SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of the Musculuskeletal Systems and Kinesiophobia of the Individuals with Temporomandibular Disorders

HALİME ARIKAN
Meral SERTEL
Burcu BAŞ
Pages
132–138
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On this basis, it is need for further study with high level of evidence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the temporomandibular joint mobility, cervical mobility, head position, and kinesiophobia in individuals who were seperated into different groups according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, and were diagnosed with only one.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Individuals with temporomandibular disorders were divided into 3 groups according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On this basis, it is need for further study with high level of evidence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the temporomandibular joint mobility, cervical mobility, head position, and kinesiophobia in individuals who were seperated into different groups according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, and were diagnosed with only one. Methods: Individuals with temporomandibular disorders were divided into 3 groups according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. After obtaining sociodemographic information of individuals, cervical mobility and head position with a goniometer, temporomandibular joint mobility with a ruler, and kinesiophobia with a Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia were assessed. Results: In the statistical analysis among the groups; values for the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia of individuals in group 3 were higher than the others with temporomandibular disorders (p=0.002); while head position, temporomandibular joint mobility and cervical mobility values did not differ (p>0.05). Conclusion: It is considered that craniocervical symptoms can different in subgroups of temporomandibular disorders at the beginning. However, these symptoms were same in all groups, except kinesiophobia. On this basis, it is need for further study with high level of evidence.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIKAN, H., SERTEL, M., BAŞ, B. (2019). Evaluation of the Musculuskeletal Systems and Kinesiophobia of the Individuals with Temporomandibular Disorders. Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 132–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/125638

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. McCarty WL Jr, Darnell MW. Rehabilitation of the temporomandibular joint through the application of motion. Cranio 1993
  2. 298–307. 2. El-Hamalawy FA. Forward Head Correction Exercises For Management Of Myogenic Tempromandibular Joint Dysfunction. Journal of American Science 2011
  3. 71–7. 3. Iunes DH, Carvalho LCF, Oliveira AS, Bevilaqua-Grossi D. Craniocervical posture analysis in patients with temporomandibular disorder. Rev Bras Fisioter 2009
  4. 89–95. 4. Kitsoulis P, Marini A, Iliou K, Galani V, Zimpis A, Kanavaros P, et al. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders related to the degree of mouth opening and hearing loss. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2011
  5. Gil-Martínez A, Grande-Alonso M, López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, López-López A, Fernández-Carnero J, et al. Chronic Temporomandibular Disorders: disability, pain intensity and fear of movement. J Headache Pain. 2016
  6. Heuts PH, Vlaeyen JW, Roelofs J, de Bie RA, Aretz K, van Weel C, et al. Pain-related fear and daily functioning in patients with osteoarthritis. Pain 2004
  7. 228–35. 7. Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F, de Boer W, van der Zaag J, Naeije M. Prevalence of cervical spinal pain in craniomandibular pain patients. Eur J Oral Sci 2001
  8. 76–80. 8. Matheus RA, Ramos-Perez FM, Menezes AV, Ambrosano GM, Haiter-Neto F, Bóscolo FN, et al. The relationship between temporomandibular dysfunction and head and cervical posture. J Appl Oral Sci 2009
  9. 204–8. 9. Bonjardim LR, Gavião MBD, Pereira LJ, Castelo PM. Mandibular movements in children with and without signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. J Appl Oral Sci 2004
  10. 39–44. 10. Look JO, Schiffman EL, Truelove EL, Ahmad M. Reliability and validity of Axis I of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) with proposed revisions. J Oral Rehabil 2010
  11. 744–59. 11. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011
  12. 453–62. 12. Hase M. Adhesions in the temporomandibular joint: formation and significance. Aust Dent J 2002
  13. 163–9. 13. Ohrbach R, Burgess J. Temporomandibular disorders and craniofacial pain. CONNS CURRENT THERAPY 1999:997-1003. 14. Schmitter M, Kress B, Leckel M, Henschel V, Ohlmann B, Rammelsberg P. Validity of temporomandibular disorder examination procedures for assessment of