Journals / BELLETEN / 2004 / Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 251

Venus Prometor From Mythos to Politics a Divine Key Figure in the Relations Between Rome and Aphrodisias

Mitostan Siyasete Venüs Prometor -Roma-Aphrodisias İlişkisinde Etkin Tanrısal Bir Figür-

Journal
BELLETEN
Pages
33–62
Publication Date
2004-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a sufficient ground in this intimate tie between the emperors and the Aphrodisians: "the Cult of Venus." It is obvious that the emperors' claim that they were the progenies of Venus Prometor (Venus the First Mother) in Aphrodisias, where her cult had already been deeply rooted, was quite respected.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main objective of this article is to illuminate the place of the cult of Venus in the political relations between Rome and Aphrodisias during the Imperial Era and evaluate the involvement of the beliefs in Venus into the Roman foreign policy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aphrodisias, a Carian settlement and a well known cult center of Venus, lived its golden age under the Roman rule which increasingly expanded from the 2nd century B.C. onwards over Asia Minor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a sufficient ground in this intimate tie between the emperors and the Aphrodisians: "the Cult of Venus." It is obvious that the emperors' claim that they were the progenies of Venus Prometor (Venus the First Mother) in Aphrodisias, where her cult had already been deeply rooted, was quite respected.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rome · Aphrodisias · Anatolia

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to illuminate the place of the cult of Venus in the political relations between Rome and Aphrodisias during the Imperial Era and evaluate the involvement of the beliefs in Venus into the Roman foreign policy. Aphrodisias, a Carian settlement and a well known cult center of Venus, lived its golden age under the Roman rule which increasingly expanded from the 2nd century B.C. onwards over Asia Minor. The victory of the Roman imperialism over the Helenistic world can be regarded as a turning point for the Aphrodisians in terms of their economic and urban development. Archaeological finds, mostly inscriptions unearthed at the site, present them as the most favoured nation among the subjects of the Empire and their city as the most privileged. It is highly probable that the economic and political grants offered by the emperors through Senatus Consultum to Aphrodisias not only ensured the continuous loyalty of its inhabitants and thus a strong base essentially needed by the Roman State in order to facilitate its eastward expansionist policy but also motivated other Anatolian cities to submit. There was a sufficient ground in this intimate tie between the emperors and the Aphrodisians: "the Cult of Venus." It is obvious that the emperors' claim that they were the progenies of Venus Prometor (Venus the First Mother) in Aphrodisias, where her cult had already been deeply rooted, was quite respected.

Özet

Aphrodisias, "Roma İmparatorluk Çağı'nda Anadolu" dendiği vakit ilk akla gelen, hatta adları önemle anılan yerleşim alanlarından biridir. Karia'nın önemli bir kenti, Anadolu'nun ünlü bir kült merkezidir. Roma nezdindeki yeri ise hayli özeldir. İlk yerleşimleri tarih öncesi devirlere uzanan Anadolu'nun binlerce yıllık geçmişi içinde oldukça sıradan duran yöre, "Aphrodisias" adıyla sergilediği sosyo-kültürel ve kentsel kimliğine İ.Ö. 2. yüzyılda, diğer bir deyişle Geç Helenistik/Erken Roma Dönemi'nde bürünmüştür. Gerek Roma emperyalizminin Helenistik dünya üzerindeki yengisi, gerekse o dünyanın en önemli kavşağı olan Anadolu'nun Roma İmparatorluğu'na eklenmesi açısından bir dönüm noktası olan bu yüzyıl, siyasi alanda yitip giden özgürlüklerle bir sonu simgeler görünse de, Aphrodisias için yeni başlangıçlar demektir. Yöre, çağdaşı olan bir çok kenti imrendiren zenginliğine ve bu zenginliğe yakışır kentsel görkemine bu dönemde kapı aralamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURNA, G. E. (2004). Venus Prometor From Mythos to Politics a Divine Key Figure in the Relations Between Rome and Aphrodisias. BELLETEN, Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 251, 33–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/126865

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Alexiou, Stylianos. Minos Uygarlığı, çev. Elif Tül Tulunay. İstanbul: Arkeoloji Yay., 1991.
  2. Alkım, Handan. "Explorations and Excavations in Turkey: 1967 and 1968." Anatolica, c.III (1969-1970), s. 1-92. Appian. Roman History III (The Civil Wars - Books I-III), çev. Horace White. London: William Heinemann Ltd., MCMLXIV (1964).
  3. Aulock, Hans Von ed. SNG Karien (Sylloge Nummorum Graecorum -Karien), c. 7 (No. 2334-2867), Berlin: The British Academy Deutsches Archaeologisches Institut Verlag Gebr. Mann., 1962.
  4. Badian, E. "Notes on Some Documents from Aphrodisias Concerning Octavian." GRBS (Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies), c. 25 (1984), s. 157-170.
  5. Bailey, Cyril. Religion in Virgil. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1935.
  6. Bean, George E. Turkey Beyond the Meander. London: John Murray, 1989.
  7. Bergren, Ann L. T. "The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite: Tradition and Rhetoric, Praise and Blame." Class. Ant. (Classical Antiquity),c. 8, no. 1 (April 1989), s. 1-41.
  8. Blümel, Wolfgang. "Die Inschriften von Iasos." IGSK (Inschriften Griechischer Stadte Aus Kleinasien), c.28, II, 2,1985. -----. "Die Inschriften von Mylasa." IGSK (Inschriften Griechischer Stadte Aus Kleinasien), c. 34,1,1987.
  9. Boeckhius, Augustus ed. CIG, c. II. Berolini Ex Officina Academica, 1843. Boeckhius, Augustus ed. CIG (Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum), c. II (Berolini Ex Officina Academica, 1843). Subsidia Epigraphica, Quellen und Abhanlungen Zur Griechischen Epigrafik, ed. H. Engelmann 8c R. Merkelbach. New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 1977.
  10. Branigan, Keith. "The Genesis of the Household Goddess." Studi Micenei ed Anatolici (Edizioni Dell'Ateneo, Roma), c. 8 (1969), s. 28-38.
  11. Brewster, Harry. Classical Anatolia; The Glory of Hellenism. London: I. B. Tauris & Co Ltd., 1993.
  12. Brown, Laurence. "Sales List." Seaby Coin & Medal Bulletin, no. 816 (December, 1986), s. 382-406.
  13. Burnett, A.M. 'The Iconography of Roman Coin Types in the Third Century B.C." JVC (Numismatic Chronicle), c. 146 (1986), s. 67-75.
  14. Chastagnol, Andre et al. ed., "Asie Mineure." L'Annee Epigraphique. Paris: Presses Universitaires De France, 1980, s. 234-242.
  15. Clayton, Peter ed. "Sales List." Seaby Coin and Medal Bulletin, no. 841 (June, 1989), s. 140-158. -----. "Sales List." Seaby Coin and Medal Bulletin, no. 828 (March, 1988), s. 50, C 101. Cook, Arthur Bernard. Zeus, A Study In Ancient Religion, c. I. New York: Biblo & Tannen, 1964.
  16. Cormack, Robin. "The Temple as the Cathedral." Aphrodisias Papers: Recent Work On Architecture and Sculpture, ed. Charlo