SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

ORGANIZATIONAL WISDOM AND ITS IMPACT ON FIRM INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE

ÖRGÜTSEL BİLGELİK VE FİRMA YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ VE PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ

Ali Ekber AKGÜN
Sümeyye YÜCEBİLGİLLİ KIRÇOVALI
Pages
193–202
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further, we argued the managerial and theoretical implications of the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a fascinating concept, the term organizational wisdom started to attract many researchers from a variety of disciplines.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nevertheless, how the organizational wisdom related practices, such as virtue and practicality, impact the firm innovativeness and financial performance is rarely argued in the literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further, we argued the managerial and theoretical implications of the study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel Bilgelik · Firma Yenilikçiliği · Firma Performansı

Abstract

As a fascinating concept, the term organizational wisdom started to attract many researchers from a variety of disciplines. Nevertheless, how the organizational wisdom related practices, such as virtue and practicality, impact the firm innovativeness and financial performance is rarely argued in the literature. We argued that virtue and practicality practices positively impact the firm’s innovativeness with increasing level of environmental uncertainty. We also mentioned that firm innovativeness positively mediates the relationship between organizational wisdom and firm financial performance. Further, we argued the managerial and theoretical implications of the study.

Özet

Önemli bir kavram olan, örgütsel bilgelik kavramı birçok alandaki araştırmacıların dikkatini çekmektedir. Fakat örgütsel bilgeliğin bileşenlerini oluşturan değişkenlerin veya örgütsel uygulamaların erdemlilik ve pratik olma gibi örgütün yenilikçiliği ve finansal performansı üzerine olan etkilerini tartışan çalışmalar çok azdır. Bu çalışmada, erdemlilik ve pratik olma uygulamalarının artan çevresel belirsizlikle firma yenilikçiliğini etkilediği tartışılmıştır. Ayrıca firma yenilikçiliğinin örgütsel bilgelik uygulamaları ile firmanın finansal performansı arasında kısmı bir aracı rol oynadığı anlatılmıştır. Son olarak, çalışmanın teorik ve yönetsel uygulamaları anlatılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

AKGÜN, A. E., KIRÇOVALI, S. Y. (2015). ORGANIZATIONAL WISDOM AND ITS IMPACT ON FIRM INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 193–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/126926

References (13)

  1. BARGE, J.K., LITTLE, M. (2002). Dialogical wisdom, communicative practice, and organizational life. Communication Research, 12 (4), pp. 375-397.
  2. BIERL, P., KESSLER, E., CHRISTENSEN, E. (2000). Organizational learning, knowledge and wisdom. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13 (6), pp. 595-618.
  3. BOWEN, F.E., ROSTAMI, M., STEEL, P. (2010). Timing is everything: A meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 63 (11), pp. 1179-1185.
  4. BROWN, A.D., STARKEY, K. (2000). Organizational identity and learning: A Psychodynamic Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25, pp. 102-120.
  5. CALANTONE, R.J., CAVUSGIL, T.S., ZHAO, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, pp. 515-524.
  6. CAMERON, K.S., BRIGHT, D., CAZA, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance, American Behavioral Scientist, 4, pp. 766– 790. CAZA, A., BARKER, B.A., CAMERON, K.S. (2004). Ethics and ethos: The buffering and amplifying effects of ethical behavior and virtuousness, Journal of Business Ethics, 52, (2), pp. 169-178.
  7. CHOI, B., JONG, A.M. (2010). Assessing the impact of knowledge management strategies announcements on the market value of firms. Information & Management, 47 (1), pp. 42- 52. COOPER, L.P. (2003). A research agenda to reduce risk in new product development through knowledge management: A practitioner perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20, pp. 117–140.
  8. DESPHANDE, J.U., Webster, F.E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A Quadrad Analysis. Journal of Marketing 57, pp. 23– 37. FINEMAN, S. (1996). Emotion and organizing. In: S.R. CLEGG, C. HARDY, W.R. NORD (ed), The handbook of organizational studies, London, Sage, pp. 543-564.
  9. GRANT, R.M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7, pp. 375–387.
  10. GREAVES, C.E., ZACHER, H., MCKENNA, B., ROONEY, D. (2014). Wisdom and narcissism as predictors of transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35 (4), pp. 335-358.
  11. HALVERSON, R. (2004). Accessing, documenting, and communicating practical wisdom: The phronesis of school leadership practice. American Journal of Education, 111 (1), pp. 90–112.
  12. HUGHES, G.J.(2001).
  13. Aristotle on ethics. Routledge, London.