Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 41 Sayı: 2

Determination of Transformation Efficiency of Different Local Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Genotypes

Farklı Yerel Patlıcan (Solanum melongena L.) Genotiplerinin Transformasyon Etkinliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Şerife Koç(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0006-4422-4999
Hasan Pinar(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
572–579
Publication Date
2025-08-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of this study imply that the transformation efficiency of eggplant genotypes grown in Turkey is contingent on the protocol and genotype, suggesting that the genetic composition of these genotypes significantly impacts transformation efficiency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: The objective of this study was to ascertain the transformation efficiency of diverse local aubergine genotypes cultivated extensively in Turkey.The study utilised seven distinct local aubergine genotypes (Yamula, Kemer, Topan, Pala, Aydın Black, Bilecik and Gaziantep) as plant material.Two distinct protocols (P1 and P2) were employed for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The outcomes of the study indicated that regeneration efficiency was 1% for the Yamula and Gaziantep genotypes in Protocol 1, while no regeneration was observed for the other genotypes.The highest regeneration efficiency was observed for the Gaziantep (13%) and Yamula (11%) genotypes, while the lowest was observed for the Aydın Siyahı genotype.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of this study imply that the transformation efficiency of eggplant genotypes grown in Turkey is contingent on the protocol and genotype, suggesting that the genetic composition of these genotypes significantly impacts transformation efficiency.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Patlıcan · Agrobacterium · Gen transferi

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this study was to ascertain the transformation efficiency of diverse local aubergine genotypes cultivated extensively in Turkey.The study utilised seven distinct local aubergine genotypes (Yamula, Kemer, Topan, Pala, Aydın Black, Bilecik and Gaziantep) as plant material.Two distinct protocols (P1 and P2) were employed for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The outcomes of the study indicated that regeneration efficiency was 1% for the Yamula and Gaziantep genotypes in Protocol 1, while no regeneration was observed for the other genotypes.The highest regeneration efficiency was observed for the Gaziantep (13%) and Yamula (11%) genotypes, while the lowest was observed for the Aydın Siyahı genotype. The range of regeneration efficiency observed for the cultured explants was from 2-13%, with the highest recorded efficiency seen in the Gaziantep genotype (13%).It is noteworthy that all genotypes were successfully transformed in accordance with Protocol 2. The findings of this study imply that the transformation efficiency of eggplant genotypes grown in Turkey is contingent on the protocol and genotype, suggesting that the genetic composition of these genotypes significantly impacts transformation efficiency.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de yaygın olarak yetiştirilen farklı yerel patlıcan genotiplerinin transformasyon etkinliklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada bitkisel materyal olarak 7 farklı yerel patlıcan genotipi(Yamula, Kemer, Topan, Pala, Aydın Siyahı, Bilecik ve Gaziantep) kullanılmıştır. Agrobacterium aracılı transformasyon için protocol 2 farklı(P1 ve P2) kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre P1 Yamula ve Gaziantep genotiplerinde rejenerasyon etkinliğı %1 olarak belirlenirken diğer genotiplerden rejenerasyon elde edilememiştir. Protokol 2’de ise transformasyon etkinliği %2-13 arasında elde edilmiştir En yüksek bitkiye dönüşüm Gaziantep(% 13), ve Yamula(%11) genotiplerinden elde edilirken en düşük bitkiye dönüşüm Aydın Siyahı genotipinden elde edilmiştir. Kültüre alınan eksplantlardan elde edilen rejenerasyon etkinliği ise %2-13 arasında gerçekleşirlen en yüksek rejenerasyon etkinliğine Gaziantep genotipi(%13) sahip olmuştur. Protokol 2’de bütün genotiplerden bitkiye dönüşüm sağlanmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular Türkiye’de lokal olarak yetişen patlıcan genotiplerinin transformasyon etkinliklerinin protokole ve genotipe göre değiştiği bunun nedeninin ise genotiplerin sahip olduğu genetik yapının transformasyon etkinliğinde önemli etkiye sahip olmasından kaynaklanmış olabileceği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koç, Ş., Pinar, H. (2025). Determination of Transformation Efficiency of Different Local Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Genotypes. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 2, 572–579. https://ajindex.com/articles/1266663

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Daunay, M.C., Janick, J. (2007). History and iconography of eggplant. Chronica Horticulturae, 47:16-22
  2. Alas, G.B. Öztekin, H.F. Boyacı / BAHÇE 51 (Özel Sayı 1): 435–447 (2022)
  3. Jadhav, M., Jadhav, A., Pawar, B., Kale, A., Kute, N., (2015). Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of brinjal with cry1F gene for resistance against shoot and fruit borer. J. Crop. Improv. 29, 518–527.
  4. Pratap D, Kumar S, RajSk, Sharma Ak. 2011. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of eggplant (Solanummelongena L.) using cotyledon explants and coat protein gene of Cucumber mosaic virus. Indian J Biotechnol. 10(1):19–24.
  5. Fari M, Nagy I, Csanyi M, Mityko J, Anderasfalvy A.(1995). Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and plant regeneration via organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from cotyledon leaves in eggplant (Solanum melongena L. cv. Kecskemeti Lila) Plant Cell Rep. 15:82-86
  6. Foo, P. C., Lee, Z. H., Chin, C. K., Subramaniam, S., &Chew, B. L. (2018).Shoot induction in white eggplant (Solanum melongena L. cv. Bulat Putih) using 6-benzylaminopurine andkinetin. Tropical life science sresearch, 29(2), 119.
  7. Sharma P, Rajam MV (1995). Genotype, explantand position effects on organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). J. Exp. Bot. 46:135-141
  8. Magioli, C., Pinheiro, M.M., Mansurs, E., (2000). Establishment of an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system for eggplantand study of a potential biotechnologically useful promoter. J. PlantBiotechnol. 2, 43–49, 2000.
  9. Franklin G, Sita GL (2003). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) using root explants. Plant Cell Rep. 21:549-554.
  10. Billings, S., Jelenkovic, G., ChinCheeKok, C. C., & Eberhardt, J. (1997). Theeffect of growth regulators and antibiotics on eggplant transformation.
  11. RotınoGl, GleddıeS. 1990. Transformation of Eggplant (Solanum-Melongena L) Using a Binary Agrobacterium- Tumefaciens Vector. Plant Cell Rep. 9(1):26–29.
  12. Guri, A., &Sink, K. C. (1988). Agrobacteriumtransformation of eggplant. Journal of plantphysiology, 133(1), 52-55.
  13. Magioli C, Rocha APM, de Oliveira DE, Mansur E. (1998). Efficient shoot organogenesis of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) induced bythidiazuron. Plant Cell Rep. 17:661-663
  14. FAO, (2023). http://www.fao.org.tr
  15. Khatun, M., Borphukan, B., Alam, I., Keya, C. A., Khan, H., Reddy, M. K., &Salimullah, M. (2022). An improved Agrobacterium mediated transformation and regeneration protocol for successful genetic engineering and genome editing in eggplant. Scientia Horticulturae, 293, 110716.
  16. Doyle, J. (1991). DNA protocolsforplants. In Molecular techniques in taxonomy (pp. 283-293). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  17. Gisbert C, Prothens J, Nuez F (2006). Efficient regeneration in two potential new crops for subtropical climates, thescarlet (Solanum aethiopicum) and gboma (S. macrocarpon) eggplants. New Zealand J. CropHortic. Sci. 34:55-62.
  18. Sarker RH, Sabina Y, Hoque MI (2006). Multiple shoot formation in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Tissue Cult. Biotechnol. 16:53-61.
  19. Shivaraj, G., &Rao, S. (2011). Rapid and efficient plant regeneration of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) from cotyledonary leaf explants.
  20. Chen, Na, C., Shuanghua, W., Jinglong, F., Bihao, C., Jianjun, L., Changming, C., & Jin, J. (2016). Overexpression of theeggplant (Solanum melongena) NAC familytranscriptionfactor S mNAC suppressesresistancetobacterialwilt. Scientificreports, 6(1), 31568.
  21. Arpaıa S, Mennella G, Onofaro · V, Perrı E, Sunserı F, RotınoGl(1997). Production of transgenic eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) resistant to Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsadecemlineata Say). TheorApplGenet. 95(48):329–334.
  22. Eck J Van, Snyder A. (2006). Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). In: Wang K, editor. Agrobacterium Protocols. Vol. 343. New Jersey: Human a Press. p. 439–447.
  23. Yesmin S, SarkerRh, Hoque Mi, Hashem A, Islam MS. 2014. Agrobacterium Mediate dGenetic Transformation of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Using Cotyledon Explants. Nuclear Science and Applications. 23(1):41–46.
  24. Sidhu, M. K., Dhatt, A. S., &Sidhu, G. S. (2014). Plant regeneration in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.): A review. African Journal of Biotechnology, 13(6), 714-722.
  25. Sagarbarria, M. G. S., Caraan, J. A. M., Lipio, P. G., Oloc-oloc, I. B. M., Watanabe, K. N., &Hautea, D. M. (2023). Agrobacterium-mediated Genetic Transformation and Plant Regeneration from Cotyledons in Philippine Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Acc.‘PH 11424’. bioRxiv, 2023-07.
  26. Muktadir, M. A., Habib, M. A., Mian, M. A. K., &Akhond, M. A. Y. (2016). Regeneration efficiency based on genotype, culture condition and growth regulators of eggplant (Solanummelongena L.). Agriculture and natural resources, 50(1), 38-42.
  27. Murashige, T. andSkoog, F. (1962) A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and BioAssays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol Plantarum, 15, 473-497.