systems, birth status and sex relating productive and reproductive traits depended on data collected from Merino, Morkaraman and their crossbred sheep flocks were analyzed, (iv) Genetic parameters as heritability, repeatability and correlation estimates for the characteristics studied have been calculated from data adjusted for the effects of statistically significant environmental factors, (v) It was concluded that it can be possible to developed a more productive type of sheep for the establishment of a new Morkaraman flock in the area, by mating inter se of the members of a combination of the genotypic groups and applying a selection program for the criterions aimed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article puts forward to brief comparative results of three unpressed doctorate thesis relating to the investigation on Merino, Morkaraman and their crosses which were maintained in Ataturk University farm, Erzurum.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article puts forward to brief comparative results of three unpressed doctorate thesis relating to the investigation on Merino, Morkaraman and their crosses which were maintained in Ataturk University farm, Erzurum.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It contains; (i) General aspects of sheep population in Türkiye for both pure and crossbred genotypes relating to domestic and improved sheep breeds were summarized, (ii) The aims of research projects which were undertaken in Ataturk University farm were outlined, (iii) The effects of environmental factors such as year, age of ewe, breeding systems, birth status and sex relating productive and reproductive traits depended on data collected from Merino, Morkaraman and their crossbred sheep flocks were analyzed, (iv) Genetic parameters as heritability, repeatability and correlation estimates for the characteristics studied have been calculated from data adjusted for the effects of statistically significant environmental factors, (v) It was concluded that it can be possible to developed a more productive type of sheep for the establishment of a new Morkaraman flock in the area, by mating inter se of the members of a combination of the genotypic groups and applying a selection program for the criterions aimed.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Live body weight · Milk yield · Fleece traits reproductive traits

Abstract

This article puts forward to brief comparative results of three unpressed doctorate thesis relating to the investigation on Merino, Morkaraman and their crosses which were maintained in Ataturk University farm, Erzurum. It contains; (i) General aspects of sheep population in Türkiye for both pure and crossbred genotypes relating to domestic and improved sheep breeds were summarized, (ii) The aims of research projects which were undertaken in Ataturk University farm were outlined, (iii) The effects of environmental factors such as year, age of ewe, breeding systems, birth status and sex relating productive and reproductive traits depended on data collected from Merino, Morkaraman and their crossbred sheep flocks were analyzed, (iv) Genetic parameters as heritability, repeatability and correlation estimates for the characteristics studied have been calculated from data adjusted for the effects of statistically significant environmental factors, (v) It was concluded that it can be possible to developed a more productive type of sheep for the establishment of a new Morkaraman flock in the area, by mating inter se of the members of a combination of the genotypic groups and applying a selection program for the criterions aimed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Vanlı, Y., Kaygısız, A. (2024). Some General Comments on The Results For Sheep Breeding Researches at Atatürk University Farm. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 508–517. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1352677

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. Aktaş A., Dursun, Ş., Halıcı, İ., Demirci, U., Akil, K., & Büyükbaş, l (2016). Mature Live Weights and Some Reproductive Characteristics of Orta Anadolu Merinosu Sheep under Breeder Conditions. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 13(3), 13 - 19.
  2. Altın, T., Karaca, O., Cemal, İ., Yılmaz, M., & Yılmaz O. (2005). The Fattening and Carcass Characteristics of Kıvırcık and Karya Lambs. Animal Production, 46(1), 19-29.
  3. Anonim, (1996). T.İ.G.E.M, Malya Tarım İşletmesi Müdürlüğü Kayıtları. Boztepe -Kırşehir.
  4. Çolakoğlu, N., & Özbeyaz, C. (1999). Comparison of Some Production Traits in Malya and Akkaraman Sheep. Turkish. Journal of Veterinary Animal Sciences, 23, 351-360.
  5. Dayıoğlu, H., Doğru, Ü., & Esenboğa, N (1995). Süt Protein Tipleri İle Koyunların Laktasyon Özellikleri ve Kuzuların Büyüme Karakteristikleri Arasındaki İlişkiler. TUBİTAK VHAG-1030 nolu proje kesin raporu.
  6. Dellal, G., Söylemezoğlu, F., Etikan, S., & Erdoğan, Z (2000). Investigation of Some Physical and Morphological Characteristics of Wool of Malya Sheep. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(02), 48-53.
  7. Duncan, D. B., (1955). Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics, 11(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478. Düzgüneş, O & Pekel, E. (1968). Orta Anadolu şartlarında Çeşitli Merinos x Akkaraman Melezlerinin Verimle İlgili Özellikleri Üzerinde Mukayeseli Araştırmalar. Ank. Üniv. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 312, 1968; Ankara.
  8. Ekiz, B.,.Özcan, M., Yılmaz, A., & Ceyhan, A. 2005. Türk Merinoslarında (Karacabey Merinosu) Koyun Verimliliği Özelliklerine Ait Fenotipik ve Genetik Parametre Tahminleri. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 29 (2), 557-564.
  9. Filya, İ., Ak, İ., Karabulut, A., Koyuncu, M., & Akgündüz, V. (1995). Determining of Fattening Performance of Mutton Breed*Merino Crossbred (F1) Lambs. Uludağ Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 11 (1), 155-164.
  10. Güney, O (1971). Malya ve Anadolu Merinoslarının Normal Bakım ve Yemleme Şartlarında Mukayesesi. Çayır-Mera ve Zootekni Araş. Enst. Yayın No: 17, 1971; Ankara
  11. Harvey, W. R. (1977). User's guide for LSML76: Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University.
  12. Karataş, Ş. (1973). Comparison of Merino*Morkaraman Genotypes for Some Traits. Atatürk University Agriculture Faculty, TÜBİTAK VHAG-23/51 d Project Final Report, Erzurum
  13. Kaymakçı, M., & Taşkın, T. (2008). Sheep Crossbreeding Studies in Türkiye. Hayvansal Üretim, 49(2), 43-51.
  14. Kırbaş M, Bülbül B, & Kal, Y., (2022). Some reproductive traits in central Anatolian merino sheep under breeder conditions. Journal of Advances in Vetbio Science and Techniques, 7(1), 14 - 18. 10.31797/vetbio.1018631
  15. Kırmızıbayrak, T., Aksoy, A., Saatcı, M., & Tilki, M (2005). Tuj ve Morkaraman Koyunların Süt Verimi ve Meme Özellikleri İle Bu Özellikler Arasındaki İlişkiler. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 11 - 15.
  16. Köprücü, E. (1974). The Estimation of Reproduction Traits of Atatürk University Merino and Morkaraman Flock. (Unpressed Doctoral Thesis). Atatürk University Agriculture Faculty Animal Science Department, Erzurum.
  17. Küçük, M., Öztürk, Y., & Bayram, D (2000). Yarı-entansif şartlarda Hamdani, Karagül ve Morkaraman koyunlarının süt verimi özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 44 - 48.
  18. Lacin, E, & Aksoy, A.R. (2003). Kars Bölgesinde Yetiştirilen Morkaraman ve Tuj Koyunlarının Döl Verimi Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 5 - 7.
  19. Özcan, M., Yılmaz, A., Ekiz, B., & Ceyhan, A (2004). The Effects of Some Environmental Factors Affecting on The Growth And Greasy Fleece Yield at First Shearing of Turkish Merino (Karacabey Merino) Lambs. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 159 - 167.
  20. Özsoy, M.K. (1974). The Estimation of Some Parameters Wool Traits of Atatürk University Merino Flock. (Unpressed Doctoral Thesis). Atatürk University Agriculture Faculty Animal Science Department, Erzurum.
  21. Özsoy, M.K., &. Vanlı, Y (1985). Merinos, Morkaraman ve Ivesi ırkları ile bunların iki-ırk melezlerinin koyun verim özellikleri bakımından değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk University Agriculture Faculty, TÜBİTAK VHAG-626. Project Final Report, Erzurum
  22. Özsoy, M.K., (1982). Merinos x Morkaraman x İvesi üçlü melez kuzuların verim özellikleri üzerine karşılaştırmalı araştırma. Atatürk University Agriculture Faculty, TÜBİTAK VHAG-300. Project Final Report, Erzurum
  23. Özyürek, S (2020). Investigation of Relationship between Udder Morphology, Lactation Traits and Milk Components in Morkaraman and Awassi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 268 - 274. 10.17714/gumusfenbil.630056
  24. Savaş, İ., Yılmaz, İ & Yanar, M (2020). Some Reproductive Traits of Morkaraman Sheep Breeds Raised in Semi Nomadic Livestock Activities. International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Science, 6(1), 100 - 107. 10.24180/ijaws.637369
  25. Sönmez, R., Kaymakçı, M., Eliçin, A., Tuncel, E., Wassmuth, R., & Taşkın, T. (2009). Improvement Studies in Türkiye Sheep Husbandry. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 43-65. ziraatuludag/issue/ 16754/174183
  26. Taşkın, T., Özder, M., Atıl, H., & Kaymakçı, M., (1999). Suffolk X B.Leicester X Merinos Melezi Kuzularda Besi ve Karkas Özellikleri Arasındaki Fenotipik Korelasyonlar. Tr. J. Veterinary And Animal Sciences. 23 (1), 203-208.
  27. Taşkın., T., Kaymakçı, M., Sönmez, R, Yılmaz, M., & Bardakçıoğlu, E., (2012). Genetic and Non-Genetic Parameter Estimates For Growth Traits Of Sonmez Lambs. Veterinarija İr Zootechnika (Vet Med Zoot). 60(82), 79-83.
  28. TUİK (2022). Animal Production Statistics, 2022. TUİK Newsletter 09 February 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hayvansal-Uretim-Istatistikleri-2022-49682
  29. Tuncer, S., & Cengiz, F (2018). Fleece Yield and Characteristics in White karaman, Anatolian Merino, Ile de France X White Karaman (G1) and Ile de France X Anatolian Merino (G1) Crossbreds. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 28(3), 353 - 357. 10.29133/yyutbd. 419370
  30. Üçtepe, A (2016). Quantitative Consideration of Cross Breeding Studies Conducted in Turkey to Improve Fattening Features in Sheep. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 13(2), 75 - 84.
  31. Ünal, N. (1998). Orta Anadolu Merinoslarında Önemli Verim Özellikleri Ve Bunların Geliştirilmesi İçin Bir Seleksiyon İndeksinin Hesaplanması. Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, (basılmamış doktara tezi)
  32. Vanlı, Y. (1974). Genetic and Phenotypic Parameters for Fleece and Milk Characteristics in Atatürk University Morkaraman Flock. (Unpressed Doctoral Thesis). Atatürk University Agriculture Faculty Animal Science Department, Erzurum.
  33. Yılmaz, A., & Altınel, A. (2013). The effects of some environmental factors affecting on the milk production and growth characteristics of the German Black-Headed Mutton x F j (Chios x Kıvırcık) crossbreds in comparison with Kıvırcık and Turkish Merinos. J. Fac. Vet. Med. Istanbul Univ, 29(2), 259-266.
  34. Ekiz, B.,.Özcan, M., Yılmaz, A., & Ceyhan, A. 2005. Türk Merinoslarında (Karacabey Merinosu) Koyun Verimliliği Özelliklerine Ait Fenotipik ve Genetik Parametre Tahminleri. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 29 (2), 557-564.
  35. Kırbaş M, Bülbül B, & Kal, Y., (2022). Some reproductive traits in central Anatolian merino sheep under breeder conditions. Journal of Advances in Vetbio Science and Techniques, 7(1), 14 - 18. 10.31797/vetbio.1018631
  36. Özsoy, M.K., &. Vanlı, Y (1985). Merinos, Morkaraman ve Ivesi ırkları ile bunların iki-ırk melezlerinin koyun verim özellikleri bakımından değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk University Agriculture Faculty, TÜBİTAK VHAG-626. Project Final Report, Erzurum
  37. Sönmez, R., Kaymakçı, M., Eliçin, A., Tuncel, E., Wassmuth, R., & Taşkın, T. (2009). Improvement Studies in Türkiye Sheep Husbandry. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 43-65. ziraatuludag/issue/ 16754/174183
  38. Yılmaz, A., & Altınel, A. (2013). The effects of some environmental factors affecting on the milk production and growth characteristics of the German Black-Headed Mutton x F j (Chios x Kıvırcık) crossbreds in comparison with Kıvırcık and Turkish Merinos. J. Fac. Vet. Med. Istanbul Univ, 29(2), 259-266.