Journals / BELLETEN / 2001 / Cilt: 65 - Sayı: 243

Hakkari Steles: Warrior-Shepherds in Eastern Anatolia, A Preliminary Note

Hakkari Stelleri: Doğu Anadolu'da Savaşçı Çobanlar İlk Not

Journal
BELLETEN
Pages
501–518
Publication Date
2001-08-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In particular and despite the great time gap, the anthropomorphic grave stones of the Göktürk era in Central Asia represent a close parallel due to the vessels being held in both hands.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Thirteen stone steles were recovered in 1998 from the north flank of the medieval citadel situated in the center of the city of Hakkari.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The steles, which range in height from 0.70 m to 3.10 m, were worked on only one face.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In particular and despite the great time gap, the anthropomorphic grave stones of the Göktürk era in Central Asia represent a close parallel due to the vessels being held in both hands.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hakkari · Stele · Eastern Anatolia

Abstract

Thirteen stone steles were recovered in 1998 from the north flank of the medieval citadel situated in the center of the city of Hakkari. The steles, which range in height from 0.70 m to 3.10 m, were worked on only one face. Eleven of the steles depict males, nude except for a codpiece. A wide belt encircles their waists, suspended from which is a short, curved dagger, all identical. The figures each hold a vessel, clearly made from a skin, in both of their hands. A variety of artifacts and figures-metal weaponry, such as axes, daggers, knives, and spears, wild game animals, like mountain goats and deer, and human figures-are also worked on the surface of the steles. Noteworthy is the depiction of dome-shaped tents, typical of steppe dwellers. Two of the steles are assumed to have belonged to females, because they display characteristics of a different type. The Hakkari steles were sculpted by different hands, but they follow the guidelines of a common iconography. The steles belonged to a powerful ruling elite who resided in these tents. The typological properties of the weapons, such as the axes and daggers, permit the steles to be assigned to the second half of the second millenium B.C. The occurrence in ancient Anatolia and the Near East of these kinds of stones is rather rare. By contrast, hundreds of specimens have been recovered on the Eurasian steppes that derive from the long interval between the third millenium B.C. and A.D. twelfth century. In particular and despite the great time gap, the anthropomorphic grave stones of the Göktürk era in Central Asia represent a close parallel due to the vessels being held in both hands.

Özet

1998 yılında Hakkari kent merkezinde tesadüfen 13 taş stel ele geçirildi. Üzerlerinde daima cepheden bir insan yüzü ve bedeninin üst kısmı gösterilmiştir. Çıplak olarak betimlenen bu figürlerden 11'inde erkeklik organı bir suspansuvar altına gizlenmiştir. Diğer iki stelin ise kadınlara ait olması olasıdır. Yanlarında balta, mızrak, topuz gibi silahlar, belde kemer ve daima bir hançer vardır. Ayrıca steller üzerinde bozkır türü çadırlar, leopar avı ve yaban keçilerine saldıran leoparlar ve kimi küçük erkek ve bir kadın figürü de resmedilmiştir. Doğu Anadolu'ya yabancı olan bu taşlar Avrasya bozkır kültürünün bir parçasıdır. Silah tiplerine dayanılarak M.Ö. II. binyılın ortaları ile sonları arasında bir yere tarihlenmeleri mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEVİN, V., ÖZFIRAT, A. (2001). Hakkari Steles: Warrior-Shepherds in Eastern Anatolia, A Preliminary Note. BELLETEN, Cilt: 65 - Sayı: 243, 501–518. https://ajindex.com/articles/126886

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ANLAĞAN, Ç. ve Ö. BİLGİ, 1989. Sadberk Hanım Museum. Weapons of the Protohistoric Age, İstanbul.
  2. BAIBOSYNOV, K. 1996.
  3. Stone Sculptures of Zhambyl Region, Alma Ata. BAYAR, D. 1997. The Turkic Stone Statues of Central Mongolia, Ulan-Bator (Moğolca) BOEHMER, R.M. 1998. "Skytische Grabstelen aus Muğesir (Nordost-Irak), Baghdater Mitteilungen 29: 81-88.
  4. BURNEY, C.A. 1958. "Eastern Anatolia in the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age", Anatolian Studies VIII: 157-209. -------, 1972. "Excavations at Haftavan Tepe 1969", Iran X: 127-142. -------, 1989. "Hurrians and Proto-Indo-Europeans: The Ethnic Context of the Early Trans-Caucasian Culture", Anatolia and the Ancient Near East. Studies in Honor of Tahsin Özgüç (yay.haz. K. Emre ve diğ.) Ankara: 45-51.
  5. BURNEY, C.A. ve D.M. LANG, 1971. The Peoples of the Hills: Ancient Ararat and Caucasus, London. CHERNYKH, E.N. 1992. Ancient Metallurgy in the USSR. The Early Metal Age, Cambridge. CONTENAU, G., R. GHIRSHMAN, 1935. Fouilles du Tepe-Giyan pres de Nehavend 1931 et 1932,
  6. Paris. ÇORUHLU, Y. 1999. "Kurgan ve Çadır (Yurt)'dan Kümbet ve Türbeye Geçiş", Geçmişten Günümüze Mezarlık Kültürü ve İnsan Hayatına Etkileri Sempozyumu. 18-20 Aralık 1998, İstanbul: 47-56.
  7. DİYARBEKİRLİ, N. 1972.
  8. Hun Sanatı, İstanbul.
  9. DJAPARIDZE, O. 1993. "Über die ethnokulturelle Situation in Georgien gegen Ende des 3. Jahrtausends v.Chr.", Between the Rivers and Over the Mountains. Archaeologica Anatolica et Mesopotamica Alba Palmieri Dedicata (yay.haz. M. Frangipane ve diğ.) Roma: 475-491.
  10. DYSON, R.H. JR. 1964. "Notes on weapons and Chronology in Northern Iran around 1000 B.C.", Dark Ages and Nomads c. 1000 B.C. Studies in Iranian and Anatolian Archaeology (yay.haz. R. Ghirshman, et. all.) İstanbul: 32-45. ------, 1989. "The Iron Age Architecture at Hasanlu: An Essay", Expedition 31/2-3: 107-127.
  11. EDENS, C. 1995. "Transcaucasia at the End of the Early Bronze Age", Bulletin of the American Schoools of Oriental Research 299/300: 53-64.
  12. ELEUKENOVA, G. 1999. Ouerk Istorii Srednevekovoy Skulpturi Kazakistana, Almatı (Rusça) ESİN, E. 1969. "'The Cup Rites in Inner-Asian and Turkish Art", Forschungen zur Kunst Asiens. In Memoriam Kurt Erdmann, İstanbul:224-261. ------, 1972. "Ötüken İllerinde M.S. Sekizinci ve Dokuzuncu Yüzyıllarda Türk Abidelerinde Sanatkar Adları" (yay.haz. H. İnalcık ve diğ.), Türk Kültürü El Kitabı Il/la, İstanbul: 44-58.
  13. FRUMKIN, G. 1970.
  14. Archaeology in Soviet Central Asla, Leiden/Köln. GAMKRELIDZE, T.V. ve V.V. IVANOV 1985. "The Ancien