SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 41 Sayı: 1

Jeotermal Enerji ve Kalina Çevrim Tabanlı Entegre Sistemde Yeşil Hidrojen ve Amonyak, Tatlı Su ve Sıcak Su Üretiminin İncelenmesi

Sadık Ata(KTO KARATAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6791-593X
Pages
190–206
Publication Date
2025-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Parametrik analiz sonuçları multi-üretim sistemlerinin performanslarıyla ilgili çıkarım yapılması noktasında enerji ve ekserji analizinin yanı sıra ekonomik ve çevresel analizlerinin de yapılması gerektiğini göstermiştir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bu çalışmada jeotermal enerji ve Kalina çevrim tabanlı multi-üretim sisteminin enerji, ekserji, ekonomik ve çevresel performansı analiz edilmiştir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Jeotermal kaynak giriş sıcaklığı, jeotermal kaynak çıkış sıcaklığı, Kalina türbin giriş basıncı, Kalina soğuk su giriş sıcaklığı, jeotermal kaynak debisi ve Kalina türbin izantropik veriminin sistem performansı üstündeki etkisi tespit edilmiştir.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Parametrik analiz sonuçları multi-üretim sistemlerinin performanslarıyla ilgili çıkarım yapılması noktasında enerji ve ekserji analizinin yanı sıra ekonomik ve çevresel analizlerinin de yapılması gerektiğini göstermiştir.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeşil Hidrojen · Yeşil Amonyak · Karbon Kazanımı

Özet

Bu çalışmada jeotermal enerji ve Kalina çevrim tabanlı multi-üretim sisteminin enerji, ekserji, ekonomik ve çevresel performansı analiz edilmiştir. Kalina, sıcak su üretim ünitesi, proton değişim membran elektrolizör, amonyak reaktörü ve ters ozmoz ünitesinden oluşan entegre sistem ele alınmıştır. Bu kapsamda hidrojen, amonyak, tatlı su ve sıcak su üretimleri incelenmiştir. Jeotermal kaynak giriş sıcaklığı, jeotermal kaynak çıkış sıcaklığı, Kalina türbin giriş basıncı, Kalina soğuk su giriş sıcaklığı, jeotermal kaynak debisi ve Kalina türbin izantropik veriminin sistem performansı üstündeki etkisi tespit edilmiştir. Ekonomik analiz olarak paranın zaman değerini ortaya koyan dinamik geri ödeme süresi ve net bugünkü değer incelenmiştir. Çevresel analizde ise net sıfır emisyon hedefleri doğrultusunda tamamen yenilebilir enerjiden üretilen yeşil hidrojen ve yeşil amonyağın geleneksel yöntemlerle üretilmelerine kıyasla kurtardığı karbon dioksit ve buna bağlı olarak kazanılan karbon tutarı incelenmiştir. Parametrik analiz sonuçları multi-üretim sistemlerinin performanslarıyla ilgili çıkarım yapılması noktasında enerji ve ekserji analizinin yanı sıra ekonomik ve çevresel analizlerinin de yapılması gerektiğini göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ata, S. (2025). Jeotermal Enerji ve Kalina Çevrim Tabanlı Entegre Sistemde Yeşil Hidrojen ve Amonyak, Tatlı Su ve Sıcak Su Üretiminin İncelenmesi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 1, 190–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/1266688

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. Bergougui, B. 2024. Moving toward environmental mitigation in Algeria: Asymmetric impact of fossil fuel energy, renewable energy and technological innovation on CO2 emissions. Energy Strategy Reviews, 51, 101281.
  2. Bashir, M.F., Shahbaz, M., Ma, B., Alam, K. 2024. Evaluating the roles of energy innovation, fossil fuel costs and environmental compliance towards energy transition in advanced industrial economies. J Environ Manage, 351, 119709.
  3. Rahman, A., Murad, S.M.W., Mohsin, A.K.M., Wang, X. 2024. Does renewable energy proactively contribute to mitigating carbon emissions in major fossil fuels consuming countries? J Clean Prod, 452, 142113.
  4. Idroes, G.M., Afjal, M., Khan, M., Haseeb, M., Hardi, I., Noviandy, T.R., et al. 2024. Exploring the role of geothermal energy consumption in achieving carbon neutrality and environmental sustainability. Heliyon, 10, e40709.
  5. Goswami, S., Rai, A.K. 2024. An assessment of prospects of geothermal energy in India for energy sustanability. Renew Energy, 233, 121118.
  6. Guler, O.F., Sen, O., Yilmaz, C., Kanoglu, M. 2022. Performance evaluation of a geothermal and solar-based multigeneration system and comparison with alternative case studies: Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic aspects. Renew Energy, 200, 1517–32.
  7. Ebrahimi, A., Ghorbani, B., Ziabasharhagh, M. 2022. Exergy and economic analyses of an innovative integrated system for cogeneration of treated biogas and liquid carbon dioxide using absorption–compression refrigeration system and ORC/Kalina power cycles through geothermal energy. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,158, 257–81.
  8. Akimoto, R., Yamaki, T., Nakaiwa, M., Matsuda, K. 2021. Applicability study of micro Kalina cycle for regional low grade geothermal heat in Japan. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 28, 101506.
  9. Kolasinski, P. 2019. Application of the multi-vane expanders in orc systems - A review on the experimental and modeling research activities. Energies (Basel), 12, 2975.
  10. Chew, J.M., Reddy, C.C.S., Rangaiah, G.P. 2014. Improving energy efficiency of dividing-wall columns using heat pumps, Organic Rankine Cycle and Kalina Cycle. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 76, 45–59.
  11. Wang, Z., Zhou, H., Yuan, Q., Wang, Q., Shao, H., Dai, Z., et al. 2023. Optimization design and analysis of a novel total flow and Kalina cycle coupled system driven on low-medium temperature geothermal source with two-phase mixture. Appl Therm Eng, 221, 119807.
  12. Yari, M., Mehr, A.S., Zare, V., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Rosen, M.A. 2015. Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source. Energy, 83, 712–22.
  13. Dong, Z.Y., Yang, J., Yu, L., Daiyan, R., Amal, R. 2022. A green hydrogen credit framework for international green hydrogen trading towards a carbon neutral future. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 47, 728–34.
  14. Mahmoud, M., Ramadan, M., Naher, S., Pullen, K., Ali Abdelkareem, M., Olabi, A.G. 2021. A review of geothermal energy-driven hydrogen production systems. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 22, 100854.
  15. Shah, M., Prajapati, M., Yadav, K., Sircar, A. 2022. A review of the geothermal integrated hydrogen production system as a sustainable way of solving potential fuel shortages. J Clean Prod, 380, 135001.
  16. Mohebali Nejadian, M., Ahmadi, P., Houshfar, E. 2023. Comparative optimization study of three novel integrated hydrogen production systems with SOEC, PEM, and alkaline electrolyzer. Fuel, 336, 126835.
  17. Juangsa, F.B., Irhamna, A.R., Aziz, M. 2021. Production of ammonia as potential hydrogen carrier: Review on thermochemical and electrochemical processes. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, 14455–77.
  18. Cha, J., Park, Y., Brigljević, B., Lee, B., Lim, D., Lee, T., et al. 2021. An efficient process for sustainable and scalable hydrogen production from green ammonia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152, 111562.
  19. Ozturk, M., Dincer, I. 2021. An integrated system for ammonia production from renewable hydrogen: A case study. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, 5918–25.
  20. Kojima, Y., Yamaguchi, M. 2022. Ammonia as a hydrogen energy carrier. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 47, 22832–9.
  21. Ramazanian, S., Aliehyaei, M., Salimi, M., Najafizadeh, M.M. 2023. Theoretical and experimental investigation of reverse osmosis (RO) desalination solar system using the solar panel, battery, and water turbine for high-pressure recovery of output brine. Solar Energy, 262, 111852.
  22. Hai, T., El-Shafay, A.S., Alizadeh, A., Singh Chauhan, B., Fahad Almojil, S., Ibrahim Almohana, A., et al. 2023. Combination of a geothermal-driven double-flash cycle and a Kalina cycle to devise a polygeneration system: Environmental assessment and optimization. Appl Therm Eng, 228, 120437.
  23. Yuksel, Y.E, Ozturk, M., Dincer, I. 2021. Evaluation of a new geothermal based multigenerational plant with primary outputs of hydrogen and ammonia. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, 16344–59.
  24. Sun, W., Feng, L., Abed, A.M., Sharma, A., Arsalanloo, A. 2022. Thermoeconomic assessment of a renewable hybrid RO/PEM electrolyzer integrated with Kalina cycle and solar dryer unit using response surface methodology (RSM). Energy, 260, 124947.
  25. Malik, M.Z., Musharavati, F., Khanmohammadi, S., Pakseresht, A.H., Khanmohammadi, S., Nguyen, D.D. 2020. Design and comparative exergy and exergo-economic analyses of a novel integrated Kalina cycle improved with fuel cell and thermoelectric module. Energy Convers Manag, 220, 113081.
  26. Alirahmi, S.M., Assareh, E., Pourghassab, N.N., Delpisheh, M., Barelli, L., Baldinelli, A. 2022. Green hydrogen & electricity production via geothermal-driven multi-generation system: Thermodynamic modeling and optimization. Fuel, 308, 122049.
  27. Akkurt, F. 2020. Düşük Sıcaklıkta Jeotermal Enerji Kaynaklı Organik Rankine Çevrimi Sisteminin Enerji Ve Ekserji Analizi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 729-742.
  28. Koç, Y., Yağlı, H. 2020. Isı-Güç Kombine Sistemlerinde Kullanılan Kalina Çevriminin Enerji ve Ekserji Analizi. Politeknik Dergisi, 23(1), 181-188.
  29. Kara, O., Kaşka, Ö. 2023. Bir Kalina Çevriminin Termodinamik ve Ekonomik Açıdan Değerlendirilmesi. Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(3), 1153-1168.
  30. Sen, O., Yılmaz, C. 2022. Jeotermal ve güneş destekli güç üretimi ve ısıtma sisteminin termodinamik analizi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(3), 1625-1638.
  31. Hançer Güleryüz, E., Özen, D. N. 2024. Jeotermal Temelli bir Organik Rankine Çevriminin Eksergo-ekonomik Analizi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 312-335.
  32. Koc, M., Yuksel, Y.E., Ozturk, M. 2022. Thermodynamic and exergo-economic assessments of a new geothermally driven multigeneration plant. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 47, 19463–80.
  33. Ebrahimi-Moghadam, A., Farzaneh-Gord, M., Jabari Moghadam, A., Abu-Hamdeh, N.H., Lasemi, M.A., Arabkoohsar, A., et al. 2021. Design and multi-criteria optimisation of a trigeneration district energy system based on gas turbine, Kalina, and ejector cycles: Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental evaluation. Energy Convers Manag, 227, 113581.
  34. Yuksel, Y.E., Ozturk, M., Dincer, I. 2021. Development and assessment of a novel geothermal power-based multigenerational system with hydrogen and ammonia production options. Energy Convers Manag, 243, 114365.
  35. Salari, A., Hakkaki-Fard, A. 2022. Thermodynamic analysis of a photovoltaic thermal system coupled with an organic Rankine cycle and a proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 47:17894–913.
  36. Nafey, A.S., Sharaf, M.A. 2010. Combined solar organic Rankine cycle with reverse osmosis desalination process: Energy, exergy, and cost evaluations. Renew Energy, 35, 2571–80.
  37. Çengel, Y.A., Boles, M.A. 2008. Thermodynamics: An engineering approach 6th Editon (SI Units). New York.: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
  38. Dinçer, I., Rosen, M.A. 2007. Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier.
  39. Fallah, M., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Yari, M., Akbarpour Ghiasi, R. 2016. Advanced exergy analysis of the Kalina cycle applied for low temperature enhanced geothermal system. Energy Convers Manag, 108, 190–201.
  40. Yilmaz, F., Ozturk, M. 2022. Thermodynamic and economic investigation of an innovative multigeneration plant integrated with the solar collector and combustion chamber. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 47, 31786–805.
  41. Yuksel, Y.E., Ozturk, M., Dincer, I. 2021. Development of a novel combined energy plant for multigeneration with hydrogen and ammonia production. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, 28980–94.
  42. Hai, T., Chaturvedi, R., Almujibah, H., Marjan, R.K., Van Thuong, T., Soliman, N., et al. 2024. Integrating geothermal energy and desalination unit into a poly-generation configuration: Comprehensive study and optimization. Desalination, 586, 117873.
  43. Gao, J., Wang, Z., Li, X., Zhou, X. 2024. Investigation of a novel scheme utilizing solar and geothermal energies, generating power and ammonia: Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses and cuckoo search optimization. Energy, 298, 131344.
  44. Tsatsaronis, G. 1999. Strengths and limitations of exergy analysis. In: Bejan, A., Mamut, E. (Eds.), Thermodynamic Optimization of Complex Energy Systems. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 93–100.
  45. Gilbert, A., Mesmer, B. 2016. Uses of Exergy in Systems Engineering, in: Proc. 2016 Conference on Systems Engineering Research.
  46. Dipippo R, Marcille DF. 1984. Exergy analysis of geothermal power plants. Geothermal Resources Council Trans. 8, 47–52.
  47. Shakibi, H., Faal, M.Y., Assareh, E., Agarwal, N., Yari, M., Latifi, S.A., et al. 2023. Design and multi-objective optimization of a multi-generation system based on PEM electrolyzer, RO unit, absorption cooling system, and ORC utilizing machine learning approaches; a case study of Australia. Energy, 278, 127796.
  48. González-Arias, J., Nawaz, M.A., Vidal-Barrero, F., Reina, T.R. 2024. A profitability study for catalytic ammonia production from renewable landfill biogas: Charting a route for the next generation of green ammonia. Fuel, 360, 130584.
  49. Javaherian, A., Ghasemzadeh, N., Javanshir, N., Yari, M., Vajdi, M., Nami, H. 2023. Techno-environmental assessment and machine learning-based optimization of a novel dual-source multi-generation energy system. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 176, 537–59.
  50. Zhu, Y., Li, W., Li, J., Li, H., Wang, Y., Li, S. 2020. Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of biomass-fired organic Rankine cycle combined heat and power system integrated with CO2 capture. Energy Convers Manag, 204, 112310.
  51. Zhu, Y., Zhang, C., Yan, M., Liu, Z., Li, W., Li, H., et al. 2024. Biomass-fired combined heat, cool and power system incorporating organic Rankine cycle and single-effect lithium bromide absorption refrigeration integrated with CO2 capture: Thermo-economic analysis. Energy, 304, 132096.
  52. Al Ghafri, S.Z., Revell, C., Di Lorenzo, M., Xiao, G., Buckley, C.E., May, E.F, et al. 2023. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of LNG export for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 48, 8343–69.
  53. Ghavam, S., Vahdati, M., Wilson, I.A.G., Styring, P. 2021. Sustainable Ammonia Production Processes. Front Energy Res, 9, 580808.
  54. Nasser, M., Hassan, H. 2023. Techno-enviro-economic analysis of hydrogen production via low and high temperature electrolyzers powered by PV/Wind turbines/Waste heat. Energy Convers Manag, 278, 116693.
  55. Ioroi, T., Yasuda, K., Siroma, Z., Fujiwara, N., Miyazaki, Y. 2002. Thin film electrocatalyst layer for unitized regenerative polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Power Sources, 112 (2):583–7.
  56. Siddiqui, O., Dincer, I. 2019. Design and analysis of a novel solar-wind based integrated energy system utilizing ammonia for energy storage. Energy Convers Manag, 195, 866–84.