Journals / BELLETEN / 2000 / Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 241

The Northward Expansion of the Kingdom of Urartu and the Historical Geography of the Land of Qulha

Urartu Krallığı'nın Kuzey Yayılımı ve Qulha Ülkesinin Tarihi Coğrafyası

Journal
BELLETEN
Pages
717–748
Publication Date
2000-12-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this light, the only piece of evidence for the hypothesized connection between the kingdom of Urartu and the Lower Çoruh valley and Colchis on the coast of the Black Sea may be seen to have vanished.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The desire to control the regions north of Lake Van by the kingdom of Urartu became apparent during its foundation period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the continuation of their campaigns under the reign of Minua, the native Diauehe Kingdom in the Erzurum area was compelled to pay tribute and the land of Erequa in the environs of Iğdır was incorporated into the Urartian kingdom.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this light, the only piece of evidence for the hypothesized connection between the kingdom of Urartu and the Lower Çoruh valley and Colchis on the coast of the Black Sea may be seen to have vanished.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kingdom of Urartu · Land of Qulha · Historical Geography

Abstract

The desire to control the regions north of Lake Van by the kingdom of Urartu became apparent during its foundation period. Inscriptions related to the ninth century B.C indicate that, following their campaigns waged against tribes called Witeru(he), Lusha and Katarza, the armies of the Urartu expanded as far as the Araxes valley. With the continuation of their campaigns under the reign of Minua, the native Diauehe Kingdom in the Erzurum area was compelled to pay tribute and the land of Erequa in the environs of Iğdır was incorporated into the Urartian kingdom. Under Argişti I, the Urartian armies marched to their furthest possible extent, to regions like Hanak (Ortakent) and Kanlıca where their one-time presence is attested by elaborate inscriptions. Generally speaking, the outline of the northern policy adopted by Argişti I was continued by the Urartian kingdom during the reign of Sarduri II and, in consequence, pressure was increased on areas like Diaueli, Iga(ne), Abiliane, Etiune and Eriahe, to the north and northeast of the Araxes valley. Added to the list of domains raided in this period was the land of Qulha-which entity has been identified, up to the present, with Colchis. Taking the extant inscriptions that contain only the names of places raided and what constituted the booty obtained as witnesses of the campaigns directed against the regions north of the Araxes River, we may state that the expansion of the borders of the kingdom of Urartu reached to the north of Ardahan and even as far as the ancient Colchis region. But the remains of material culture left by the Urartian polity in the highlands of Ardahan in the Kars area are very scanty (with the exception of the inscriptions). In the Lower Çoruh valley, no evidence has been encountered of the kingdom of Urartu. So far as can be determined, the Urartians in the eighth century attempted to control the area as far as the sources of the Kura River by means of raiding campaigns in order to meet a portion of their needs for cattle and small livestock, like sheep and goats, in addition to horses and other sources of power. The mountain range of Yalnızçam that edges Ardahan to the northwest and west appears to have formed the limits of both the raiding campaigns of the Urartians and any traces of their culture. Based on the distribution of the archeological finds and a comparison of the statements in the inscriptions of the kinds of booty that were captured and of the descriptions of the topography, we may conclude that the name "Göle," a referent in the local vernacular for the area south of Ardahan, represents the ancient "Kola," that is, the land of Qulha. In this light, the only piece of evidence for the hypothesized connection between the kingdom of Urartu and the Lower Çoruh valley and Colchis on the coast of the Black Sea may be seen to have vanished.

Özet

Doğu Anadolu, Transkafkasya ve Kuzeybatı İran dahil olmak üzere geniş bir alana yayılmış olan Urartu kalıntıları, bazı coğrafi birimlerde daha yoğun olarak karşımıza çıkmakta, bazı bölgelerde ise daha az çağdaş malzeme ile temsil edilmektedir. Sınır bölgeleri bir yana bırakılırsa, merkezi Van bölgesi ile Urartu yapılaşmasının çok sayıda merkez ile temsil edildiği batıda Elazığ, güneydoğuda Urmiye Gölü ve kuzeydoğuda da Sevan Gölü arasında kalan alanlarda bile önemli boşlukların bulunduğu görülmektedir. Aynı durumun Van Gölü havzasının kuzey ve kuzeybatısında yer alan Ağrı ve Erzurum için de geçerli olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖROĞLU, K. (2000). The Northward Expansion of the Kingdom of Urartu and the Historical Geography of the Land of Qulha. BELLETEN, Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 241, 717–748. https://ajindex.com/articles/126815

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Apollonius Rhodius, The Argonautica (with an English translation by R. C. Seaton) Loeb Classical Library, London 1921. ARAB I: D. D. Luckenbil, Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia I, Chicago 1926.
  2. Atalay, İ. (1994),
  3. Türkiye Vejetasyon Coğrafyası, Vegetation Geography of Turkey, Izmir. Atalay, İ. (1997),
  4. Türkiye Coğrafyası, İzmir.
  5. Atalay, İ.- M. Tetik,- Ö. Yılmaz, (1985),
  6. Kuzeydoğu Anadolu'nun Ekosistemleri, The Ecosystem of North-Eastern Anatolia, Ankara.
  7. Aydın, N. (1991), "Güzelhisar Urartu Kitabesi", Belleten 213, s. 323-329.
  8. Azarpay, G. (1968),
  9. Urartian Ait and Artifacts, A Chronological Studies, London. Badaljan, R. S.- C. Edens vd. (1992), “Archaeological Investigations at Horom in the Shirak Plain of Northwestern Armenia, 1990”, Iran XXX, s. 31-48.
  10. Badaljan, R. S.- C. Edens vd. (1993), "Preliminary Report on the 1992
  11. Excavations at Horom, Armenia", Iran XXXI, s. 1-24.
  12. Balkan, K. (1960), "Patnos Yakınlarında Anzavurtepe'de Bulunan Urartu Tapınağı ve Kitabeleri", Anatolia 5, s. 133-158.
  13. Balkan, K.- O. Sümer (1965), "1965 Yılı Ani Kazıları Hakkında Kısa Rapor", Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi 14, s. 103-118.
  14. Barnet, R. D. (1956), "Ancient Oriental Influences on Archaic Greece", The Aegean and the Near East: Studies Presented to Hetty Goldman on the Occasion of her Seventy-fifth Birthday (ed. S.S. Weinberg), New York, s. 212-238.
  15. Barnett, R. D. (1963), "The Urartian Cemetery at İğdır", Anatolian Studies XIII, s. 153-198.
  16. Barnett, R. D. (1982), "Urartu", Cambridge Ancient History 3/2, s. 314-371.
  17. Başgelen, N. (1985), “Doğu Anadolu’dan Demir Çağı’na Ait Bazı Yeni Bulgular I: Kitabeler-Kaya Tünelleri”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 28-31, s. 15-18.
  18. Başgelen, N. (1986), “Doğu Anadolu’dan Demir Çağı’na Ait Bazı Yeni Bulgular II: Kitabeler-Kaya Tünelleri”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 32-33, s. 25-30.
  19. Başgelen, N. (1986b), “Çelikli Kaya Mezarı Üzerine Gözlemler”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 34-35, s. 21-24.
  20. Başgelen, N. (1987), “Erzurum ve Pasinler Çevresinden Yeni Bulgular”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 38-39, s. 16-19.
  21. Başgelen, N. (1988), “Kars ve Ağrı İllerinden Bazı Kaleler Hakkında Gözlemler”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 40-41, s. 14-17.
  22. Başgelen, N. (1989), “Umudumtepe Kaya Mezarı”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 42-45, s. 22-25.
  23. Başgelen, N. (1992), “Marifet Kaya Mezarı”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 54-55, s. 31- 32. Başgelen, N. (1997), “Hasanova- Erzurum Kaya Mezarları”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 78, s. 28-31.
  24. Başgelen, N. - A. Özfırat (1996), “Erzurum’da bir Demir Çağı Merkezi”, Anadolu Araştırmaları XIV, s. 143-159.
  25. Belli, O. (