SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1

FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN WITH STATE FEEDBACK

DURUM GERİBESLEMELİ UÇUŞ KONTROL SİSTEM TASARIMI

Emre Kıyak
Pages
409–425
Publication Date
2009-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the design, having the target of improving the quality of the longitudinal and lateral flight, is realized by state feedback control with the assumption that all of the states can be directly measured.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:State feedback control is based on the fact that the system poles of a certain closed loop system can be obtained from the constant gain feedback matrix.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, the controlled variable can be kept at the preferred value.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the design, having the target of improving the quality of the longitudinal and lateral flight, is realized by state feedback control with the assumption that all of the states can be directly measured.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uçuş kontrol sistemi · Kararlılık artırımı · Durum geribeslemeli kontrol

Abstract

State feedback control is based on the fact that the system poles of a certain closed loop system can be obtained from the constant gain feedback matrix. Thus, the controlled variable can be kept at the preferred value. This kind of control can be used in case of the disadvantages of the traditional controllers such as P, PI, PD, and PID. In this study, the design, having the target of improving the quality of the longitudinal and lateral flight, is realized by state feedback control with the assumption that all of the states can be directly measured.

Özet

Durum geribeslemeli kontrol, belirli bir kapalı döngü sistem kutuplarının sabit kazançlı bir geribesleme matrisi ile elde edilebilmesine dayanır. Bu sayede denetlenen değişken arzu edilen değerde tutulabilir. Kontrol sistem tasarımlarında kullanılan geleneksel denetleyicilerden P, PI, PD ve PID tip denetleyicilerin dezavantajlı olması halinde bu tip denetim kullanılabilir. Bu çalışmada, bir uçağın uzunlamasına ve yanlamasına uçuş kalitesinin arttırılması amacıyla tüm durumların doğrudan ölçülebildiği varsayılarak durum geribeslemeli kontrol ile tasarım gerçekleştirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kıyak, E. (2009). FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN WITH STATE FEEDBACK. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 409–425. https://ajindex.com/articles/1267288

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Kuo B.C., Otomatik Kontrol Sistemleri, Literatür Yayınları, 2002.
  2. Yüksel İ., Otomatik Kontrol Sistem Dinamiği ve Denetim Sistemleri, Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2001.
  3. Lin C.A., Gundes A.N., Multi-input Multi-output PI Controller Design, Proceedings of the 39. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, 2000.
  4. Ramirez H.S., Zribi M., Ahmad S., Dynamical Sliding Mode Control Approach for Vertical Flight Regulation in Helicopters, IEE Proceedings of the Control Theory Applications, 141, 1, 1994.
  5. Lee C.H., Chung M.J., Gain-Scheduled State Feedback Control Design Technique for Flight Vehicles, IEEE Transactions On Aerospace And Electronic Systems, 37, 1, 2001.
  6. Yang G.H., Lum K.Y., Gain-Scheduled Flight Control via State Feedback, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver Colorado, 2003.
  7. Legowo A., Okubo H., Robust Flight Control Design for a Turn Coordination System with Parameter Uncertainties, American Journal of Applied Sciences 4 (7), 496-501, 2007.
  8. Srinathkumar S., Eigenstructure Control: A Flight Vehicle Handling Qualities Design Tool, Proceedings of the International Conference on Aerospace Science and Technology, Bangalore, India 2008.
  9. Nelson R.C., Flight Stability And Automatic Control, McGraw-Hill, 1998.
  10. Mclean D., Automatic Flight Control Systems, Prentice-Hall, 1990.
  11. Hajiyev C., Çalışkan F., Fault Diagnosis And Reconfiguration In Flight Control Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, United Kingdom, 2003.
  12. http://slonder.tripod.com/kumanda/kumanda.htm