SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

Non-Thermal Processing and Preservation Techniques for Shell Eggs: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives

Kabuklu Yumurtada Isıl Olmayan İşleme ve Muhafaza Teknikleri: Güncel Yaklaşımlar ve Gelecek Perspektifler

Muhammed Yüceer(Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Gıda İşleme Bölümü)0000-0001-6709-1347
Rukiye Mavuş(Gemak Gıda Endüstri Makinaları ve Tic. A.Ş)0000-0003-1829-2059
Ecem Işık(Gemak Gıda Endüstri Makinaları ve Tic. A.Ş)0009-0000-5232-0821
Pages
339–356
Publication Date
2026-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, future research needs and possible development perspectives are presented in light of current findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Eggs are one of the most widely consumed animal-based foods worldwide due to their proteins of high biological value and functional properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, shell eggs pose a significant risk factor in foodborne outbreaks associated with pathogens such as Salmonella Enteritidis .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, future research needs and possible development perspectives are presented in light of current findings.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yumurta · Isıl olmayan teknolojiler · Yüzey dezenfeksiyonu

Abstract

Eggs are one of the most widely consumed animal-based foods worldwide due to their proteins of high biological value and functional properties. However, shell eggs pose a significant risk factor in foodborne outbreaks associated with pathogens such as Salmonella Enteritidis . Although traditional thermal pasteurization methods are effective in ensuring food safety, they may lead to losses in the functional and sensory properties of eggs. In recent years, the use of non-thermal technologies for surface disinfection and shelf-life extension of shell eggs has gained increasing attention. In this context, research on innovative methods such as ultraviolet irradiation, ozonation, cold plasma, high hydrostatic pressure, pulsed electric fields, ultrasonic applications& electrolyzed water has yielded promising results. This review discusses the mechanisms, advantages& limitations of these techniques, along with examples of their application in the literature. It also provides a comparative assessment of their industrial potential. Furthermore, future research needs and possible development perspectives are presented in light of current findings.

Özet

Yumurta, yüksek biyolojik değere sahip proteinleri ve fonksiyonel özellikleri nedeniyle dünya genelinde en çok tüketilen hayvansal gıdalardan biridir. Ancak kabuklu yumurtalar, özellikle Salmonella Enteritidis gibi patojenlerle ilişkili gıda kaynaklı salgınlarda önemli bir risk faktörü oluşturmaktadır. Bundan dolayı geleneksel ısıl pastörizasyon yöntemleri, gıda güvenliğini sağlamada etkili olmakla birlikte, yumurtanın fonksiyonel ve duyusal özelliklerinde kayıplara yol açmaktadır. Son yıllarda ise kabuklu yumurtaların yüzey dezenfeksiyonu ve raf ömrünün uzatılmasına yönelik olarak ısıl olmayan teknolojilerin kullanımı giderek daha fazla önem kazanmaktadır. Bu kapsamda ultraviyole ışınlama, ozonlama, soğuk plazma, yüksek hidrostatik basınç, darbeli elektrik alan, ultrasonik uygulamalar ve elektrolize su gibi yenilikçi yöntemler üzerine yürütülen araştırmalar umut verici sonuçlar ortaya koymaktadır. Bu derlemede ise söz konusu tekniklerin mekanizmaları, avantaj ve dezavantajları ile literatürdeki uygulama örnekleri tartışılmakta; ayrıca yöntemlerin endüstriyel potansiyelleri karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bunun yanı sıra, mevcut bulgular ışığında geleceğe yönelik araştırma alanları ve olası gelişim perspektifleri sunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yüceer, M., Mavuş, R., Işık, E. (2026). Non-Thermal Processing and Preservation Techniques for Shell Eggs: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 339–356. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.1773439

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (89)

  1. Mine, Y. (2007). Recent advances in egg protein functionality in the food system. World's Poultry Science Journal. 58(1): 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20020005.
  2. Abeyrathne, E.D., Lee, H.Y. & Ahn, D.U. (2013). Egg white proteins and their potential use in food processing or as nutraceutical and pharmaceutical agents--a review. Poultry Science. 92(12): 3292-9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03391.
  3. Omana, D.A., Wang, J. & Wu, J. (2010). Ovomucin – a glycoprotein with promising potential. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 21(9): 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.07.001.
  4. Liu, Y.F., Oey, I., Bremer, P., Carne, A & Silcock, P. (2019). Modifying the functional properties of egg proteins using novel processing techniques: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 18(4): 986-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12464.
  5. Razi, S.M., Fahim, H., Amirabadi, S. & Rashidinejad, A. (2023). An overview of the functional properties of egg white proteins and their application in the food industry. Food Hydrocolloids. 135: 108183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108183.
  6. Marventano, S., Godos, J., Tieri, M., Ghelfi, F., Titta, L., Lafranconi, A., Gambera, A., Alonzo, E., Sciacca, S., Buscemi, S., Ray, S., Del Rio, D., Galvano, F. & Grosso, G. (2020). Egg consumption and human health: an umbrella review of observational studies. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 71(3): 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2019.1648388.
  7. Zhang, X., Lv, M., Luo, X., Estill, J., Wang, L., Ren, M., Liu, Y., Feng, Z., Wang, J., Wang, X. & Chen, Y. (2020). Egg consumption and health outcomes: a global evidence mapping based on an overview of systematic reviews. Annals of Translational Medicine. 8(21): 1343. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4243.
  8. Jadhav, H.B., Annapure, U.S. & Deshmukh, R.R. (2021). Non-thermal technologies for food processing. Frontiers in Nutrition. 8: 657090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.657090.
  9. Afraz, M.T., Khan, M.R., Roobab, U., Noranizan, M.A., Tiwari, B.K., Rashid, M.T., Inam‐ur‐Raheem, M., Hashemi, S.M.B. & Aadil, R.M. (2020). Impact of novel processing techniques on the functional properties of egg products and derivatives: A review. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 43(12): e13568. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13568.
  10. Miranda, J.M., Anton, X., Redondo-Valbuena, C., Roca-Saavedra, P., Rodriguez, J.A., Lamas, A., Franco, C.M. & Cepeda, A. (2015). Egg and egg-derived foods: effects on human health and use as functional foods. Nutrients. 7(1): 706-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7010706.
  11. Hemeda, S., Abdallh, M., Ibrahim, B. & Ali, E. (2025). Assessment of bacterial contamination, physical quality& internal pH (albumen and yolk) of table eggs in Khartoum North. Scientific Reports. 15(1): 39663. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-23273-8.
  12. Crivei, I.C., Marc, R.A., Rațu, R.N., Mureșan, C.C., Postolache, A.N., Stoica, F., Dumitru Veleșcu, I. & Albu, A. (2025). Advanced risk and hazard analysis in the egg sorting-packing units industry from supplier selection to delivery in chain stores under global food safety initiative integrated food safety programs. Heliyon. 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42587.
  13. White, S., Jackson-Davis, A., Gordon, K., Morris, K., Dudley, A., Abdallah-Ruiz, A., Allgaier, K., Sharpe, K., Yenduri, A.K., Green, K. & Santos, F. (2025). A review of non-thermal interventions in food processing technologies. Journal of Food Protection. 88(6): 100508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100508.
  14. Bermudez-Aguirre, D. and Niemira, B.A. (2023). A review on egg pasteurization and disinfection: Traditional and novel processing technologies. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 22(2): 756-784. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.13088.
  15. Chousalkar, K.K., Khan, S. & McWhorter, A.R. (2021). Microbial quality, safety and storage of eggs. Current Opinion in Food Science. 38: 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2020.10.022.
  16. EFSA, E. (2024). The european union one health 2023 zoonoses report. EFSA Journal. 22(12): e9106. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9106.
  17. Gantois, I., Ducatelle, R., Pasmans, F., Haesebrouck, F., Gast, R., Humphrey, T.J. & Van Immerseel, F. (2009). Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 33(4): 718-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00161.x.
  18. Mendoza, I.C., Luna, E.O., Pozo, M.D., Vasquez, M.V., Montoya, D.C., Moran, G.C., Romero, L.G., Yepez, X., Salazar, R., Romero-Pena, M. & Leon, J.C. (2022). Conventional and non-conventional disinfection methods to prevent microbial contamination in minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und -Technologie. 165: 113714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113714.
  19. El-Sayed, A.S., Ibrahim, H & Farag, M.A. (2022). Detection of potential microbial contaminants and their toxins in fermented dairy products: a comprehensive review. Food Analytical Methods. 15(7): 1880-1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-022-02253-y.
  20. Park, Y.S., Yoo, I.J., Jeon, K.H., Kim, H.K., Chang, E.J & Oh, H.I. (2003). Effects of various eggshell treatments on the egg quality during storage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 16(8): 1224-1229. https://doi.org/10.5713/AJAS.2003.1224.
  21. Bermudez-Aguirre, D. and Niemira, B.A. (2022). Pasteurization of foods with ultrasound: The present and the future. Applied Sciences. 12(20): 10416. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010416.
  22. Wang, Q., Yang, Y., Li, Z., Jin, H., Shu, D., Jin, Y., Jin, G & Sheng, L. (2024). Research advances on the effects of thermal and non-thermal processing techniques on the physicochemical properties and microbiological control of liquid eggs. Food Control. 155: 110106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.110106.
  23. Mahmoud, B.Y., Semida, D.A., Elnesr, S.S., Elwan, H & El-Full, E.A. (2022). Approaches of egg decontamination for sustainable food safety. Sustainability. 15(1): 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010464.
  24. Mazurek, J., Holbert, L., Parrish, M.K & Salehi, E. (2005). Raw eggs—lessons learned from an outbreak of Salmonella serotype enteritidis infections associated with meringue pie. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 11(3): 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1097/00124784-200505000-00004.
  25. Gast, R.K., Regmi, P., Guraya, R., Jones, D.R &erson, K.E & Karcher, D.M. (2019). Contamination of eggs by Salmonella Enteritidis in experimentally infected laying hens of four commercial genetic lines in conventional cages and enriched colony housing. Poultry Science. 98(10): 5023-5027. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez222.
  26. Yüceer, M., Temizkan, R & Caner, C. (2012). Fonksiyonel gıda olarak yumurta: Bileşenleri ve fonksiyonel özellikleri. Akademik Gıda. 10(4): 70-76.
  27. Yüceer, M. (2019). Yumurta ve yumurta ürünleri işleme teknolojisi ve uygulamaları Sidas Medya Ltd.Şti. İzmir, Turkiye.
  28. Choi, B.-G., Min, J.-H & Yoon, K.-S. (2017). Effects of washing and storage temperature on quality and safety of washed shell eggs. Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life. 27(1): 78-87. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2017.2.27.1.78.
  29. Kulshreshtha, G., Ward, C., Calvert, N.D., Benavides-Reyes, C., Rodriguez-Navarro, A.B., Diep, T & Hincke, M.T. (2024). Effect of egg washing and hen age on cuticle quality and bacterial adherence in table eggs. Microorganisms. 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102027.
  30. Hutchison, M.L., Gittins, J., Walker, A., Moore, A., Burton, C & Sparks, N. (2003). Washing table eggs- a review of the scientific and engineering issues. World's Poultry Science Journal. 59(2): 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20030015.
  31. Hudson, L.K., Harrison, M.A., Berrang, M.E & Jones, D.R. (2016). Alternative antimicrobial commercial egg washing procedures. Journal of Food Protection. 79(7): 1216-20. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-423.
  32. Davydovych, V., Shevchenko, L., Melnyk, V., Busol, L & Pylypchuk, O. (2025). Quality and safety of chicken eggs after washing and disinfection with a chlorine-containing agent. Animal Science and Food Technology. 16(1): 141-157. https://doi.org/10.31548/animal.1.2025.141.
  33. Melo, E.F., Climaco, W.L.S., Triginelli, M.V., Vaz, D.P., de Souza, M.R., Baiao, N.C., Pompeu, M.A & Lara, L.J.C. (2019). An evaluation of alternative methods for sanitizing hatching eggs. Poultry Science. 98(6): 2466-2473. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez022.
  34. Al-Ajeeli, M.N. (2013). Development of best practices for shell egg disinfection based upon efficacy and egg quality. Texas A&M University, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Teksas, ABD.
  35. Grudlewska-Buda, K., Wiktorczyk-Kapischke, N., Wałecka-Zacharska, E., Kwiecińska-Piróg, J., Gryń, G., Skowron, K.J., Korkus, J., Gospodarek-Komkowka, E., Bystroń, J., Budzyńska, A., Kruszewski, S., Paluszak, Z &rzejewska, M., Wilk, M & Skowron, K. (2022). Effect of radiant catalytic ionization and ozonation on Salmonella spp. on eggshells. Foods. 11(16): 2452. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162452.
  36. Agregán, R., Munekata, P.E.S., Putnik, P., Pateiro, M., Bursać Kovačević, D., Zavadlav, S & Lorenzo, J.M. (2021). The use of novel technologies in egg processing. Food Reviews International. 39(5): 2854–2874. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2021.1980887.
  37. Rodriguez-Romo, L.A. and Yousef, A.E. (2005). Inactivation of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis on shell eggs by ozone and UV radiation. Journal of Food Protection. 68(4): 711-717. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-68.4.711.
  38. Naderi, N., House, J.D., Pouliot, Y & Doyen, A. (2017). Effects of high hydrostatic pressure processing on hen egg compounds and egg products. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 16(4): 707-720. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12273.
  39. Buzrul, S. (2021). High hydrostatic pressure applications on liquid whole egg. World's Poultry Science Journal. 77(1): 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2020.1866963.
  40. Huang, E., Mittal, G.S & Griffiths, M.W. (2006). Inactivation of Salmonella Enteritidis in liquid whole egg using combination treatments of pulsed electric field, high pressure and ultrasound. Biosystems Engineering. 94(3): 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemeng.2006.03.008.
  41. Sampedro, F., Rodrigo, D., Martinez, A., Barbosa-Canovas, G.V & Rodrigo, M. (2006). Review: Application of pulsed electric fields in egg and egg derivatives. Food Science and Technology International. 12(5): 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013206070430.
  42. Dunn, J. (1996). Pulsed light and pulsed electric field for foods and eggs. Poultry Science. 75: 1133-1136. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0751133.
  43. Niemira, B.A., Bermudez-Aguirre, D., Sites, J & Ukuku, D.O. (2025). Cold plasma as a novel food processing technology, in Nonthermal Processing Technologies for Food. p. 597-614.
  44. Akbar, U., Srivastava, S., Dar, A.H., Dash, K.K., Mondol, S.A., Pandey, V.K., Majeed, T & Sidiqi, U.S. (2024). Potential of cold plasma in enhancing egg white protein for sustainable food applications: a comprehensive review. Sustainable Food Technology. 2(6): 1631–1651. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4fb00155a.
  45. Abdoli, B., Khoshtaghaza, M.H., Ghomi, H., Torshizi, M.A.K., Mehdizadeh, S.A., Pishkar, G & Dunn, I.C. (2023). Cold atmospheric pressure air plasma jet disinfection of table eggs: Inactivation of Salmonella enterica, cuticle integrity and egg quality. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 410: 110474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110474.
  46. Mandal, R., Singh, A & Pratap Singh, A. (2018). Recent developments in cold plasma decontamination technology in the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 80: 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.014.
  47. Niemira, B.A. (2012). Cold plasma decontamination of foods. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. 3: 125-142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101132.
  48. Moritz, M., Wiacek, C., Koethe, M & Braun, P.G., (2017). Atmospheric pressure plasma jet treatment of Salmonella Enteritidis inoculated eggshells. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 245: 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.01.004.
  49. Stolz, N., Weihe, T., Stachowiak, J., Braun, P., Schlüter, O & Ehlbeck, J. (2015). Decontamination of shell eggs by using non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma, in 5th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology (ICBET 2015), IACSIT Press: Singapure. p. 81-84.
  50. Wan, Z., Chen, Y., Pankaj, S.K & Keener, K.M. (2017). High voltage atmospheric cold plasma treatment of refrigerated chicken eggs for control of Salmonella Enteritidis contamination on egg shell. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 76: 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.10.051.
  51. Ragni, L., Berardinelli, A., Vannini, L., Montanari, C., Sirri, F., Guerzoni, M.E & Guarnieri, A. (2010). Non-thermal atmospheric gas plasma device for surface decontamination of shell eggs. Journal of Food Engineering. 100(1): 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.03.036.
  52. Dasan, B.G., Yildirim, T & Boyaci, I.H. (2018). Surface decontamination of eggshells by using non-thermal atmospheric plasma. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 266: 267-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.12.021.
  53. Movasaghi, M., Heydari, M.M., Schwean-Lardner, K., Kirychuk, S., Thompson, B & Zhang, L. (2025). Investigating cold plasma jet effectiveness for eggshell surface decontamination. Food Control. 168: 110928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110928.
  54. Moritz, M., Wiacek, C., Weihe, T., Ehlbeck, J., Weltmann, K.D & Braun, P.G. (2021). Effect of cold atmospheric pressure plasma treatment of eggshells on the total bacterial count inoculated Salmonella Enteritidis and selected quality parameters. Plasma Processes and Polymers. 18(1): 2000061. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.202000061.
  55. Perry, J.J. (2010). Ozone based treatments for inactivation of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis in shell eggs. The Ohio State University, Doktora Tezi. Colombus, Ohio, ABD.
  56. Rodríguez Romo, L.A. (2004). Control of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis in shell eggs by ozone, ultraviolet radiation& heat. The Ohio State University, Doktora Tezi. Colombus, Ohio, ABD.
  57. Perry, J.J. and Yousef, A.E. (2013). Factors affecting thermal resistance of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis ODA 99-30581-13 in shell egg contents and use of heat-ozone combinations for egg pasteurization. Journal of Food Protection. 76(2): 213-9. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-324.
  58. Souza, L.C., Silva Junior, J.L.d., Rufino, J.P.F., Nazaré, S.C.d & Mendonça, M.A.d.F. (2024). Efficiency of ozone compared to commercial sanitizers for hatching eggs from older breeders. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. 46: e65262. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v46i1.65262.
  59. Yüceer, M. and Caner, C. (2020). The effects of ozone, ultrasound and coating with shellac and lysozyme–chitosan on fresh egg during storage at ambient temperature. Part II: microbial quality, eggshell breaking strength and FT‐NIR spectral analysis. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 55(4): 1629-1636. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14422.
  60. Yüceer, M. and Caner, C. (2020). The effects of ozone, ultrasound and coating with shellac and lysozyme–chitosan on fresh egg during storage at ambient temperature – part 1: interior quality changes. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 55(1): 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14301.
  61. Yuceer, M., Aday, M.S & Caner, C. (2016). Ozone treatment of shell eggs to preserve functional quality and enhance shelf life during storage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 96(8): 2755-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7440.
  62. Yüceer, M. and Caner, C. (2016). Ozon uygulamasının taze yumurtanın mikrobiyel kalitesi üzerine depolama süresince etkisinin belirlenmesi. Gıda. 41(1): 15-22. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD15040.
  63. Lasagabaster, A., Arboleya, J.C & de Marañón, I.M. (2011). Pulsed light technology for surface decontamination of eggs: Impact on Salmonella inactivation and egg quality. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 12(2): 124-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2011.01.007.
  64. Cassar, J.R., Bright, L.M., Patterson, P.H., Mills, E.W & Demirci, A. (2021). The efficacy of pulsed ultraviolet light processing for table and hatching eggs. Poultry Science. 100(3): 100923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.021.
  65. Obileke, K., Onyeaka, H., Miri, T., Nwabor, O.F., Hart, A., Al‐Sharify, Z.T., Al‐Najjar, S & Anumudu, C. (2022). Recent advances in radio frequency, pulsed light& cold plasma technologies for food safety. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 45(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.14138.
  66. Levy, C., Gatt, G., Busnel, M., Chemaly, M., Coignard, M & Valette, M.A. (2009) Decontamination of egg shells using a pulsed light treatment, in World Poultry Science Association (WPSA), Proceedings of the 8th Avian French Research Days, St Malo, France, 25-26 March 2009, World's Poultry Science Association (WPSA), Beekbergen, Netherlands.
  67. Hierro, E., Manzano, S., Ordonez, J.A., de la Hoz, L & Fernandez, M. (2009). Inactivation of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis on shell eggs by pulsed light technology. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 135(2): 125-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.07.034.
  68. Caner, C. and Yüceer, M. (2015). Maintaining functional properties of shell eggs by ultrasound treatment. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 95(14): 2880-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7029.
  69. Ribeiro, A.C., Casal, S., Lopes da Silva, J.A & Saraiva, J.A. (2023). Effects of sequential combination of moderate pressure and ultrasound on subsequent thermal pasteurization of liquid whole egg. Foods. 12(13): 2459. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132459.
  70. Caner, C., Arslan, P.G & Yüceer, M. (2025). The efficiency of thermosonication, ultrasonication and pasteurization on the storage stability of fresh eggs. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 102: 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2025.103969.
  71. Yüceer, M., Yıldırım, G & Caner, C. (2022). The effects of sonication on the stability of eggs during extended storage. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 57(9): 6046-6054. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.15958.
  72. Arzeni, C., Pérez, O.E & Pilosof, A.M.R. (2012). Functionality of egg white proteins as affected by high intensity ultrasound. Food Hydrocolloids. 29(2): 308-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.03.009.
  73. Sert, D., Aygun, A & Demir, M.K. (2011). Effects of ultrasonic treatment and storage temperature on egg quality. Poultry Science. 90(4): 869-75. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00799.
  74. Yüceer, M. and Caner, C. (2021). The impact of coatings and novel processing techniques on the functionality of table eggs during extended storage period at ambient temperature. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 45(3): e15261. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15261.
  75. Yüceer, M. (2023). Characterization of pasteurized and sonicated whole shell egg and evaluating egg's interior quality during storage period. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 46(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.14194.
  76. Yüceer, M. (2018). Sıvı yumurtada ultrases tekniği kullanımının ürünün bazı fiziksel ve fonksiyonel özellikleri üzerindeki etkisi. Gıda. 43(6): 1019-1029. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD18079.
  77. Yüceer, M. and Caner, C. (2018). Ultrasound; a novel and Innovative processing method for egg and egg products preservation. Journal of Chemical Biology and Pharmaceutical Chemistry. 1(1:4): 1-3.
  78. Yüceer, M. (2020). Sıvı yumurta sarısının ultrases tekniğiyle işlenmesi ile yapısal özelliklerinin karakterizasyonu ve reolojik davranışının belirlenmesi. Akademik Gıda. (18(4)): 402-410. https://doi.org/10.24323/akademik-gida.850921.
  79. Yüceer, M. (2022). Pastörizasyon ve ultrasonikasyon işlemi uygulanan kabuklu yumurta kullanılarak üretilen beze ürünlerinin fiziki-fonksiyonel özelliklerinin belirlenmesi Catering Guide. 18(97): 56-59.
  80. Yüceer, M. (2023). Investigation of the effects of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration treatments on physicochemical, techno-functional& rheological characteristics of liquid egg albumen and prepared meringue cookie batter. Acta Alimentaria. 52(2): 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1556/066.2023.00039.
  81. Siroli, L., Glicerina, V., Capelli, F., Patrignani, F., Fiorini, M &risano, V., Minelli, M., Gherardi, M., Lanciotti, R., Colombo, V & Romani, S. (2023). Influence of high-pressure homogenization treatments combined with lysozyme activated packaging on microbiological and technological quality of vegetable smoothie during shelf life. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 37: 101093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101093.
  82. Rubilar, J.F., Cruz, R.M., Khmelinskii, I & Vieira, M.C. (2013). Effect of antioxidant and optimal antimicrobial mixtures of carvacrol, grape seed extract and chitosan on different spoilage microorganisms and their application as coatings on different food matrices. International Journal of Food Studies. 2(1): 22-38. https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/2.1.2013.a2.
  83. Sun, S., Wu, X., Hu, B., Guo, M., Zhao, X & Wang, J. (2024). High voltage pulsed electric field: A novel method for killing parasitic eggs on the surface of raisins. Food Res Int. 196: 115127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115127.
  84. Bermúdez-Aguirre, D., Corradini, M.G., Candoğan, K & Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V. (2016). High pressure processing in combination with high temperature and other preservation factors, in High Pressure Processing of Food: Principles, Technology and Applications, V.M. Balasubramaniam, Barbosa-Cánovas, V.G & Lelieveld, L.M.H., Editors, Springer New York: New York, NY. p. 193-215.
  85. Bermúdez-Aguirre, D., Mobbs, T & Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V. (2011). Ultrasound applications in food processing, in Ultrasound Technologies for Food and Bioprocessing,, H. Feng, Editor, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. p. 65-105.
  86. Yi, B. and Xu, H. (2023). Research and development status of prepared foods in china: A review. Applied Sciences. 13(14): 7998. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13147998.
  87. Aganovic, K., Hertel, C., Vogel, R.F., Johne, R., Schluter, O., Schwarzenbolz, U., Jager, H., Holzhauser, T., Bergmair, J., Roth, A., Sevenich, R., Bandick, N., Kulling, S.E., Knorr, D., Engel, K.H & Heinz, V. (2021). Aspects of high hydrostatic pressure food processing: Perspectives on technology and food safety. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 20(4): 3225-3266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12763.
  88. Nema, P.K., Sehrawat, R., Ravichandran, C., Kaur, B.P., Kumar, A., Tarafdar, A & Aadil, R.M. (2022). Inactivating food microbes by high-pressure processing and combined nonthermal and thermal treatment: A review. Journal of Food Quality. 2022: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5797843.
  89. Mondal, P.P., Galodha, A., Verma, V.K., Singh, V., Show, P.L., Awasthi, M.K., Lall, B., Anees, S., Pollmann, K & Jain, R. (2023). Review on machine learning-based bioprocess optimization, monitoring& control systems. Bioresource Technology. 370: 128523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128523.