SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 14

ART IN PUBLIC WORKS AND KITSCH OBJECTS FROM AN AESTHETIC POINT OF VIEW

Mustafa Cevat ATALAY
Pages
111–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Faculty Of Fine Arts, Design And Architecture Abstract: The main purpose of this article is to aesthetically evaluate the overall status of works of art and kitsch objects in public areas in terms of existing problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Faculty Of Fine Arts, Design And Architecture Abstract: The main purpose of this article is to aesthetically evaluate the overall status of works of art and kitsch objects in public areas in terms of existing problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When the aesthetic works are applied in public areas and the kitsch objects will be separated from each other, environmental aesthetic will have done an important duty on making the human to possess aesthetic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ideally, if environmental aestheticists are able to distinguish between public art works and subjects, field experts contribute actively and the users of public domain join the democratic process of choosing, public art works are determined and appiled.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Faculty Of Fine Arts, Design And Architecture Abstract: The main purpose of this article is to aesthetically evaluate the overall status of works of art and kitsch objects in public areas in terms of existing problems. The importance of a work of art in the formation of a culture of high aesthetic value can be seen. People who understand the difference between kitsch and aesthetic and use it in their lives can contribute the aesthetic and culture of the society and divide works which are consistent or not. The importance of public art on human life is known. When the aesthetic works are applied in public areas and the kitsch objects will be separated from each other, environmental aesthetic will have done an important duty on making the human to possess aesthetic. We can see works of plastic arts in many different channels in Turkey. The works applied or exhibited in public can be examples. These works of art - objects are applied by being selected in a competition, by a special board or by the public rating and so on. The works of art as applied to public area are naturally under many preference judgment and some of these assessments can be very negative and positive. Sometimes, applied works of art can be evaluated as kitsch objects. The objects that were evaluated as kitsch have sometimes been taken as a result of the strictures and sometimes they can’t have been taken out by some excuses as the strictures are objective. An aesthetic environment and the possibility of ideal existence of human can be achieved with the aesthetic of public art works and making people aesthetic at first. Ideally, if environmental aestheticists are able to distinguish between public art works and subjects, field experts contribute actively and the users of public domain join the democratic process of choosing, public art works are determined and appiled.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATALAY, M. C. (2014). ART IN PUBLIC WORKS AND KITSCH OBJECTS FROM AN AESTHETIC POINT OF VIEW. IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 14, 111–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/125380

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. AKSOY, A., ERTÜRK, E., (2008).
  2. Kamusal Alan ve Güncel Sanat, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları:
  3. İstanbul İLKYAZ, A., (2004).
  4. Popüler Kültür, Kitsch (kiç). ve Sanat Eğitimine Etkileri. 2. Sanat Eğitimi Sempozyumu. Gündüz Eğitim ve Yayın: Ankara TURANÎ, A., (2009). Çağdaş Sanat Felsefesi, 2.basım. Remzi kitabevi, İstanbul ATALAY, M. C., (2013 ). Yüksek Öğrenim Gören Öğrencilerin Estetik Tercihleri, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara HUME, D., (1997). İnsan doğası üzerine bir inceleme, idea yayınevi, İstanbul SOLHELJ, D., (2010).
  5. Kıtsch Üzerine, Mitos-boyut yayınları: İstanbul BAKÇAY, E., (2007). İstanbul’da 1960 sonrası gerçekleştirilen uygulamalar özelinde plastik sanatların kent mekânıyla ilişkisi, İstanbul güzel sanatlar enstitüsü, yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi BEKSAÇ, E., AKKAYA, T., (1990) Kaynak ve Kökleriyle Avrupa Resim Sanatı, Gelişim Ve Değişim Süreci İçinde Başlangıcından Rönesans Sonuna, Arkeoloji ve Sanat yayınları: İstanbul KURT, E.K., (2007). Kamusal Alanda Sanat Ve Kentsel Mekâna Etkileri, İstanbul’da Heykel Uygulamaları İrdelemesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü: İstanbul SELVİ, E., (2008). Kitsch olgusunun lise öğrencilerinin estetik algı ve beğenilerine etkileri.(yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gazi üniversitesi eğitim bilimleri enstitüsü uygulamalı sanatlar eğitimi anabilim dalı mesleki eğitimi bilim dalı: Ankara DEMİR, F.G.İ., (2009).
  6. Kiç ve Plastik Sanatlar, Ütopya Yayınevi:
  7. Ankara KAHRAMAN, H.B., ( 2002). Sanatsal Gerçeklikler Olgular ve Öteleri, Everest yayınları: İstanbul J. ERZEN (2006).
  8. Çevre Estetiği, ODTU Basımevi: Ankara STUBBEN, J., (2013). Practıcal And Aesthetıc Prıncıples For The Layıng Out Of Cıtıes; www.library.cornell.edu/ Erişim: 3.9.2013
  9. LUKACS, G., (1988). Estetik III, cev. A. Cemal, Payel Yayınevi:
  10. İstanbul ÖZBEK, M., (2004).
  11. Kamusal Alan, Hil Yayın: İstanbul ATALAY, M.C., (2012 ). Kamusal Alan Heykellerindeki Estetiğin, Beğeni Tutumlarının Ölçülmesi, Language And Communication: Research Trends And Challenges. Üniversty: İzmir ERGÜVEN, M., (1992). Yoruma doğru. Yapı Kredi Yayınları:
  12. İstanbul KUNDERA, M., (2012). Varolmanın dayanılmaz hafifliği, 39. Basım İletişim yayınevi: İstanbul BÜRGER, P., (2012).
  13. Avangard Kuramı, İleti- şim yayınları: İstanbul BODEİ, R., (2008).
  14. Güzelin Biçimleri, Dost Kitabevi:
  15. Ankara ŞAŞMAZER, Y., (2006).
  16. Figüratif Heykelde Gerçekçilik, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Mimar Sinan Ünive