SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 37 Issue: 3

A New Species Richness Measure Improved From Margalef And Menhinick Indices

Kürşad Özkan(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8526-7243
Serkan Özdemir(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9425-3724
Ali Şenol(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0237-6215
Ecir Küçüksille(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3293-9878
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-09-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To better understand the performance of (_ ^(α^*))D_MM , further studies should be generated using various types of real ecological data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study, a new estimator ((_ ^(α^*))D_MM ) is proposed to measure species richness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To evaluate the performance of (_ ^(α^*))D_MM , both hypothetical and natural community datasets were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To better understand the performance of (_ ^(α^*))D_MM , further studies should be generated using various types of real ecological data.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Alpha diversity · Assemblage · BİÇEB software

Abstract

In the present study, a new estimator ((_ ^(α^*))D_MM ) is proposed to measure species richness. Its’ essential inputs are alfa (α) scale parameters of Margalef (D_MG ) and Menhinick (D_MN ) indices. To evaluate the performance of (_ ^(α^*))D_MM , both hypothetical and natural community datasets were used. The computations were performed using a spreadsheet program created for (_ ^(α^*))D_MM . The new proposed estimator is also integrated into the BİÇEB software. According to estimation results, (_ ^(α^*))D_MM seems to be a better form rather than D_MG and D_MN. Therefore it may be employed for comparing species richness of the natural communities. To better understand the performance of (_ ^(α^*))D_MM , further studies should be generated using various types of real ecological data.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkan, K., Özdemir, S., Şenol, A., Küçüksille, E. (2024). A New Species Richness Measure Improved From Margalef And Menhinick Indices. Gazi University Journal of Science, Volume: 37 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1336792

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Özkan, K., “Application of information theory for an entropic gradient of ecological sites”, Entropy, 18(10): 1-8, (2016).
  2. Pärtel, M., Szava-Kovats, R., Zobel, M., “Dark diversity: shedding light on absent species”, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26(3): 124-128, (2011).
  3. Özkan, K., “Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Bileşenleri (α. β ve γ) Nasıl Ölçülür (1. Basım)”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayını, Isparta (In Turkish), (2016).
  4. Shannon, C.E., “A mathematical theory of communication”, The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3): 79-423, (1948).
  5. Simpson, E.H., “Measurement of diversity”, Nature, 163: 688, (1949).
  6. Pielou, E.C., “Ecological diversity”, A Wiley Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, New York, London, Sydney, Toronto, (1975).
  7. Peet, R.K., “The measurement of species diversity”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5: 285-307, (1974).
  8. Thukral, A.K., “A review on measurement of alpha diversity in biology”, Agricultural Research Journal, 54(1): 1-10, (2017).
  9. Menhinick, E.F., “A comparison of some species individuals diversity indices applied to samples of field insects”, Ecology, 45: 859–61, (1964).
  10. Margalef, S.R., “Diversity and stability: a practical proposal and a model of interdependence”, Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, 22: 25-37, (1969).
  11. Odum, H.T., Cantfon, J.E., Kornicker, L.S., “An organizational hierarchy postulate for the interpretation of species-individual distribution, species entropy, ecosystem evolution, and the measuring of species variety index”, Ecology, 41: 395-399, (1960).
  12. Williams, V.L., Witkowski, E.T.F., Balkwill, K., “Application of diversity indices to appraise plant availability in the traditional medical markets of Johannesburg”, South Africa, Biodiversity and Conservation, 14: 2971-3001, (2005).
  13. Davari, N., Jouri, M.H., Ariapour, A., “Comparison of measurement indices of diversity, richness, dominance, and evenness in rangeland ecosystem (case study: Jvaherdeh-Ramesar)”, Journal of Rangeland Science, 2(1): 389-398, (2011).
  14. Umamaheshwari, S., “Algal diversity of a group of fifteen small lakes of T. Narasipur Taluk, Mysore District, Karnataka State”, Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 10(1): 45-50, (2011).
  15. Khan, M.R., Rafi, M.A., Nazir, N., Khan, M.R., Khan, I.A., Hayat, A., Ghaffar, A., Perveen, F., “Biodiversity of butterflies from poonch division of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan”, Journal of Agricultural Technology, 10(4): 885-898, (2014).
  16. Arzamani, K., Vatandoost, H., Rassi, Y., Akhavan, A.A., Abai, M.R., Alavinia, M., Akbarzadeh, K., Mohebali, S., Rafizadeh, S., “Richness and diversity of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in North Khorasan Province, northeast of Iran”, Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases, 12(3): 232, (2018).
  17. Zeinvand, R, Ajourlo, M., Ariapour, A., “Plant species diversity response to animal grazing intensity in semi-steppe rangelands”, Journal of Rangeland Science, 8(4): 383-393, (2018).
  18. Özdemir, S., Negiz, M. G., Turhan, U. U., Şenol, A., Arslan, M., “Indicator plant species of alpha diversity in Kuyucak Mountain district”, Turkish Journal of Forestry, 18(2): 102-109, (2017).
  19. Westhoff, V., Maarel, E.van der., “The Braun-Blanquet approach”, In: R.H., Whittaker (ed.) Ordination and classification of communities, Handbook of Vegetation Science, Junk, The Hague, 5: 617-725, (1973).
  20. Süel, H., Akdemir, D., Ertuğrul, E. T., Özdemir, S., “Determining environmental factors affecting bird diversity”, Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 21(3): 244-251, (2021).
  21. Mulya, H., Santosa, Y., Hilwan, I., “Comparison of four species diversity indices in mangrove community”, Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 22(9): 3648-3655, (2021).
  22. Özkan, K., Küçüksille, E., Mert, A., Gülsoy, S., Süel, H., Başar, M., “A software for Estimating Biodiversity Components (BİÇEB)”, Turkish Journal of Forestry, 21(3): 344-348, (2020).