SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1

Evaluation of coastal areas landscape designs in terms of accessibility with spatial syntax and spatial solution methods: Çanakkale Eski Kordon example

Kıyı alanlarının peyzaj tasarımlarının erişilebilirlik açısından spatial syntax ve mekânsal çözümleme yöntemleri ile değerlendirilmesi: Çanakkale Eski Kordon örneği

Elif Sağlık(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5230-3869
Necmettin Gür(CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8856-7188
Pages
413–434
Publication Date
2026-01-14
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the comparisons between the criteria are consistent and the proposed design strategies have the potential to improve accessibility.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Coastal areas are of great ecological, social and economic importance, and ensuring accessibility is a critical requirement in sustainable urban planning processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results show that the comparisons between the criteria are consistent and the proposed design strategies have the potential to improve accessibility.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, the proposed design criteria offer an important step towards the creation of more accessible coastal areas based on universal design principles.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Coastal areas · accessibility · spatial syntax

Abstract

Coastal areas are of great ecological, social and economic importance, and ensuring accessibility is a critical requirement in sustainable urban planning processes. This study aims to analyze the accessibility level of Çanakkale Eski Kordon coastal area. Visibility Graph Analysis (VGA) and Axial Line Analysis were performed within the scope of the Spatial Syntax method, and the physical and structural elements of the area were evaluated with the Spatial Solution method. The analysis revealed that the area has various accessibility deficiencies in terms of visual continuity, surface coverings, boundary elements and seating units. In order to overcome these deficiencies, design criteria were identified and prioritized using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The results show that the comparisons between the criteria are consistent and the proposed design strategies have the potential to improve accessibility. In addition, the use of Spatial Syntax, Spatial Solution and AHP methods together in this study is a first in landscape architecture literature and brings an innovative perspective to the evaluation of coastal areas in terms of accessibility. In this context, the proposed design criteria offer an important step towards the creation of more accessible coastal areas based on universal design principles.

Özet

Kıyı alanları ekolojik, sosyal ve ekonomik açıdan büyük önem taşımaktadır ve erişilebilirliğin sağlanması sürdürülebilir kentsel planlama süreçlerinde kritik bir gerekliliktir. Bu çalışma Çanakkale Eski Kordon kıyı alanının erişilebilirlik düzeyini analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Spatial Syntax yöntemi kapsamında Görünürlük Grafiği Analizi (VGA) ve Eksenel Çizgi Analizi gerçekleştirilmiş, Mekânsal Çözümleme yöntemi ile alanın fiziksel ve yapısal unsurları değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda alanın görsel süreklilik, yüzey kaplamaları, sınır elemanları ve oturma birimleri açısından çeşitli erişilebilirlik eksikliklerine sahip olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu eksikliklerin giderilmesi için Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) yöntemi kullanılarak tasarım kriterleri belirlenmiş ve önceliklendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, kriterler arasındaki karşılaştırmaların tutarlı olduğunu ve önerilen tasarım stratejilerinin erişilebilirliği iyileştirme potansiyeline sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca bu çalışmada Spatial Syntax, Mekânsal Çözümleme ve AHP yöntemlerinin birlikte kullanılması peyzaj mimarlığı literatüründe bir ilk olup kıyı alanlarının erişilebilirlik açısından değerlendirilmesine yenilikçi bir bakış açısı getirmektedir. Bu bağlamda önerilen tasarım kriterleri, evrensel tasarım ilkelerine dayalı daha erişilebilir kıyı alanlarının oluşturulması yolunda önemli bir adım sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sağlık, E., Gür, N., *, E. S. (2026). Evaluation of coastal areas landscape designs in terms of accessibility with spatial syntax and spatial solution methods: Çanakkale Eski Kordon example. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1, 413–434. https://doi.org/10.25092/baunfbed.1771223

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Tachir, G., Kıran Çakır, H., and Ocak, B., Assessment of regulations in coastal areas based on coastal area design parameters: The case of Gallipoli-Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 11, 4, 659-674, (2023).
  2. Bogenç, Ç., Rize Derepazarı turizm potansiyelinin arttırılmasına yönelik planlama stratejileri. Uluslararası Hakemli Tasarım ve Mimarlık Dergisi, 21, 180-205, (2020).
  3. Isa, M. M., Sukri, F. I. L. M., Tahar, K. N., and Nor, A. N. M., Coastal protection strategies in sustainable landscape design at Kelanang Beach, Selangor. Journal of Tropical Resources and Sustainable Science (JTRSS), 11, 1, 15-24, (2023).
  4. Lu, S., Dong, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, S., and Yu, X., Landscape Design Schemes for Coastal Cities Based on Marine Culture. Journal of Coastal Research, 110, SI, 10-14, (2020).
  5. Köpsel, V., and Walsh, C., Coastal landscapes for whom? Adaptation challenges and landscape management in Cornwall. Marine Policy, 97, 278-286, (2018).
  6. Shan, P., Coastal landscape planning and design: A low-impact development–based study. Journal of Coastal Research, 106, SI, 359-362, (2020).
  7. Turgut, H., Erzurum historical urban fabric space syntax and accessibility analysis. Megaron, 17, 4, 673-683, (2022).
  8. Cüce, B., and Ortaçeşme, V., Accessibility to urban green spaces. Landscape, 2, 2, 65-77, (2020).
  9. Hurst, K., Lee, C., and Ndubisi, F. Universal design in playground environments: A place‐based evaluation of amenities, use, and physical activity. Landscape Journal, 42, 2, 55-80, (2023).
  10. Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Ž., and Belhaj, M., Rethinking Accessibility: How Universal Design Is Shaping Rural Areas in Lithuania. Sustainability, 17, 18, 8311, (2025).
  11. Moore, A., Boyle, B., and Lynch, H., Designing for inclusion in public playgrounds: a scoping review of definitions, and utilization of universal design. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 18, 8, 1453-1465, (2023).
  12. Gupta, A., Yadav, M., and Nayak, B. K., A Systematic Literature Review on Inclusive Public Open Spaces: Accessibility Standards and Universal Design Principles. Urban Science, 9, 6, 181, (2025).
  13. Kalay, G., and Bogenç, Ç., An Evaluation of urban image and the use of urban space in Karabük City Center. Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 8, 57, 645-655, (2022).
  14. Ardıçoğlu, R., and Uslu, A., Analyzing morphological changings of Tophane district after land fillings with using space syntax method. Megaron, 17, 1, 151-165, (2022).
  15. Li, R., and Mao, L., Spatial characteristics of suburban villages based on spatial syntax. Sustainability, 14, 21, 14195, (2022).
  16. Long, Y., Qin, J., Wu, Y., and Wang, K., Analysis of urban park accessibility based on space syntax: Take the urban area of Changsha City as an example. Land, 12, 5, 1061, (2023).
  17. Luo, Y., and Lin, Z., Spatial accessibility analysis and optimization simulation of urban riverfront space based on space syntax and POIs: A case study of Songxi County, China. Sustainability, 15, 20, 14929, (2023).
  18. Viviani, G., Visalli, A., Montefinese, M., Vallesi, A., and Ambrosini, E., The Stroop legacy: A cautionary tale on methodological issues and a proposed spatial solution. Behavior Research Methods, 56, 5, 4758-4785, (2024).
  19. Sleptsov, O., and Karban, A., Specific features of designing educational centers in the areas with challenging landscape in Ukraine. Technical Transactions, 2019, 116, 79-84, (2019).
  20. Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., and Mirfenderesk, H., Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 54-65, (2015).
  21. Kahvecioğlu, C., and Sağlık, A., Evaluation of urban equipment elements of Çanakkale city center coastal cordon in terms of ergonomic criteria. Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences (JOSHAS), 9, 61, 2402-2416, (2023).
  22. Gür, N., and Sağlık, E., A Spatial Solution study at the Zero Point of History: Göbeklitepe Archaeological Site (Şanlıurfa). GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences, 7, 1, 76-91, (2024).
  23. Gür, N., and Kahraman, Ö., An ethnobotanical research on woody ornamental plants used in landscaping of recreation areas in Çanakkale City. International Anatolian Agriculture, Food, Environment and Biology Congress, 440-448, Kastamonu, (2024).
  24. Gür, N., and Kahraman, Ö., Evaluation of the Usability of Some Geophyte Species Growing Naturally in Çanakkale Flora as Ornamental Plants by AHP and TOPSIS Method. The Journal of Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15, 2, 111-124, (2024).
  25. Google Earth Pro., Çanakkale, https://earth.google.com/web/@40.13781829,26.41083099,8827.28939503a,0d,35y,0.0006h,5.9329t,0r/data=CgRCAggBOgMKATBCAggASg0I____________ARAA, (05.05.2025).
  26. Demirci, G., and Arabacıoğlu, B. C., On convex space: Example of an indoor ski center. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8, 2, 935-946, (2023).
  27. Gür, N., and Erduran Nemutlu, F., Use of vertical gardens in historical areas: Hasan Mevsuf Martyrdom example, Çanakkale. Bartın Forestry Faculty Journal, 23, 3, 792-807, (2021).
  28. Dmytrów, K., and Gnat, S., Application of AHP method in assessment of the influence of attributes on value in the process of real estate valuation. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 27, 4, 15-26, (2019).
  29. Teng, Y. M., Wu, K. S., and Wang, M. J., Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and delphi analysis to evaluate key factors in the development of the Taiwan cruise tourism industry. Journal of Coastal Research, 36, 4, 828-833, (2020).
  30. Saaty, T. L., The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach. Operations Research, 61, 5, 1101-1118, (2013).
  31. Rasaei, F., Yousefi, H., Razeghi, M., Naseri, A., Abdoos, M., and Ghasempour, R., Optimal selection of CSP site for desalination system using GIS and AHP method in Hormozgan province, Iran. Energy Reports, 13, 2255-2268, (2025).
  32. Özen, M., and Borat, O., AHP, fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach in supplier selection in automotive sub-industry sector. Istanbul Commerce University Journal of Science, 19, 38, 152-171, (2020).
  33. Ali, S., Biermanns, P., Haider, R., and Reicherter, K., Landslide susceptibility mapping by using a geographic information system (GIS) along the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (Karakoram Highway), Pakistan. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 19, 5, 999-1022, (2019).
  34. Bagheri, M., Sulaiman, W. N. A., and Vaghefi, N., Application of geographic information system technique and analytical hierarchy process model for land-use suitability analysis on coastal area. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 17, 1, 1-10, (2013).
  35. Mercan, Ç., Assessment of walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivation land suitability using a multiple-criteria decision-making method in Southeastern Turkey. Scientific Reports, 15, 1, 2716, (2025).
  36. Open Street Map., Çanakkale Eski Kordon, https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/40.15287/26.40070&layers=HN, (05.05.2025).
  37. Koç, C., Tactile surface applications for the visually impaired: Diyarbakır example. Beyond the Horizon Science Journal, 21, 1, 125-157, (2021).
  38. Arslan, B., Evaluation of Safranbolu historical tourism buildings and tourism areas in terms of disabled access. Master's Thesis, Karabük University, Institute of Graduate Education, Department of Architecture, Karabük, (2020).
  39. Yüce Eşkil, Ö., Study of Ankara urban banks in the context of outdoor design features for the disabled. Master's Thesis, Bartın University, Institute of Science, Department of Landscape Architecture, Bartın, (2011).
  40. Çakar, H., Ergonomic approaches in barrier-free parking design. Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 36, 1, 1-14, (2022).
  41. Yılmaz, T., Olgun, R., and Kaplan, M., Plant design opportunities for the disabled, 5th Congress of Landscape Architecture, 1146-1150, Adana, (2013).
  42. Olgun, R., Landscape design approaches to increase the accessibility of urban parks for the visually impaired. Turkish Journal of Forest Science, 3, 2, 170-181, (2019).
  43. TSE-7941, Seating Benches, 2nd Edition, Turkish Standards, Ankara, (2019).
  44. Mankan, M., Accessibility Concept and Evaluation of Accessibility in Terms Of Regulations. Master's Thesis, Eskişehir Technical University, Graduate School of Sciences, Department of Architecture, Program in Building Design, Eskişehir, (2019).
  45. Çelik, A., Ender, E., and Akdeniz, N. S., Landscape design in barrier-free parks. Journal of Agricultural Sciences Research, 8, 2, 5-11, (2015).
  46. Kuru Aktürk, N. B., and Ekim, A., Disabled child in society. Arel University Health Sciences Journal, 7, 3, 178-185, (2023).
  47. TSE-9111, Accessibility Requirements in Buildings for Persons with Disabilities and Mobility Impairments, 1st Edition, Turkish Standards, Ankara, (2023).
  48. Pouya, S., The importance of universal equipment designs to increase accessibility and awareness of disabled individuals and some design suggestions in related landscape areas. Journal of Social Work, 5, 2, 209-229, (2021).
  49. Öter, B., A Research on The Implementation of Space Syntax Method in Accessibility Studies in The Antalya City Center. Master's Thesis, Akdeniz University, Institute of Science, Landscape Architecture Department, Antalya, (2018).
  50. Kamer Aksoy, Ö., and Köşe, H., Barrier-free design in campus open spaces: Aydın Adnan Menderes University South Campus example. Journal of Spatial Planning and Design, 2, 1, 1-12, (2022).