SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 39 Issue: 2

Classification of Neurodegenerative Diseases Using Machine Learning: An Approach Focused on Alzheimer's and Frontotemporal Dementia

Mert Basancelebi(Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi)0009-0003-4611-3326
Ali Narin(Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi)0000-0003-0356-2888
İrem Şenyer Yapıcı(Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi)0000-0003-0655-340X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This finding demonstrates that EEG-based biomarkers, when combined with appropriate machine learning methods, can be transformed into effective tools that provide high reliability and accuracy in clinical decision support systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive neurophysiological measurement method that allows monitoring the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex and is widely used in the diagnosis of neurological diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 22 features were extracted in the signal processing stage, and then this number was reduced to 12 by applying a feature selection method based on the ReliefF algorithm to improve the classification performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This finding demonstrates that EEG-based biomarkers, when combined with appropriate machine learning methods, can be transformed into effective tools that provide high reliability and accuracy in clinical decision support systems.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Alzheimer's disease · Electroencephalography · Feature selection

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive neurophysiological measurement method that allows monitoring the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex and is widely used in the diagnosis of neurological diseases. In this study, EEG-based biomarkers were used to discriminate between Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, and cognitively healthy individuals. A total of 22 features were extracted in the signal processing stage, and then this number was reduced to 12 by applying a feature selection method based on the ReliefF algorithm to improve the classification performance. The selected features were evaluated in both binary and multiclass classification scenarios to reveal the discriminative differences between Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia and healthy control group. According to the findings, in the multiclass classification task, the Fine Decision Tree algorithm achieved the highest accuracy rate of 99.7% when all features were used. In distinguishing cognitively normal individuals from individuals with Alzheimer's disease, both the Fine Decision Tree and Cubic Support Vector Machine algorithms achieved 100% accuracy with all and selected feature sets. To prevent overfitting and evaluate generalization performance, k-fold cross-validation was applied. Feature selection and model parameter tuning were performed only on the training folds; the test folds were not included in these processes. This approach prevents information leakage and provides reliable performance estimation. This finding demonstrates that EEG-based biomarkers, when combined with appropriate machine learning methods, can be transformed into effective tools that provide high reliability and accuracy in clinical decision support systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

Basancelebi, M., Narin, A., Yapıcı, İ. Ş. (2026). Classification of Neurodegenerative Diseases Using Machine Learning: An Approach Focused on Alzheimer's and Frontotemporal Dementia. Gazi University Journal of Science, Volume: 39 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1699476

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Aviles, M., Sánchez-Reyes, L.M., Álvarez-Alvarado, J.M., Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J., “Machine and deep learning trends in eeg-based detection and diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review”, Eng, 5(3): 1464–1484, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5030078
  2. Cao, J., Zhao, Y., Shan, X., Blackburn, D., Wei, J., Erkoyuncu, J.A., Chen, L., Sarrigiannis, P.G., “Ultra-high-resolution time-frequency analysis of eeg to characterise brain functional connectivity with the application in alzheimer’s disease”, Journal of Neural Engineering, 19(4), (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac84ac
  3. Dash, S., “Alzheimer detection based on optimized machine learning for eeg signals”, 3rd International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON), Bengaluru, India, 1–5, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/INOCON60754.2024.10512274
  4. Parihar, A., Swami, P.D., “Analysis of eeg signals with the use of wavelet transform for accurate classification of alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia and healthy subjects using machine learning models”, Fusion: Practice and Applications, 14(2): 43–45, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.140203
  5. Sharmila, J.J., Angel, T.S.S., “Optimized machine learning model for alzheimer and epilepsy detection from eeg signals”, Automatika, 65(2): 597–608, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00051144.2023.2297481
  6. Yu, W.Y., Sun, T.H., Hsu, K.C., Wang, C.C., Chien, S.Y., Tsai, C.H., Yang, Y.W., “Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for alzheimer's disease classification using eeg signals and genetic information”, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 176: 108621, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108621
  7. Aghajani, H., Zahedi, E., Jalili, M., Keikhosravi, A., Vahdat, B.V., “Diagnosis of early alzheimer's disease based on eeg source localization and a standardized realistic head model”, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 17(6): 1039–1045, (2013). DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2013.2253326
  8. Fiscon, G., Weitschek, E., De Cola, M.C., Felici, G., Bertolazzi, P., “An integrated approach based on eeg signals processing combined with supervised methods to classify alzheimer’s disease patients”, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Madrid, Spain, 2750–2752, (2018). DOI: 10.1109/BIBM.2018.8621473
  9. Miltiadous, A., Tzimourta, K. D., Giannakeas, N., Tsipouras, M. G., Afrantou, T., Ioannidis, P., Tzallas, A. T., “Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia: a robust classification method of eeg signals and a comparison of validation methods”, Diagnostics, 11, 8, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081437
  10. Aslan, Z., “EEG sinyallerini kullanarak alzheimer hastalığının otomatik tespiti için bilgisayar destekli tanı sistemi”, DÜMF Mühendislik Dergisi (DÜMF MD), 13(2): 213–220, (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.1092569
  11. Nedeljković, M., Pađin, P., Nikolić, S., “Low dimensional eeg classification for alzheimer’s disease recognition”, 2023 31st Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), Belgrade, Serbia, 1–4, (2023). DOI: 10.1109/TELFOR59449.2023.10372658
  12. Zheng, X., Wang, B., Liu, H., Wu, W., Sun, J., Fang, W., Jiang, R., Hu, Y., Jin, C., Wei, X., Chen, S.S.C., “Diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease via resting-state eeg: integration of spectrum, complexity, and synchronization signal features”, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 15, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1288295
  13. Hasan, W., Khan, S., Sohrabpour, A., “Classifying alzheimer’s disease and dementia patients using non-invasive eeg biomarkers”, medRxiv, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.24314841
  14. Ma, Y., Bland, J.K.S., Fujinami, T., “Classification of alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using electroencephalography to quantify communication between electrode pairs”, Diagnostics, 14(19): 2189, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192189
  15. Rostamikia, M., Sarbaz, Y., Makouei, S., “EEG-based classification of alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia: a comprehensive analysis of discriminative features”, Cognitive Neurodynamics, 18: 3447–3462, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10152-7
  16. Lal, U., Chikkankod, A.V., Longo, L., “A comparative study on feature extraction techniques for the discrimination of frontotemporal dementia and alzheimer’s disease with electroencephalography in resting-state adults”, Brain Sciences, 14(3), (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14040335
  17. OpenNeuro, “ds004504”, (Access date: 09.11.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds004504.v1.0.8
  18. Miltiadous, A., Tzimourta, K.D., Afrantou, T., Ioannidis, P., Grigoriadis, N., Tsalikakis, D.G., Angelidis, P., Tsipouras, M.G., Glavas, E., Giannakeas, N., Tzallas, A.T., “A dataset of scalp eeg recordings of alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia and healthy subjects from routine eeg”, Data, 8(6): 95, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/data8060095
  19. Arslan, R.U., Yapıcı, İ.Ş., “Farklı örnekleme tekniklerine ve farklı sınıflandırıcılara dayanarak kalp yetmezliği tanılı hastaların sağkalımlarının incelenmesi”, EMO Bilimsel Dergi, 14(2): 35–47, (2024). Erişim: https://izlik.org/JA44HL59GR
  20. Erkaymaz, O., Yapici, I.S., Arslan, R.U., “Effects of obesity on time-frequency components of electroretinogram signal using continuous wavelet transform”, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 66, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102398
  21. Alpaydın, E., Introduction to Machine Learning, MIT press, (2020).
  22. Yaganoglu, M., Bozkurt, F., Günay, F., “EEG tabanlı beyin-bilgisayar arayüzü sistemlerinde öznitelik çıkarma yöntemleri”, Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 2(3): 313–318, (2014). Erişim: https://izlik.org/JA95BS92DE
  23. Ma, Y., Zhan, K., Wang, Z., “Feature extraction”, in Applications of Pulse-Coupled Neural Networks, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 111–145, (2010).
  24. Omar, S., Tepe, C., “EEG işareti tabanlı anksiyete sınıflandırması için dalgacık dönüşümü ile öznitelik çıkarma”, Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1230092
  25. Kim, T.H., White, H., “On more robust estimation of skewness and kurtosis”, Finance Research Letters, 1(1): 56–73, (2004). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1544-6123(03)00003-5
  26. Groeneveld, R.A., Meeden, G., “Measuring skewness and kurtosis”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D: The Statistician, 33(4): 391–399, (1984). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2987742
  27. Allen, J., “Short term spectral analysis, synthesis, and modification by discrete fourier transform”, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 25(3): 235–238, (1977). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1977.1162950
  28. Goel, V., Brambrink, A.M., Baykal, A., Koehler, R.C., Hanley, D.F., Thakor, N.V., “Dominant frequency analysis of eeg reveals brain's response during injury and recovery”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 43(11): 1083–1092, (1996). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/10.541250
  29. Kahlbrock, N., Weisz, N., “Transient reduction of tinnitus intensity is marked by concomitant reductions of delta band power”, BMC Biology, 6: 4, (2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-4
  30. Puma, S., Matton, N., Paubel, P.-V., Raufaste, É., El-Yagoubi, R., “Using theta and alpha band power to assess cognitive workload in multitasking environments”, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 123: 111–120, (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.10.004
  31. Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M., Russegger, H., Pachinger, T., Schwaiger, J., “Induced alpha band power changes in the human eeg and attention”, Neuroscience Letters, 244(2): 73–76, (1998). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00122-0
  32. Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M., Wimmer, H., Gruber, W., Röhm, D., Schwaiger, J., Hutzler, F., “Alpha and beta band power changes in normal and dyslexic children”, Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(7): 1186–1195, (2001). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00543-0
  33. Thomas, K.P., Vinod, A.P., “EEG-based biometric authentication using gamma band power during rest state”, Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 37: 277–289, (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-017-0551-4
  34. Zhang, A., Yang, B., Huang, L., “Feature extraction of eeg signals using power spectral entropy”, 2008 International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics, Sanya, China, 435–439, (2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEI.2008.254
  35. Dalwadi, G., Krishnan, N., Shah, B., Shah, H., “Efficient crest factor reduction techniques for 5G nr: a review and a case study”, Wireless Personal Communications, 132: 1137–1175, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10651-6
  36. Wijayanto, I., Humairani, A., Hadiyoso, S., Rizal, A., Prasanna, D.L., Tripathi, S.L., “Epileptic seizure detection on a compressed eeg signal using energy measurement”, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 85: 104872, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104872
  37. Yahyaei, R., Özkurt, T.E., “Mean curve length: an efficient feature for brainwave biometrics”, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 76: 103664, (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103664
  38. Aydin, S., Saraoğlu, H., Kara, S., “Log energy entropy-based eeg classification with multilayer neural networks in seizure”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 37: 2626–2630, (2009). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9795-x
  39. Polat, H., “Permütasyon entropi tabanlı karmaşıklık analizi ile eeg işaretlerinden şizofreni tespiti”, Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 12(4): 2085–2096, (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1122315
  40. Yapıcı, İ.Ş., Arslan, R.U., Erkaymaz, O., “Kalp yetmezliği tanılı hastaların hayatta kalma tahmininde topluluk makine öğrenme yöntemlerinin performans analizi”, Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 14(1): 59–69, (2024) DOI: https://doi.org/10.7212/karaelmasfen.1429458
  41. Yılmaz, A., Sümer, E., “Relief özellik seçim yöntem tabanlı önerilen hibrit model ile kalp hastalığı teşhisi”, Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 31: 609–615, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1017054
  42. Karakoyun, M., Hacıbeyoğlu, M., “Biyomedikal veri kümeleri ile makine öğrenmesi sınıflandırma algoritmalarının istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırılması”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 16(48): 30–42, (2014). Erişim: https://izlik.org/JA56AH52LX
  43. Şeker, D., Özerdem, M.S., “A classification approach for focal/non-focal eeg detection using cepstral analysis”, Düzce Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi (DUJE), 12(4): 603–613, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.1002081
  44. Taşcı, E., Onan, A., “K-en yakın komşu algoritması parametrelerinin sınıflandırma performansı üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi”, Akademik Bilişim, 1(1): 4–18, (2016).
  45. Huggins, C.J., Escudero, J., Parra, M.A., Scally, B., Anghinah, R., De Araújo, A.V.L., Abasolo, D., “Deep learning of resting-state electroencephalogram signals for three-class classification of alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment and healthy ageing”, Journal of Neural Engineering, 18(4), (2021). DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac05d8
  46. Puri, D.V., Nalbalwar, S.L., Nandgaonkar, A.B., Gawande, J.P., Wagh, A., “Automatic detection of alzheimer’s disease from eeg signals using low-complexity orthogonal wavelet filter banks”, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 81, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104439
  47. Jain, U., Nathani, K., Ruban, N., Joseph Raj, A.N., Zhuang, Z., Mahesh, V.G.V., “Cubic svm classifier based feature extraction and emotion detection from speech signals”, 2018 International Conference on Sensor Networks and Signal Processing (SNSP), 386–391, (2018). DOI: 10.1109/SNSP.2018.00081
  48. Arslan, R.U., Yapıcı, İ.Ş., Erkaymaz, O., “Diyabet risk durumunun belirlenmesinde sınıflandırma algoritmalarının performanslarının kapsamlı bir şekilde karşılaştırılması”, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(4): 1320–1333, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.1465177
  49. Mootoo, X.S., Fours, A., Dinesh, C., Ashkani, M., Kiss, A., Faltyn, M., “Detecting alzheimer’s disease in eeg data with machine learning and the graph discrete fourier transform”, medRxiv, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.01.23297940
  50. Mohammed, A.N., “Detecting cognitive decline in alzheimer's disease using brain signals: an eeg based classification approach”, 2024 IEEE 4th International Maghreb Meeting of the Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (MI-STA), 613–618, (2024). DOI: 10.1109/MI-STA61267.2024.10599651