Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2016 / Volume: 29 Issue: 4

A STUDY ON TESTS OF HYPOTHESIS BASED ON RIDGE ESTIMATOR

Pages
—
Publication Date
2016-12-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, a real data example is presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The literature of Ridge regression include many articles that deal with point estimation of the coefficients vector .
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of them is introduced by Halawa and Basuiouni[1] who present non-exact tests based on Ridge regression by using two different biasing parameters (k) which are proposed by Hoerl and Kennard [2] and Hoerl et al. [3].
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, a real data example is presented.
🔬Design:Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biasing factors · Ridge regression · Hypothesis testing

Abstract

The literature of Ridge regression include many articles that deal with point estimation of the coefficients vector . However, few of them tackle the statistical inference problem about or some of its components. One of them is introduced by Halawa and Basuiouni[1] who present non-exact tests based on Ridge regression by using two different biasing parameters (k) which are proposed by Hoerl and Kennard [2] and Hoerl et al. [3]. Thus, we investigate others popular k values used the Ridge regression for testing significance of regression coefficients. We compare tests in terms of type I error rates and powers by using Monte Carlo simulation. In addition, a real data example is presented.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gökpınar, E., Ebegil, M. (2016). A STUDY ON TESTS OF HYPOTHESIS BASED ON RIDGE ESTIMATOR. Gazi University Journal of Science, Volume: 29 Issue: 4. https://ajindex.com/articles/1269445

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (80)

  1. A.M. Halawa and M.Y.E. Basuiouni, “Tests of
  2. Regression Coefficients under Ridge Regression
  3. Models”, Journal of Statistical Computation and
  4. Simulation, 65, 2000, pp. 341-356.
  5. A.E. Hoerl and R.W. Kennard, “Ridge regression:
  6. biased estimation for non-orthogonalproblems”,
  7. Technometrics,12, 1970, pp. 55–67.
  8. A.E. Hoerl, R.W. Kennard and K.F. Baldwin, “Ridge
  9. regression: some simulation”, Communications in
  10. Statistics, 5, 1975,pp. 105–123.
  11. C.M. Theobald, “Generalizations of Mean Square
  12. Error Applied to Ridge Regression”, Journal of the
  13. Royal Statistical Society. Series B
  14. (Methodolojical), 36, 1974,pp.103-106.
  15. J.F. Lawless and P. Wang, “A Simulation Study of
  16. Ridge and Other Regression Estimators”,
  17. Communications in Statistics: Theory and
  18. Methods,7, 1976, pp. 139-164.
  19. A.P. Dempster, M. Schatzoff and N. Wermuth, “A
  20. Simulation Study of Alternatives to Ordinary Least
  21. Squares”, Journal of the American Statistical
  22. Association, 72, 1977,pp. 77-91.
  23. D.G. Gibbons, “A Simulation Study of Some Ridge
  24. Estimators”, Journal of the American Statistical
  25. Association, 76, 1981,pp.131-139.
  26. A. K. Md. E. Saleh and B.M.G. Kibria,
  27. “Performances of Some New Preliminary Test
  28. Ridge Regression Estimators and Their Properties”,
  29. Communicationsin Statistics: Theory and Methods,, 1993,pp. 2747-2764.
  30. B.M.G. Kibria, “Performance of Some New Ridge
  31. Regression Estimators”, Communications in
  32. Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 32,,pp. 419-435.
  33. G. Khalaf and G. Shukur, “Choosing Ridge
  34. Parameters for Regression Problems”,
  35. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods,, 2005,pp.1177-1182.
  36. J. Zhang and M. Ibrahim, “A Simulation Study on
  37. SPSS Ridge Regression and Ordinary Least
  38. Squares Regression Procedures for Multicolliearity
  39. data”, Journal of Applied Statistics, 32, 2005,pp.
  40. A.K.Md.E. Saleh, “Theory of Preliminary Test and
  41. Stein-Type Estimation with Applications”, Wiley,
  42. New York, 2006.
  43. M. Alkhamisi, G. Khalaf and G. Shukur, “Some
  44. Modifications for Choosing Ridge Parameters”,
  45. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods,, 2006,pp. 2005-2020.
  46. M. Alkhamisi and G. Shukur, “Developing Ridge
  47. Parameters for SUR Model”, Communications in
  48. Statistics -Theory and Methods, 37, 2008,pp. 544-
  49. G. Muniz and B.M.G. Kibria, “On Some Ridge
  50. Regression Estimators: An Empirical
  51. Comparisons”, Communications in Statistics-
  52. Simulation and Computation, 38, 2009,pp. 621-
  53. F. Gökpınar and M. Ebegil, “A Comparative Study
  54. on Ridge Estimators in Regression Problems”,
  55. Journal of SainsMalaysiana, 2014 (in submission).
  56. E.P. Liski, “A Test of the Mean Square Error
  57. Criterion for shrinkage Estimators”,, 1982,pp. 543-562.
  58. E.P. Liski, “Choosing a shrinkage Estimator-a test
  59. of the Mean Square Error Criterion”, Proc. First
  60. Tampere Sem. Linear Models, 1983,pp. 245-262.
  61. R.L. Obenchain, “Classical F-Tests and Confidence
  62. Regions for Ridge Regression”, Technometrics, 19,, pp. 429-439.
  63. D. Coutsourides and C.G. Troskie, “F and t Tests
  64. for a General Class of Estimators”, South African
  65. Statistical Journal, 13, 1979,pp. 113-119.
  66. A. Ullah, R.A.L. Carter and V.K. Srivastova, “The
  67. Sampling Distribution of Shrinkage Estimators and
  68. their F Ratio in Regression Model”, Journal of
  69. Econometrics, 25, 1984,pp. 109-122.
  70. M. Karakuş, A. Bayrak, E. Çalıkoğlu and M.
  71. Kıralan, “Comparison of oxidation stability of
  72. virgin olive oils from different locations of
  73. Turkey”, ActaAlimentaria, 43, 2014, pp. 133-141.
  74. H.Woods, H.H. Steinour, and H.R. Starke, “Effect
  75. of composition of Portland cement on heat evolved
  76. during hardening, Ind. Eng. Chem.”, 24, 1932, pp.
  77. M. Ebegil, F. Gökpınar, “A Test Statistic to Choose
  78. Between Liu-Type and Least Squares Estimator
  79. Based on Mean Square Error Criteria”, Journal of
  80. Applied Statistics, 39(10), 2012, pp. 2081-2096.