SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 39 Issue: 1

Spatial Dynamics of Land Use And Land Cover Change Around The İzmir–Aydın Highway (1993–2023)

Gülsüm Ecem Demirdağ(Mersin Üniversitesi)0000-0001-6876-2114
K. Mert Cubukcu(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-3604-7014
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-01-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show a significant transformation in land cover over the 30-year period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the effects of increased accessibility caused by the O-31 Highway on Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) changes within a 10 km buffer zone between 1993 and 2023.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To enhance classification accuracy, remote sensing indices and the pan-sharpening method were integrated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show a significant transformation in land cover over the 30-year period.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Google earth engine · LULC change · Remote sensing

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effects of increased accessibility caused by the O-31 Highway on Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) changes within a 10 km buffer zone between 1993 and 2023. Using multi-band Landsat satellite imagery, LULC classifications were performed through the Random Forest (RF) machine learning algorithm on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. To enhance classification accuracy, remote sensing indices and the pan-sharpening method were integrated. Results show a significant transformation in land cover over the 30-year period. Built-up areas doubled, increasing from 8% in 1993 to 16% in 2023, while bare land expanded from 27% to 45%. Conversely, agricultural areas declined from 35% to 22%, and forest areas from 31% to 16%. Spatial analysis, including transition matrices and kernel density estimation, revealed that the most intense LULC changes were concentrated within the 1–5 km buffer zone and particularly around highway interchanges (entry/exit points). These findings highlight how accessibility-driven development tends to cluster in strategically connected peri-urban areas, aligning with broader observations in urban expansion literature while offering context-specific insights. The study underscores the limitations of current urban planning practices in managing peri-urban growth and protecting agricultural land.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirdağ, G. E., Cubukcu, K. M. (2026). Spatial Dynamics of Land Use And Land Cover Change Around The İzmir–Aydın Highway (1993–2023). Gazi University Journal of Science, Volume: 39 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1643528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (57)

  1. Sezgin, D., “Kentsel saçaklanmanın verimli tarım topraklarının amaç dışı kullanımına etkisi: Ankara örneği”, MSc.Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Science and Technology, Ankara, (2010).
  2. Simmons, I.G., Global environmental history: 10,000 BC to AD 2000, Edinburgh University Press, (2008).
  3. Jensen, J.R., Remote Sensing of the Environment An Earth Resource Perspective 2 nd ed., United States of America, (2014).
  4. Cai, G., Ren, H., Yang, L., Zhang, N., Du, M., Wu, C., “Detailed urban land use land cover classification at the metropolitan scale using a three-layer classification scheme”, Sensors, 19:1–24, (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143120
  5. Li, L., Chen, Y., Yu, X., Liu, R., Huang, C., “Sub-pixel flood inundation mapping from multispectral remotely sensed images based on discrete particle swarm optimization”, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 101: 10–21, (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.11.006
  6. Vaighan, A.A., Talebbeydokhti, N., Bavani, A.M., “Assessing the impacts of climate and land use change on streamflow, water quality and suspended sediment in the Kor River Basin, southwest of Iran”, Environmental Earth Science, 76: 1–18, (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6880-6
  7. Hussein, K., Alkaabi, K., Ghebreyesus, D., Liaqat, M.U., Sharif, H.O., “Land use/land cover change along the Eastern Coast of the UAE and its impact on flooding risk”, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 11: 112–130, (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2019.1707718
  8. Lu, D., Weng, Q., “A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28: 823–870, (2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600746456
  9. Martinuzzi, S., Gould, W.A., Ramos González, O.M., “Land development, land use, and urban sprawl in Puerto Rico integrating remote sensing and population census data”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 79: 288–297, (2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.014
  10. Zhang, X., Han, L., Han, L., Zhu, L., “How well do deep learning-based methods for land cover classification and object detection perform on high resolution remote sensing imagery?”, Remote Sensing, 12: 1–29, (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030417
  11. Harvey, R.O., Clark, W.A. V., “The Nature and Economics of Urban Sprawl”, Land Economics, 41: 1–9, (1965). DOI: https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3144884
  12. Eyoh, A., Olayinka, N., Nwilo, P., Okwuashi, O., Udoudo, D., “Modelling and Predicting Future Urban Expansion of Lagos, Nigeria from Remote Sensing Data Using Logistic Regression and GIS”, International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2: 116–124, (2012).
  13. Nduwayezu, G., “Modeling Urban Growth in Kigali City Rwanda”, MSc.Thesis, University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Enschede, (2015).
  14. Atef, I., Ahmed, W., Abdel-Maguid, R.H., “Modelling of land use land cover changes using machine learning and GIS techniques: a case study in El-Fayoum Governorate, Egypt Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195: 637, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11224-7
  15. Chettry, V., “Geospatial measurement of urban sprawl using multi-temporal datasets from 1991 to 2021: case studies of four Indian medium-sized cities”, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194, (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10542-6
  16. Elburz, Z., Cubukcu, K.M., “Spatial effects of transport infrastructure on regional growth: the case of Turkey”, Spatial Information Research, 29: 19–30, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00332-y
  17. Baum-Snow, N., “Did highways cause suburbanization?”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122: 775–805, (2007).
  18. Khisty, C.J., Lall, B.K., Transportation Engineering: An Introduction 3 rd ed., Prentice Hall (2003).
  19. Abelairas-Etxebarria, P., Astorkiza, I., “Farmland prices and land-use changes in periurban protected natural areas”, Land Use Policy, 29: 674–683, (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.003
  20. Fiedeń, Ł., “Changes in land use in the communes crossed by the A4 motorway in Poland”, Land Use Policy, 85: 397–406, (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.025
  21. Liang, Y., Zeng, J., Sun, W., Zhou, K., Zhou, Z., “Expansion of construction land along the motorway in rapidly developing areas in Cambodia”, Land Use Policy, 109: 1–15, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105691
  22. Müller, K., Steinmeier, C., Küchler, M., “Urban growth along motorways in Switzerland”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 98: 3–12, (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.004
  23. Villarroya, A., Puig, J., “Urban and industrial land-use changes alongside motorways within the Pyrenean area of Navarre, Spain”, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 11: 1213–1220, (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2012.145
  24. Keken, Z., Sebkova, M., Skalos, J., “Analyzing land cover change—The impact of the motorway construction and their operation on landscape structure”, Journal of Geographic Information System, 06: 559–571, (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2014.65046
  25. Zheng, Q., He, S., Huang, L., Zheng, X., Pan, Y., Shahtahmassebi, A.R., Shen, Z., Yu, Z., Wang, K., “Assessing the impacts of Chinese sustainable ground transportation on the dynamics of urban growth: A case study of the Hangzhou Bay Bridge”, Sustainability, 8: 1–20, (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070666
  26. Chi, G., “The impacts of highway expansion on population change: An integrated spatial approach”, Rural Sociology, 75: 58–89, (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00003.x
  27. Garcia-López, M. Àngel, “Urban spatial structure, suburbanization and transportation in Barcelona”, Journal of Urban Economics, 72: 176–190, (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2012.05.003
  28. Kasraian, D., Maat, K., Stead, D., Van Wee, B., “Long-term impacts of transport infrastructure networks on land-use change: an international review of empirical studies”, Transport Reviews, 36: 772–792, (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1168887
  29. Mothorpe, C., Hanson, A., Schnier, K., “The impact of interstate highways on land use conversion”, Annals of Regional Science, 51: 833–870, (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0564-2
  30. Demirel, H., Sertel, E., Kaya, S., Zafer Seker, D., “Exploring impacts of road transportation on environment: a spatial approach”, Desalination, 226: 279–288, (2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.111
  31. Hu, Z., Lo, C.P., “Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression”, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 31: 667–688, (2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPENVURBSYS.2006.11.001
  32. Conway, T.M., “Current and future patterns of land-use change in the coastal zone of New Jersey”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32: 877–893, (2005). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b31170
  33. Duranton, G., Turner, M.A., “Urban growth and transportation”, Review of Economic Studies, 79: 1407–1440, (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rds010
  34. Cihlar, J., “Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: Status and research priorities”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21: 1093–1114, (2000). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/014311600210092
  35. Tamiminia, H., Salehi, B., Mahdianpari, M., Quackenbush, L., Adeli, S., Brisco, B., “Google Earth Engine for geo-big data applications: A meta-analysis and systematic review”, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 164: 152–170, (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.04.001
  36. Vivekananda, G.N., Swathi, R., Sujith, A.V.L.N., “Multi-temporal image analysis for LULC classification and change detection”, European Journal of Remote Sensing, 54: 189–199, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2020.1771215
  37. Koskinen, J., Leinonen, U., Vollrath, A., Ortmann, A., Lindquist, E., d’Annunzio, R., Pekkarinen, A., Käyhkö, N., “Participatory mapping of forest plantations with Open Foris and Google Earth Engine”, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 148: 63–74, (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.12.011
  38. Mirelva, P.R., Nagasawa, “Application of Sentinel-1 data for classifying croplands using Google Earth Engine”, International Journal of Geoinformatics, 15: 21–31, (2019).
  39. Büke, A., Gültekin, M., Aksoy, A., Dıvrak, B.B., Göcek, Ç., Berke, M.Ö., Çeşmeci, H., Büyük Menderes Havza Atlası, İstanbul, (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143120
  40. Sano, E.E., Ferreira, L.G., Asner, G.P., Steinke, E.T., “Spatial and temporal probabilities of obtaining cloud-free Landsat images over the Brazilian tropical savanna”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28: 2739–2752, (2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600981517
  41. Wahelo, T.T., Mengistu, D.A., Merawi, T.M., “Spatiotemporal trends and drivers of forest cover change in Metekel Zone forest areas, Northwest Ethiopia”, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196: 1170, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-13294-7
  42. Prayogi, H., Setiadi, H., Supriatna, S., Dewayany, D., “Land cover change analysis in Majalengka Regency using the pan-sharpening method and random forest machine learning algorithm”, Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi: Kajian, Teori, dan Praktek dalam Bidang Pendidikan dan Ilmu Geografi, 28: 178–192, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um017v28i22023p178-192
  43. Hidayati, I.N., Susanti, E., Utami, W., “Analisis pan-sharpening untuk meningkatkan kualitas spasial citra penginderaan jauh dalam klasifıkasi tata guna tanah”, Bhumi, 3: 122–135, (2017).
  44. Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A., Deering, D.W., “Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS”, III. ERTS Symposium, Washington, DC, 309–317, (1973).
  45. Zha, Y., Gao, J., Ni, S., “Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24: 583–594, (2003). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160304987
  46. Xu, H., “Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27: 3025–3033, (2006). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600589179
  47. He, C., Shi, P., Xie, D., Zhao, Y., “Improving the normalized difference built-up index to map urban built-up areas using a semiautomatic segmentation approach”, Remote Sensing Letters, 1: 213–221, (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.481681
  48. Roy, P., Miyatake, S., Rikimaru, A., “Biophysical spectral response modeling approach for forest density stratification”, The 18th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Dehra, (1997).
  49. Zhao, H., Chen, X., “Use of normalized difference bareness index in quickly mapping bare areas from TM/ETM+”, International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Seoul, 1666–1668, (2005). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2005.1526319
  50. Danacıoğlu, Ş., Öngül, H.C., “Güzelhisar havzasında endüstriyel gelişmenin arazi kullanımı ve arazi örtüsü özellikleri üzerindeki etkisinin bulut tabanlı makine öğrenme teknikleri ile değerlendirilmesi”, Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 32: 135–150, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.51800/ecd.1224255
  51. Amini, S., Saber, M., Rabiei-Dastjerdi, H., Homayouni, S., “Urban Land Use and Land Cover Change Analysis Using Random Forest Classification of Landsat Time Series”, Remote Sensing, 14, (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14112654
  52. Breiman, L., “Random Forests”, Machine Learning, 45, 5–32, (2001). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
  53. Lasaponara, R., Abate, N., Fattore, C., Aromando, A., Cardettini, G., Di Fonzo, M., “On the Use of Sentinel-2 NDVI Time Series and Google Earth Engine to Detect Land-Use/Land-Cover Changes in Fire-Affected Areas”, Remote Sensing, 14, (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194723
  54. Millard, K., Richardson, M., “On the importance of training data sample selection in Random Forest image classification: A case study in peatland ecosystem mapping” Remote Sensing, 7, 8489–8515, (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70708489
  55. Quintero, N., Viedma, O., Urbieta, I.R., Moreno, J.M., “Assessing landscape fire hazard by multitemporal automatic classification of landsat time series using the Google Earth Engine in West-Central Spain”, Forests. 10, (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f10060518
  56. Wessels, K.J., Bergh, F. van den, Roy, D.P., Salmon, B.P., Steenkamp, K.C., MacAlister, B., Swanepoel, D., Jewitt, D.: “Rapid land cover map updates using change detection and robust random forest classifiers”, Remote Sensing, 8, (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8110888
  57. Khisty, C.J., Lall, B.K., Transportation Engineering: An Introduction 3 rd ed., Prentice Hall (2003).