SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Relationships among Change Oriented Leadership, Organizational Engagement, and the Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Değişim Odaklı Liderlik, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İlişkisi

CEMAL ZEHİR
ALi YAVUZ
Pages
97–115
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Organizational engagement mediated this relationship

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Leadership has been a universal phenomenon and affected organizations and societies of various types throughout history.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As such, organizational leaders play a significant role in the attainment of organizations’ goals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Organizational engagement mediated this relationship
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Değişim Odaklı Liderlik · Örgütsel Özdeşleşme · Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı

Abstract

Leadership has been a universal phenomenon and affected organizations and societies of various types throughout history. It is a widely accepted fact that leadership is closely related with organizational effectiveness. As such, organizational leaders play a significant role in the attainment of organizations’ goals. Organizations with successful leaders have adapted to changes more easily. The aim of this study is to show the relationships among change oriented leadership, organizational engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. Participants of the study were administrative staff and teachers working at 4 public schools in Istanbul. 310 questionnaires were collected and analyzed through AMOS and SPSS software. A significant positive relationship was found between change oriented leadership and organizational citizenship behavior. Organizational engagement mediated this relationship

Özet

Liderlik, toplumların var olduğu ilk günlerden bu yana yaşamın her alanına girmiştir. Tarih boyunca, en büyük organizasyonlardan en küçüğüne kadar amaç ve hedeflerin gerçekleştirilmesi, çoğu zaman liderlik ve lidere endekslenmiştir. Toplumlar, liderleri sayesinde çağın gerektirdiği değişimlere uyum sağlayarak varlıklarını devam ettirebilmişlerdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; değişim odaklı liderlik, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişkiyi eğitim sektöründe incelemektir.Bu araştırmayaİstanbul’daki 4 devlet okulunda görev yapan toplam 310 yönetici ve öğretmen katılmıştır. Toplanan veriler AMOS ve SPSSyazılımları kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, değişimci liderlik ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasında anlamlı düzeyde olumlu ilişki bulunmuş, örgütsel özdeşleşmenin bu ilişkide aracı rolü bulunduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEHİR, C., YAVUZ, A. (2017). Relationships among Change Oriented Leadership, Organizational Engagement, and the Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 97–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/125897

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acar, A. Z. (2006). Örgütsel Yurttaşlık Davranışı: Kavramsal Gelişimi ile Kişisel ve Örgütsel Etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7 (1) 1-14.
  2. Agard, K. A. (2010). Leadership in Nonprofit Organizations: A Reference Handbook. California:Sage Publications, 917-984.
  3. Allison, B. J., Voss, R. S. ve Dryer, S. (2001). Student Classroom and Career Success: The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Education for Business, 76(5), 282-288.
  4. Anderson, J. C. ve Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and The Organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 1-27.
  5. Babcock-Roberson, M. E. ve Strickland, O. J. (2010). The Relationship Between Charismatic Leadership, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. The Journal Of Psychology, 144(3), 313-326.
  6. Bakar, H. A. ve McCann, R. M. (2015). The Mediating Effect of Leader–Member Dyadic Communication Style Agreement on the Relationship Between Servant Leadership and Group-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(1), 32-58.
  7. Bolat, T. (2008a).
  8. Dönüşümcü Liderlik, Personeli Güçlendirme ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İlişkisi. Ankara:
  9. Detay Yayıncılık. Bolat, O. İ. ve Bolat, T. (2008b). Otel İşletmelerinde Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İlişkisi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(19),79. Bagozzi, R. P. ve Yi, Y. (1988). On The Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  10. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. ve Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421-458.
  11. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. ve Derks, D. (2015). Who Takes The Lead? A Multi‐Source Diary Study on Leadership, Work Engagement, and Job Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior,30(7), 775-770.
  12. Choi, J. N. (2007). Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Effects of Work Environment Characteristics and Intervening Psychological Processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 467-485.
  13. Chen, C. Y. ve Yang, C. F. (2012). The İmpact of Spiritual Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Multi-Sample Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 107-114.
  14. Detert, J. R. ve Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership Behavior and Employ