SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2016 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 38

Çalışanların Benlik Yönelimlerinin Liderlik İhtiyaçları ve Psikolojik İyi Oluş Halleri Üzerindeki Rolü

Aytül Ayşe ÖZDEMİR
Pages
23–34
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, individuational self-orientation was found to be negatively correlated with task-oriented leadership need

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the present study was to explore the impact of relational and individuational self-orientations on leadership need and psychological well-being.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample consisted of 122 respondents working for a private retail company.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, individuational self-orientation was found to be negatively correlated with task-oriented leadership need
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore the impact of relational and individuational self-orientations on leadership need and psychological well-being. The sample consisted of 122 respondents working for a private retail company. Accordingly, Balanced Integrated and Differantiation Scale, Leadership Need Scale and Psychological Well-Being Scale were administrated. Data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The findings pointed out that both relational and individuational self-orientations predicted psychological well-being. However, individuational self-orientation was found to be negatively correlated with task-oriented leadership need

Özet

Bu makaledeki çalışmada ilişki ve kendileşme benlik yönelimlerinin psikolojik iyi oluş hali ve liderlik ihtiyaçları üzerindeki rolünün araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemi perakende sektöründe özel bir şirkette çalışan 122 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplama sürecinde Dengeli Bütünleşme ve Ayrışma Ölçeği, Liderliğe Duyulan İhtiyaç Ölçeği ve Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Veriler çoklu regresyon analizi ile çözümlenmiştir. Bulgular, hem ilişki hem de kendileşme yöneliminin psikolojik iyi oluş halini etkilediğini göstermiştir. Buna karşın, sadece kendileşme benlik yönelimi ile görev odaklı liderlik ihtiyacı arasında olumsuz bir ilişki bulgulanmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, A. A. (2016). Çalışanların Benlik Yönelimlerinin Liderlik İhtiyaçları ve Psikolojik İyi Oluş Halleri Üzerindeki Rolü. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 38, 23–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/125801

References (8)

  1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso. Arslan-Akfırat, S. ve Öner-Özkan, B. (2010). Ulusal/etnik kimliklerin stratejik inşası: Kuzey Kıbrıs örneği, Bilig 52, 1-32.
  2. Brown, R. (2010). Prejudice: Its social psychology. WileyBlackwell, Oxford. Billiet, J., Maddens, B. ve Beerten, R. (2003). National identity and attitude toward foreigners in a multinational state: A replication. Political Psychology, 24(2), 241-257.
  3. Billig, M. (1996). Nationalism as an international ideology: Imagining the nation, others and the world of nations. G. M. Breakwell ve E. Lyons, (Ed.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change içinde (181-194). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Blank, T. ve Schmidt, S. (2003). National identity in a United Germany: Nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Political Psychology, 24(2), 289-312.
  4. Bora, T. (2003). Nationalist discourse in Turkey. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 102(2/3), 433-451.
  5. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R. ve Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. N. Ellemers, R. Spears ve B. Doosje, (Ed.), Social identity: context, commitment, content içinde (35-58). Oxford: Blackwell. Breakwell, G. (1996). Identity processes and social change. G. M. Breakwell ve E. Lyons, (Ed.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social changes içinde (13-30). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475-482.
  6. Brewer, M. B. (1993). The role of distinctiveness in social identity and group behavior. M. Hogg ve Abrams, (Ed.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives içinde (1-16). New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf. Cairns, E., Kenworthy, J. Campbell, A. ve Hewstone, M. (2006). The role of in-group identification, religious group membership and intergroup conflict in moderating in-group and out-group affect. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 701-716.
  7. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Paladino, M. P. ve Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: In-group identification, in group entitativity, and in group bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 135-143.
  8. Cinnirella, M. (1996). A social identity perspective on European integration. G. M. Breakwell ve E. Lyons, (Ed.), Changing European identities: Social psycholog