SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2017 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 39

Summary Ethical Issues in Neuroimaging Studies

Nörogörüntüleme Çalışmalarında Etı̇k Meseleler

ÖZLEM ERTAN KAYA
Pages
39–50
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, ethical training is considered to be very important

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Neuroimaging provides an opportunity to view the structural and functional level of the working brain in detailed manner (Fins, 2008).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Advances in neuroscience and neuroimaging technology led to new ethical, legal and social issues (Lombera, Fine, Grunau ve Illes, 2010; Shrivastava ve Behari, 2014; Tovino, 2005).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, ethical training is considered to be very important
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Neuroimaging provides an opportunity to view the structural and functional level of the working brain in detailed manner (Fins, 2008). In that sense, neuroimaging is worthwhile for clinicians and psychologists who investigate the association between brain and behaviour information. Advances in neuroscience and neuroimaging technology led to new ethical, legal and social issues (Lombera, Fine, Grunau ve Illes, 2010; Shrivastava ve Behari, 2014; Tovino, 2005). In the study, these issues are discussed on the basis of competence, informed consent, incidental findings, confidentiality, beneficence, and do no harm, and other issues. In addition, relationship between neuroimaging and law is discussed. Hence, more research attention should be directed at ethical issues in the neuroimaging studies, especially those with patient groups. Furthermore, ethical training is considered to be very important

Özet

Nörogörüntüleme, çalışan beynin yapısal ve işlevsel düzeyine ayrıntılı olarak bakmamıza olanak tanır (Fins, 2008). Bu bağlamda nörogörüntüleme; klinisyenler ve beyin - davranış ilişkisini açıklamaya çalışan psikologlar için değerli olabilir (Kulynych, 2002). Nörobilim ve nörogörüntüleme teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler; yeni etik, yasal ve sosyal meseleler doğurmuştur (Lombera, Fine, Grunau ve Illes, 2010; Shrivastava ve Behari, 2014; Tovino, 2005). Bu çalışmada, nörogörüntüleme çalışmaları ile ortaya çıkan ya da önem kazanan etik meselelere değinilmiştir. Bunlar; yeterlilik, aydınlatılmış onam, tesadüfi bulgular, gizlilik, yararlılık ve zarar vermeme ve diğer etik meselelerdir. Ayrıca, nörogörüntüleme ve hukuk ilişkisine de değinilmiştir. Nörogörüntüleme çalışmalarında etik sorunların önemli doğurgularının olabileceği, özellikle hasta gruplarıyla yapılan çalışmalarda kişilerin hassasiyetlerinin göz önünde bulundurulması gerektiği ve etik eğitiminin önemli olduğu düşünülmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, Ö. E. (2017). Summary Ethical Issues in Neuroimaging Studies. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 39, 39–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/125421

References (9)

  1. Aggarwal, N. K. ve Ford, E. (2013). The neuroethics and neurolaw of brain injury. Behavioral Sciences ve the Law, 31(6), 789–802. doi:10.1002/bsl.2086
  2. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060 Anderson, J. A., Eijkholt, M. ve Illes, J. (2013). Neuroethical issues in clinical neuroscience research. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 118, 335–43.
  3. Appelbaum, P. S. (2009). Through a glass darkly: functional neuroimaging evidence enters the courtroom. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.), 60(1), 21–23.
  4. Beatty, J. S., Williams, H. T., Aldridge, B. A., Hughes, M. P., Vasudeva, V. S., Gucwa, A. L., … McLoughlin, J. M. (2009). Incidental PET/CT findings in the cancer patient: How should they be managed? Surgery, 146(2), 274–281. doi:10.1016/j. surg.2009.04.024 Berlin, L. (2014).
  5. Neuroimaging, Expert Witnesses, and Ethics: Convergence and Conflict in the Courtroom. AJOB Neuroscience, 5(January 2015), 3–8.
  6. Binder, L. M. ve Thompson, L. L. (1995). The ethics code and neuropsychological assessment practices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10(1), 27–46.
  7. Brakewood, B. ve Poldrack, R. A. (2013). The ethics of secondary data analysis: Considering the application of Belmont principles to the sharing of neuroimaging data. NeuroImage, 82, 671–676. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.040 Brown, M. ve Knight, H. M. (2010). Attitudes towards participating in fMRI studies amongst participants in a birth cohort study. CLS Cohort Studies: Working Paper, 8, 1–13.
  8. Calhoun, V. D., Maciejewski, P. K., Pearlson, G. D. ve Keihl, K. A. (2008). Temporal lobe and “default” hemodynamic brain modes discriminate between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Human Brain Mapping, 29(11), 1265–1275. doi:10.1002/ hbm.20463.Temporal Carey, B. (2012). Study of Judges Finds Evidence From Brain Scans Led to Lighter Sentences. 13 Mayıs 2016 tarihinde http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/17/science/brain-evidence-sways-sentencing-in-study-of-judges.html adresinden alınmıştır. Chen, W. (2007). Clinical applications of PET in brain tumors. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 48(9), 1468– 81. doi:10.2967/jnumed.106.037689 Department of Health and Human Services. (2002). Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information; Final Rule. Federal Register, 67(157), 1–93.
  9. Du, W., Calhoun, V. D., Li, H., Ma, S., Eichele, T., Kiehl, K. A., … Adali, T. (2012). High Classification Accuracy for Schizophrenia with Rest a