Journals / BELLETEN / 2017 / Cilt: 81 - Sayı: 292

Theoretical Approach for The So-Called Mycenaean Migration in Turkey

Türkiye’de Sözde Miken Göçüne Teorik Yaklaşım

Journal
BELLETEN
Pages
677–702
Publication Date
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it is proposed that this cultural infl uence is correlated to a process and degree of acculturation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:On the basis of archaeological data, it is suggested in this study that Mycenaean migration fl ows to Anatolia, of the kind proposed in ancient sources and by some researchers, did not actually occur.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As an example, when the material culture of the Lycians under the Persian rule was examined and the results were analysed, it could be seen that although the two civilisations are of diff erent periods and had diff erent interactions, the infl uencing and the infl uenced cultures exhibit similar political, sociological and economic behaviors and characteristics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it is proposed that this cultural infl uence is correlated to a process and degree of acculturation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mycenaean · acculturation · Lycia

Abstract

On the basis of archaeological data, it is suggested in this study that Mycenaean migration fl ows to Anatolia, of the kind proposed in ancient sources and by some researchers, did not actually occur. As an example, when the material culture of the Lycians under the Persian rule was examined and the results were analysed, it could be seen that although the two civilisations are of diff erent periods and had diff erent interactions, the infl uencing and the infl uenced cultures exhibit similar political, sociological and economic behaviors and characteristics. Therefore, it is proposed that this cultural infl uence is correlated to a process and degree of acculturation.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, antik kaynaklar ve bazı araştırmacılar tarafından daha evvelce teklif edilen, Anadolu’ya gerçekleştiği iddia edilen Miken göç akınlarının, arkeolojik veriler ele alındığında aslında var olmadığı; model olarak, Pers egemenliği altındaki Lykia’lıların arkeolojik kültürel materyalleri incelenip sonuçlar karşılaştırıldığında: her iki farklı dönem ve farklı kültür etkileşimi olmasına rağmen etkileyen ve etkilenen kültürlerin benzer politik, sosyolojik ve ekonomik davranışlar ve özellikler gösterdiği, ve bu kültürel etkilenimin bir Akülturasyon süreci ve derecesi ile bağlantılı olduğu anlaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖSE, V. (2017). Theoretical Approach for The So-Called Mycenaean Migration in Turkey. BELLETEN, Cilt: 81 - Sayı: 292, 677–702. https://ajindex.com/articles/126546

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akurgal, Meral - Kerschner, Michael - Mommsen, Hans - Niemeier, Wolf-Dietrich (eds.), Töpferzentren der Ostägäis. Archämetrische und archäologische Untersuchungen zur mykenischen, geometrischen und archaischen Keramik aus Fundorten in Westkleinasien, Ergänzungshefte zu den Jahresheften des Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes 3, Vienna 2002.
  2. Aykurt, Ayşegül, “Late Bronze Age Pottery from Çeşme Bağlararası”, Olba 18 2010, pp. 1-63. _________, “An example of Mycenaean Pictorial Pottery: Crater from Liman Tepe”, in: Nazlı Çınardalı-Karaaslan, Ayşegül Aykurt, Neyir Kolankaya-Bostancı, Yiğit Hayati Erbil (eds.), Anadolu Kültürlerine Bir Bakış/Some Observations on Anatolian Cultures. Armağan Erkanal’a Armağan/Compiled in Honor of Armağan Erkanal, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi, Ankara 2014, pp. 53-73.
  3. Bammer, Anton, “Zur Topographie und Städte bauchlichen Entwicklung von Ephesos”, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Instituts in Wien 46, 1961-1963, pp. 136-157.
  4. Benndorf, Otto, Die Besiedlungen bis auf König Kroisos,Forschungen in Ephesos I, Vienna 1906.
  5. Betancourt, Philip P., “The end of the Greek Bronze Age”, Antiquity 50, 1976, pp. 40-47.
  6. Borchhardt, Jürgen, Die Bauskulptur des Heroons von Limyra. Das Grabmal des lykischen Königs Perikles, Istanbuler Forschungen 32, Gebr. Mann Verlag, Tübingen 1976. __________, Die Steine von Zêmuri, Phoibos Verlag, Vienna 1993. __________, “Zum Ostfries des Heroons von Zêmuri/Limyra”, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 43,1993, pp. 351-359. __________, “Zum Kult der Heroen, Herrscher und Gefolgsleute in Lykien zur Zeit der Klassik”, in: Fahri Işık, Havva İşkan (eds.), Grabtypen und Totenkult im südwestlichen Kleinasien. Internationales Kolloquium Antalya 1999, Lykia 6, 2005, pp. 29-48.
  7. Borchhardt, Jürgen - Dobesch, Gerhard (eds.), Akten des II. Internationalen Lykien-Symposium, Wien 1990, Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Vienna 1993.
  8. Brein, Friedrich, “Zur ephesischen Topographie”, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Instituts in Wien 51, 1976-1977, pp. 65-76.
  9. Briant, Pierre - Bourchalat, Rémy (eds.), L’archéologie de l’empire achéménide: nouvelles researches. Actes du colloque organisé au Collége de France par le “Réseau international d’études et de recherches achéménides”, Paris 2003. Éditions de Boccard, Paris 2005.
  10. Büyükkolancı, Mustafa, “Selçuk Ayasuluk Tepesi (Eski Efes) “Appasas” mı?. Is Selçuk Ayasuluk (Old Ephesos) “Appassas”?”, in: Armağan Erkanal-Öktü, Sevinç Günel, Ulaş Deniz (eds.), Batı