Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Causality between Gold-Oil Parity and Real Exchange Rate: A Research on 7 Countries Producing Oil and Gold

Altın-Petrol Paritesi ile Döviz Kuru Arasındaki Nedensellik: Altın ve Petrol Üreten 7 Ülke Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Pages
69–83
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

H test results show that the real exchange rates in the countries studied against to negative and positive shocks in the gold-oil parity have reacted in different directions fall-rise .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the causality between the gold-oil parity and the real exchange rate in seven countries Mexico, Brazil, Russia, Indonesia, Australia, China and the United States , both gold and oil producers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, Toda and Yamamoto TY linear causality test and Hatemi-J H symmetric causality tests were performed using the monthly data of 2008-2015 period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:H test results show that the real exchange rates in the countries studied against to negative and positive shocks in the gold-oil parity have reacted in different directions fall-rise .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Altın-Petrol Paritesi · Reel Döviz Kuru · Petrol ve Altın Üreten Ülkeler

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the causality between the gold-oil parity and the real exchange rate in seven countries Mexico, Brazil, Russia, Indonesia, Australia, China and the United States , both gold and oil producers. For this purpose, Toda and Yamamoto TY linear causality test and Hatemi-J H symmetric causality tests were performed using the monthly data of 2008-2015 period. According to the findings of the TY test, there is causality between the gold-oil parity and the real exchange rate in Brazil, Russia and China. H test results show that the real exchange rates in the countries studied against to negative and positive shocks in the gold-oil parity have reacted in different directions fall-rise . In conclusion, the analyzes done in this study show that the causality relationship between the gold-oil parity and the real exchange rate is not always consistent with the theoretical expectations and is sensitive to the analysis methods used

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı hem altın hem de petrol üretimi olan 7 ülkede Meksika, Brezilya, Rusya, Endonezya, Avustralya, Çin ve ABD altın-petrol paritesi ile reel döviz kuru arasındaki nedenselliği incelemektir. Bu amaçla 2008-2015 dönemine ait aylık veriler kullanılarak, Toda ve Yamamoto TY lineer nedensellik testi ve Hatemi-J H simetrik nedensellik testleri yapılmıştır. TY testinden elde edilen bulgulara göre Brezilya, Rusya ve Çin’de altın-petrol paritesi ile reel döviz kuru arasında nedensellik bulunmaktadır. H testi sonuçları ise altın-petrol paritesindeki negatif ve pozitif şoklara karşı ele alınan ülkelerde reel döviz kurlarının farklı yönlerde düşme-yükselme tepki verdiklerini göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak bu çalışmada yapılan analizler, altın-petrol paritesi ile reel döviz kuru arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin teorik beklentilerle her zaman uyumlu olmadığını ve kullanılan analiz yöntemlerine duyarlı olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPLAN, F., YAPRAKLI, S. (2017). Causality between Gold-Oil Parity and Real Exchange Rate: A Research on 7 Countries Producing Oil and Gold. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 69–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/125889

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Ai, H., Shanying, X. ve Shouyang W. (2008). Australian Dollars Exchange Rate and Gold Prices: An Interval Method Analysis, 7th International Symposium on Operations Research and Its Applications (ISORA’08), Lijiang China, Oct 31- November 3: 46-52.
  2. Amano, R.A. ve Norden, S. (1998).
  3. Exchange Rates and Oil Prices, Review of International Economics, 6 (4): 683-694.
  4. Amihud, Y. (1994). Evidence on Exchange Rates and the Valuation of Equity Shares, in Y. Amihud and R. Levich (eds.), Exchange Rates and Corporate Performance, Irwin, USA: 49-59.
  5. Arfaoui, M. ve Rejeb, A.B. (2016).
  6. Oil, Gold, US Dollar and Stock Market Interdependencies: A Global Analytical Insight, MPRA Paper No. 70452, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70452/, (E. T. 04.01.2017).
  7. Azar, S.A. (2015). The Relation of the US Dollar with Oil Prices, Gold Prices, and the US Stock Market, Research in World Economy, 6 (1): 159-171.
  8. Bhunia, A. (2013). Cointegration and Causal Relationship Among Crude Price, Domestic Gold Price and Financial Variables an Evidence of BSE and NSE, Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business Research, 2 (1): 1-10.
  9. Bodart, V., Candelon, B. ve Carpantier, J-F. (2012). Real Exchanges Rates in Commodity Producing Countries: A Reappraisal, Journal of International Money and Finance, 31 (6): 1482-1502.
  10. Caprio, J. ve Clark, P.B. (1981). Oil Price Shocks in A Portfolio-Balance Model, International Finance Discussion Papers, 181: 1-24.
  11. Cashin, P., Cespedes, L. ve Sahay, R. (2004). Commodity Currencies and the Real Exchange Rate. Journal of Development Economics, 75: 239-268.
  12. Chen, S. ve Chen, H. (2007), Oil Prices and Real Exchange Rates. Energy Economics, 29: 390-404.
  13. Chen, Y-C. ve Rogoff, K. (2003). Commodity Currencies. Journal of International Economics, 60: 133-160.
  14. Ciner, Ç., Constantin, G. ve Brian L.M. (2013). Hedges and Safe Havens: An Examination of Stocks, Bonds, Gold, Oil and Exchange Rates. International Review of Financial Analysis, 29: 202-211.
  15. Coudert, V., Mignon, V. ve Penot, A. (2008).Oil Price and the Dollar.Energy Studies Review, 15 (2): 45-58.
  16. Dauvin, M. (2014). Energy Prices and the Real Exchange Rate of Commodity- Exporting Countries. International Economics, 137: 52-72.
  17. Dauvin, M. (2013). Energy Prices and the Real Exchange Rate of Commodity- Exporting Countries. CEPII Research Center, Working Papers, 2013-28.
  18. Furlong, F. ve Ingenito, R. (1996).
  19. Commodity Prices and Inflation, Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 2: 27-47.
  20. Golub, S.S. (1983). Oil