SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul İktisat Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 67 Issue: 1

AVERAGE EFFECTIVE TAX RATES OF TURKEY IN EU ACCESSION PROCESS

Başak Tanınmış Yücememiş(MARMARA UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF BANKING AND INSURANCE)
Kazım Okan Erol
Pages
—
Publication Date
2017-07-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Those theoretical inferences will be tested by EU-Turkey economic integration case with simple correlation analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to explain how public revenue system of Turkey has evolved in an economic integration process that explores the correlation between economic integration and tax revenues from a fiscal federalism perspective in the EU and Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Main research problem of this study is that to analyze how economic integration affected tax revenues of Turkey since 1990.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Those theoretical inferences will be tested by EU-Turkey economic integration case with simple correlation analysis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Economic integration · average effective tax rate · EU-Turkey relations

Abstract

This study aims to explain how public revenue system of Turkey has evolved in an economic integration process that explores the correlation between economic integration and tax revenues from a fiscal federalism perspective in the EU and Turkey. Main research problem of this study is that to analyze how economic integration affected tax revenues of Turkey since 1990. High degree of economic integration increases factor mobility and affects public revenues of member states. Those theoretical inferences will be tested by EU-Turkey economic integration case with simple correlation analysis.

Özet

Bu çalışma, mali federalizm çerçevesinde ekonomik entegrasyon ve vergi gelirleri arasındaki ilişkiyi dikkate alarak, Türkiye'nin vergi gelirlerinin AB üyelik süreci içerisinde nasıl değiştiğini açıklamaktadır. Makalenin ana konusu 1990 yılından itibaren Türkiye'nin ekonomik bütünleşme sürecinin vergi gelirleri üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymaktır. İleri derecede ekonomik bütünleşme ülkeler arasındaki üretim faktörlerinin hareketliliğini arttırmakta ve bu ülkelerin vergi gelirlerini etkilemektedir. Teorik ol arak açıklanan bu hususlar, Türkiye -AB ekonomik bütünleşme süreci ve vergi gelirleri arasındaki ilişki basit korelasyon analizi ile test edilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yücememiş, B. T., Erol, K. O. (2017). AVERAGE EFFECTIVE TAX RATES OF TURKEY IN EU ACCESSION PROCESS. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, Volume: 67 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.26560/iuifm.331642

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Aizenman, J., & Jinjarak, Y. (2009). Globalisation and Developing Countries – a Shrinking Tax Base? Journal of Development Studies, 45(5), 653–671.
  2. Bretschger, L., & Hettich, F. (2005). Globalization and International Tax Competition: Empirical Evidence Based on Effective Tax Rates. Journal of Economic Integration, 530–542.
  3. Çulha, A. A. (2012). Türkiye'de Vergi Gelirlerinin İktisadi Döngülere Duyarlılığı. Ekonomi Notları. 2012-34. TCMB.
  4. Dreher, Axel (2006): Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a New Index of Globalization, Applied Economics 38, 10, 1091-1110.
  5. Dreher, Axel, Noel Gaston and Pim Martens (2008), Measuring Globalisation – Gauging its Consequences (New York: Springer).
  6. Globalization.kof.ethz.ch. (2017).KOF Index of Globalization. [online] Available at: http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch/query/ [Accessed at:30 Jan. 2017].
  7. Haufler, A., Klemm, A., & Schjelderup, G. (2008). Redistributive Taxation, Multinational Enterprises and Economic Integration. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(1), 249–255.
  8. Krogstrup, S. (2004). Are Corporate Tax Burdens Racing to the Bottom in the European Union? EPRU Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/82018 [Accessed at: 26/11/2016].
  9. McDaniel, C. (2007). Average Tax Rates on Consumption, Investment, Labor and Capital in the OECD 1950-2003. Manuscript, Arizona State University, 1960–2004.
  10. Mendoza, E. G., Razin, A, &Tesar, L.L. (1994). Effective Tax Rates in Macroeconomics Cross-Country Estimates of Tax Rates on Factor Incomes and Consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 297-323.
  11. Neumann, R., Holman, J., & Alm, J. (2009). Globalization and Tax Policy. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 20(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2009.02.001 [Accessed at 26/11/2016].
  12. OECD detailed tax statistics, Data extracted on 30 May 2016 from OECD.Stat.
  13. OECD, Revenue Statistics 2015 / Statistiques des recettes publiques 2015 - © OCDE 2015.
  14. Sharma, P., & Singh, J. (2015). Determinants of Tax-Revenue in India: A Principal Component Analysis Approach. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 10(1), 18–29.
  15. Unlukaplan, I., & Arisoy, I. (2010). Turkiye Ekonomisi için Efektif Vergi Oranlarının Hesaplanması. Discussion Paper, Turkish Economic Association. Retrieved from http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/81679 [Accessed at 26/11/2016].
  16. Üngör, M. (2014). Average Effective Tax Rates on Consumption for Turkey: New Data and a Comparative Analysis. CBT Research Notes in Economics. 2014-02. TCMB.
  17. Zimmermannova, J., Skalickova, J., Siroky, J. (2016), What Can Tax Revenues Tell us about the Economic Activity of Regions? Economics and Sociology, Vol. 9, No 1, 114-128.