SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 30 Sayı: 5

Supplier selection based on multi-criteria decision making approaches: an ımplementation in electronics sector

Çok ölçütlü karar verme yaklaşımlarına dayalı tedarikçi seçimi: elektronik sektöründe bir uygulama

Murat Arıkan
Berat Gökbek
Pages
346–354
Publication Date
2014-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Key Words: Supply chain management, Supplier Selection, Analytic Hierarchy Process, TOPSIS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Supplier selection which is an important part of the supply chain management, is a multi-stage and difficult decision problem requiring the consideration of multiple factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, an approach that integrates Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with TOPSIS, is used to solve the supplier selection problem of an electronics company.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Key Words: Supply chain management, Supplier Selection, Analytic Hierarchy Process, TOPSIS.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi · Tedarikçi Seçimi · Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi

Abstract

Supplier selection which is an important part of the supply chain management, is a multi-stage and difficult decision problem requiring the consideration of multiple factors. In this study, an approach that integrates Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with TOPSIS, is used to solve the supplier selection problem of an electronics company. The input set of criteria for these techniques is determined by statistical analysis while criteria weights are identified via AHP calculations. Alternative suppliers are put in order by using TOPSIS method to select the best one and sensitivity analysis is performed. Key Words: Supply chain management, Supplier Selection, Analytic Hierarchy Process, TOPSIS.

Özet

Tedarik zinciri yönetiminin önemli bir halkasını oluşturan tedarikçi seçimi, bir çok faktörü gözönüne almayı gerektiren çok aşamalı ve zor bir karar problemidir. Bu çalışmada, bir elektronik firmasının en iyi tedarikçiyi seçme probleminin çözümü için çok ölçütlü karar verme tekniklerinden AHP (Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi)’nin, TOPSIS ile entegre edildiği bir yaklaşım kullanılmıştır. Bu yöntemler için kullanılan performans kriterleri istatiksel analizler, kriter ağırlıkları ise AHP yöntemi kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. TOPSIS yöntemi ile alternatifler sıralanarak en iyi tedarikçi seçilmiş ve duyarlılık analizi yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arıkan, M., Gökbek, B. (2014). Supplier selection based on multi-criteria decision making approaches: an ımplementation in electronics sector. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 5, 346–354. https://ajindex.com/articles/1267053

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Chai, J., Liu, J.N.K., Ngai, E.W.T., Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature, Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872–3885, 2013.
  2. Zeydan, M., Çolpan, C., Çobanoğlu, C., A combined Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K., Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24, 2010.
  3. Razali, N. M., Wah, Y.B., Power comparisons of Shapiro- De Boer, L., Labro, E., Morlacchi, P., A review of methods supporting supplier selection, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(2), 75–89, 2001.
  4. Tam M.C.Y., Tummala V.M.R., An Application of the AHP in Vendor Selection of a Telecommunications System, OMEGA, 29(2), 171-182, 2001.
  5. Levary, R.R., Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Rank Foreign Suppliers Based on Supply Risks, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(2), 535-542, Yaralıoğlu, K., Performans Değerlendirmede Analitik Yurdakul, M., İç Y.T., Analysis of the benefit generated by using fuzzy numbers in a TOPSIS model developed for machine tool selection problems, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(1), 310-317, 2009.
  6. Almeida, A.T., Multicriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and ELECTRE method, Computers & Operations Research, 34(12), 3569-, 2007.
  7. Sevkli, M., An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection, International Journal of Production Research, 48(12), 3393–3405, 2010.
  8. Dulmin, R., Mininno, V., Supplier selection using a multi- criteria decision aid method, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 9(4), 177–187, 2003. the fuzzy PROMETHEE for IS outsourcing,Expert Systems with Applications 38(10), 13216–13222, 2011. augmented DEA approach, International Journal of
  9. Production Research, 47(16), 4593–4608, 2009. supplier selection problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 186(3), 1059–1067, 2008. approach for a supplier selection problem in supply chain management, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), –9228, 2009. supply chain configuration and supplier selection: Multi- objective approach,Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), –6791, 2012. for green supply chain optimisation under activity-based costing and performance evaluation with a value-chain structure, International Journal of Production Research, (18), 4991–5017, 2009.
  10. Arıkan, F., Küçükçe, Y.S., Satın Alma Faaliyeti İçin Bir Tedarikçi Seçimi-Değerlendirme Problemi ve Çözümü, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), 264, 2012.
  11. Corrente, S., Greco, S., Slowinski, R., Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE, OMEGA, 41(5), 820-846, 2013.
  12. Kull, T.J., Talluri, S., A Supply Risk Reduction Model Using Integrated Multicriteria Decision Making, IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 55(3), 409-419, 2008. methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation,Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2741–, 2011.
  13. Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson- Darling tests, Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, (1), 21-33, 2011.
  14. Ercan, İ., Kan, İ., Ölçeklerde Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlik, Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3), 211-216, Saaty, T. L., A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-, 1977.
  15. Hiyerarşi Prosesi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, (1), 129-142, 2001.
  16. Triantaphyllou, E., Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2000.
  17. Almeida, A.T., Multicriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and ELECTRE method, Computers & Operations Research, 34(12), 3569-, 2007.
  18. Kull, T.J., Talluri, S., A Supply Risk Reduction Model Using Integrated Multicriteria Decision Making, IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 55(3), 409-419, 2008. methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation,Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2741–, 2011.
  19. Ercan, İ., Kan, İ., Ölçeklerde Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlik, Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3), 211-216, Saaty, T. L., A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-, 1977.