SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2015 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 36

Değişim Körlüğü ve Uzun Süreli Bellek Arasındaki İlişki

OSMAN İYİLİKCİ
Pages
39–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, contemporary developments about the relationship between long-term memory and change detection are discussed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Change detection is the ability to spot a visual change in the physical environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Generally, individuals have difficulty to perceive a change that takes place in the scene, and this difficulty while detecting changes is named as change blindness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, contemporary developments about the relationship between long-term memory and change detection are discussed
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Change detection is the ability to spot a visual change in the physical environment. Generally, individuals have difficulty to perceive a change that takes place in the scene, and this difficulty while detecting changes is named as change blindness. In this paper, studies that investigate the relationship between long-term memory and change blindness are reviewed and a classification regarding these studies is proposed. Additionally, contemporary developments about the relationship between long-term memory and change detection are discussed

Özet

Değişim saptama, fiziksel çevrede gerçekleşen görsel bir değişimi fark edebilmek anlamına gelmektedir. Genellikle bireyler sahnede gerçekleşen bir değişimi algılamakta zorlanmaktadır ve değişim saptamadaki bu güçlük değişim körlüğü olarak adlandırılmıştır. Bu yazıda değişim saptama ve değişim körlüğünün uzun süreli bellek ile olan bağlantısını inceleyen araştırmalar gözden geçirilerek, bu araştırmalara ilişkin bir sınıflandırma önerilmiş ve değişim saptama ile uzun süreli bellek arasındaki ilişkiye dair yeni gelişmeler tartışılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

İYİLİKCİ, O. (2015). Değişim Körlüğü ve Uzun Süreli Bellek Arasındaki İlişki. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 36, 39–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/125993

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Angelone, B. L., Levin, D. T. ve Simons, D. J. (2003). The re- lationship between change detection and recognition of centrally attended objects in motion pictures. Perception, 32, 947-962.
  2. Archambault, A., O'Donnel, C. ve Schyns, P. G. (1999). Blind to object changes: When learning the same object at dif- ferent levels of categorization modifies its perception. Psychological Science, 10, 249-255.
  3. Beck, M. R. ve Levin, D. T. (2003). The role of representational volatility in recognizing pre- and postchange objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 458-468.
  4. Davis, D., Loftus, E. F., Vanous, S. ve Cucciare, M. (2007). 'Unconscious transference' can be an instance of 'change blindness'. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 605-623.
  5. Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H. ve Penrod, S. D. (2006). Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mug- shot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 287-307.
  6. Henderson, J. M. ve Hollingworth, A. (1999a). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243-271.
  7. Henderson, J. M. ve Hollingworth, A. (1999b). The role of fixa- tion position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 10, 438-443.
  8. Hollingworth, A. ve Henderson, J. M. (2000). Semantic infor- mativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 213-235.
  9. Karacan, H. Ü. ve Hayhoe, M. M. (2008). Is attention drawn to changes in familiar scenes? Visual Cognition, 16, 356- 374. Levin, D. T., Simons, D. J., Angelone, B. L. ve Chabris, C. F. (2002). Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 289-302.
  10. Loftus, E. F. (1996). Memory distortion and false memory cre- ation. The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychia- try and the Law, 24, 281-295. Mäntylä, T. ve Sundsröm, A. (2004). Changing scenes: memory for naturalistic events following change blindness. Mem- ory, 12, 696-706.
  11. Masuda, T. ve Nisbett, R. E. (2006). Culture and change blind- ness. Cognitive Science, 30, 381-399.
  12. Mitroff, S. R., Simons, D. J. ve Levin, D. T. (2004). Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1268-1281.
  13. Nelson, K. J., Laney, C., Fowler, N. B., Knowles, E. D., Davis, D. ve Loftus, E. F. (2011). Change blindness can cause mistaken eyewitness identification. Legal and Crimino- logical Psych